[LU-4980] Interop 2.5.1<->2.6 failure on test suite sanity-scrub test_11: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 2

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.5.1
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.5.2
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Minor
• Reporter: Maloo
• Assignee: nasf (Inactive)
• Resolution: Fixed
• Severity: 3

Description

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/59f8d19a-cd25-11e3-9ff6-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_11 failed with the following error:

(8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 2

CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 3 -r
Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-MDT0000 -r
Started LFSCK on the device lustre-MDT0000.
CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
CMD: client-12vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub
 sanity-scrub test_11: @@@@@@ FAIL: (8) Expect 0 objects skipped on mds1, but got 2 

Comments

[Jodi Levi (Inactive)]

Fan Yong,
Could you please comment on this one and what you think the priority is for 2.6?
Thank you!

[nasf (Inactive)]

I do not think think it is interoperability issue. I have made a patch to make the test on Lustre-2.5 to be more robust. We already have related handling on Lustre-2.6.

http://review.whamcloud.com/10214

[nasf (Inactive)]

The patch has been landed to Lustre-2.5.1