[LU-4514] lfsck on 2.x only file system updates igif file count Created: 20/Jan/14 Updated: 07/Jun/16 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Trivial |
| Reporter: | Rajeshwaran Ganesan | Assignee: | Lai Siyao |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 12351 |
| Description |
|
KIT has a question about lfsck and igif files. We ran into
Basically we are unsure about where the updates and igif files are coming from since this filesystem has always been 2.x, and we were under the impression that igif files were only on 1.8->2.x filesystems. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 20/Jan/14 ] |
|
Lai Could you please advise on this one? thanks Peter |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 22/Jan/14 ] |
|
I think there are a few internal Lustre files that get IGIF FIDs assigned when LFSCK is run. Not totally sure which ones those are for sure, but since LFSCK was only added in 2.4.0, and some of the internal files were added/changed in older releases they may not have had LMA xattrs (which hold the FID). In summary, I don't think there is a problem, but hopefully Fan Yong can confirm. |
| Comment by Kit Westneat (Inactive) [ 22/Jan/14 ] |
|
Yeah, everything seems to be running fine. I thought it could just be Lustre internal files (I saw |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 23/Jan/14 ] |
|
Right Andreas, for old Lustre-2.x, there were some local objects without FID-in-LMA. From the LFSCK/OI_scrub view, if we do not know their local names/FIDs, they will be in-distinguishable from IGIF objects, so OI_scrub will assign IGIF mode FIDs to them. It is harmless. As for the count, we can list the local files under "/" via debugfs. I suspect there are some log files. |