[LU-5224] Lustre client build failed with Mellanox OFED Created: 18/Jun/14 Updated: 14/Aug/14 Resolved: 12/Aug/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.4.1, Lustre 2.5.0, Lustre 2.5.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.5.3 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | wu libin (Inactive) | Assignee: | Minh Diep |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | patch | ||
| Environment: |
SLES11 SP3 X86_64, with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-2.2-1.0.1 |
||
| Epic/Theme: | lnet |
| Severity: | 3 |
| Epic: | client, lnet |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 14558 |
| Description |
|
I am try to compile lustre client rpms on SLES11 SP3 with the MLNX_OFED-2.2: |
| Comments |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 19/Jun/14 ] |
|
I see a proposed solution at http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10749. our regular autotest doesn't build with MLNX ofed stack so only shows the change doesn't break regular builds. Can anybody confirm the fix does fix the build with MLNX on more than one distro? I'm concerned to know that a fix tried on sles11sp3 doesn't break anything on el6, for example. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 07/Jul/14 ] |
|
Patch for master has landed. Back ported patch for b2_5 is at http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10819 |
| Comment by Jay Lan (Inactive) [ 06/Aug/14 ] |
|
The #10819 patch did not help us. We hit the same problem in building 2.4.3 against MLNX 2.2. Kernel is sles11sp3 3.0.101-0.31.1. ... |
| Comment by Jay Lan (Inactive) [ 06/Aug/14 ] |
|
There are more than one ways to end up with /usr/src/ofa_kernel/nasa/include/linux/pm_qos_params.h. Why don't we just add in config/lustre-build-linux.m4? Worked for me, and #10819 is not needed any more. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 06/Aug/14 ] |
|
Does this only happen for the 2.4 code base? Do we need this fix for 2.5 as well. |
| Comment by Jay Lan (Inactive) [ 07/Aug/14 ] |
|
I believe so. Fixing at o2iblnd.h (as in #10819) is not a correct fix. The build of my 2.5.1 client failed on lustre/lmv/lproc_lmv.c. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 12/Aug/14 ] |
|
This looks like it was landed for 2.6 |