[LU-4724] Test failure on test suite sanity-hsm, subtest test_71

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.5.1, Lustre 2.12.3
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.5.1
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Blocker
• Reporter: Maloo
• Assignee: Michael MacDonald (Inactive)
• Resolution: Fixed
• Labels: HSM
• Severity: 3

Description

This issue was created by maloo for John Hammond <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e688c5ae-a550-11e3-9e53-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_71 failed with the following error:

Copytool sent malformed event: {"event_time": "2014-03-06 03:11:53 -0800", "event_type": "LOGGED_MESSAGE", "level": "INFO", "message": "lhsmtool_posix[8611]: waiting for message from kernel"

Unknown macro: {"event_time"}

Info required for matching: sanity-hsm 71

Comments

[John Hammond]

Writing to the event FIFO uses fprintf() with an unbuffered stream and there is no synchronization around calls to llapi_hsm_write_json_event() that I can see. So since the CT is multithreaded expect more such malformed events.

[Michael MacDonald (Inactive)]

Looking into this.

[Michael MacDonald (Inactive)]

I've been able to reproduce this locally by running test_71 in a loop. Will implement a fix and soak it for a while this morning before pushing for review.

[Michael MacDonald (Inactive)]

Pushed http://review.whamcloud.com/9553 for review. Soaked this locally for 64 runs, zero failures. Without it, was getting failures about 33% of the time. Lesson learned.

[Michael MacDonald (Inactive)]

jhammond: I've added you as a reviewer. Please take a look when you have a chance.

[Jian Yu]

Lustre Build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/40/ (2.5.1 RC2)
Distro/Arch: RHEL6.5/x86_64

sanity-hsm test 71 hit the same failure:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f3e026c4-a687-11e3-9d0d-52540035b04c

This is a regression failure on Lustre 2.5.1 RC2 introduced by the patch of http://review.whamcloud.com/9512 for LU-4020.

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

backport to b2_5:
http://review.whamcloud.com/9579

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

I see that Michael already did a back port. Will abandon mine. Sorry for the confusion.

[Peter Jones]

Landed for 2.5.1 and 2.6