[LU-4566] Downgrade lustre version from lustre 1.8.9 to 1.8.7 Created: 30/Jan/14 Updated: 27/Feb/14 Resolved: 27/Feb/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Supporto Lustre Jnet2000 (Inactive) | Assignee: | Cliff White (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Not a Bug | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
redhat 5.7 lustre-1.8.9-2.6.18_348.3.1.el5_lustre.g0667314_g7880158 |
||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 12461 |
| Description |
|
For testing purpose, we want to downgrade our lustre environment to version 1.8.7 starting from 1.8.9. Is this operation supported and without risks? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 30/Jan/14 ] |
|
Could you please clarify - was this cluster initially installed as 1.8.7-wc1 then upgraded to 1.8.9-wc1, or was it a fresh install of 1.8.9-wc1? |
| Comment by Supporto Lustre Jnet2000 (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/14 ] |
|
Hi, the cluster is initially 1.8.7-wc1 and the upgraded to 1.8.9 regards |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 04/Feb/14 ] |
|
This should work ok in theory but we only explicitly tested upgrading/downgrading from/to 1.8.8-wc1 during 1.8.9-wc1 release testing. We would certainly help you with any problems that you ran into during such a downgrade. Having said that, why would you want to do such a downgrade? Have you run into issues on 1.8.9-wc1? |
| Comment by Supporto Lustre Jnet2000 (Inactive) [ 05/Feb/14 ] |
|
Hi, regards |
| Comment by Cliff White (Inactive) [ 05/Feb/14 ] |
|
There should be no issues during a downgrade, as you are moving only two minor releases. There are no changes to the Lustre configuration, only versions of the RPMs change. For downgrade, you would simply re-install the previous set of RPMS. Also, there are no issues in this case with a mixed environment, so you can do a rolling upgrade or a rolling downgrade. The cluster and clients should work just fine with any mix of 1.8.7-wc1 and 1.8.9-wc1. |
| Comment by Gabriele Paciucci (Inactive) [ 27/Feb/14 ] |
|
I have talked with the customer, please mark this issue as resolved. Thanks |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 27/Feb/14 ] |
|
ok - thanks Gabriele! |