[LU-5121] replay-ost-single test_0b: OOM on the OST Created: 30/May/14 Updated: 28/Oct/14 Resolved: 11/Jul/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 14130 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for wangdi <di.wang@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/90389636-e54f-11e3-bb3a-52540035b04c. The sub-test test_0b failed with the following error:
Info required for matching: replay-ost-single 0b |
| Comments |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 08/Oct/14 ] |
|
Another failure instance: |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 08/Oct/14 ] |
|
Another failure instance: |
| Comment by Johann Lombardi (Inactive) [ 20/Oct/14 ] |
|
Another instance: From the crash dump: <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Out of memory: system-wide panic_on_oom is enabled <0> <4>Pid: 26633, comm: ll_ost00_010 Not tainted 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6_lustre.g01c1143.x86_64 #1 <4>Call Trace: <4> [<ffffffff81528ffc>] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f <4> [<ffffffff81122bf1>] ? dump_header+0x101/0x1b0 <4> [<ffffffff81122d1c>] ? check_panic_on_oom+0x7c/0x80 <4> [<ffffffff811233db>] ? out_of_memory+0x1bb/0x3c0 <4> [<ffffffff8112fd5f>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x89f/0x8d0 <4> [<ffffffff8116e6d2>] ? kmem_getpages+0x62/0x170 <4> [<ffffffff8116f2ea>] ? fallback_alloc+0x1ba/0x270 <4> [<ffffffff8116ed3f>] ? cache_grow+0x2cf/0x320 <4> [<ffffffff8116f069>] ? ____cache_alloc_node+0x99/0x160 <4> [<ffffffff8124cd7c>] ? crypto_create_tfm+0x3c/0xe0 <4> [<ffffffff8116fe39>] ? __kmalloc+0x189/0x220 <4> [<ffffffff8124cd7c>] ? crypto_create_tfm+0x3c/0xe0 <4> [<ffffffff81253718>] ? crypto_init_shash_ops+0x68/0x100 <4> [<ffffffff8124ce8a>] ? __crypto_alloc_tfm+0x6a/0x130 <4> [<ffffffff8124d6fa>] ? crypto_alloc_base+0x5a/0xb0 <4> [<ffffffffa048d107>] ? cfs_crypto_hash_alloc+0x77/0x290 [libcfs] <4> [<ffffffffa048d7e6>] ? cfs_crypto_hash_digest+0x66/0xf0 [libcfs] <4> [<ffffffff8116febc>] ? __kmalloc+0x20c/0x220 <4> [<ffffffffa081f3e3>] ? lustre_msg_calc_cksum+0xd3/0x140 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa0858e01>] ? null_authorize+0xa1/0x100 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa0847e96>] ? sptlrpc_svc_wrap_reply+0x56/0x1c0 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa081780c>] ? ptlrpc_send_reply+0x1fc/0x7f0 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa082ee85>] ? ptlrpc_at_check_timed+0xcd5/0x1370 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa08262f9>] ? ptlrpc_wait_event+0xa9/0x2d0 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa0830808>] ? ptlrpc_main+0x12e8/0x1990 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffffa082f520>] ? ptlrpc_main+0x0/0x1990 [ptlrpc] <4> [<ffffffff8109abf6>] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0 <4> [<ffffffff811bffc0>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x50 <4> [<ffffffff8100c20a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20 <4> [<ffffffff8109ab60>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 <4> [<ffffffff8100c200>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 |
| Comment by Bruno Faccini (Inactive) [ 28/Oct/14 ] |
|
One more at https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/3840229a-5e22-11e4-b92b-5254006e85c2. |