[LU-5338] sanity-lfsck test_11b: (9) expect lastid1 0x100000000:569 Created: 14/Jul/14 Updated: 20/Dec/23 Resolved: 11/Jul/20 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.10.5, Lustre 2.10.7, Lustre 2.10.8 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.14.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Andreas Dilger |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | lfsck | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 14894 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1d50d682-0990-11e4-a958-5254006e85c2. This may be a dup of The sub-test test_11b failed with the following error:
Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 11b |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 14/Jul/14 ] |
|
The test log shows: Update not seen after 60s: wanted '569' got '577' It looks like the test could be improved a bit: echo "the on-disk LAST_ID should have been rebuilt" wait_update_facet ost1 "$LCTL get_param -n \ obdfilter.${ost1_svc}.last_id | grep 0x100000000 | awk -F: '{ print \\\$2 }'" "$lastid1" 60 || { $LCTL get_param -n obdfilter.${ost1_svc}.last_id error "(9) expect lastid1 0x100000000:$lastid1" } The actual value should be printed in the error message, and it isn't clear that having a higher LAST_ID value is a failure? |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 30/Nov/18 ] |
|
The failure occurred again on Lustre b2_10 branch: |
| Comment by Minh Diep [ 08/Jan/19 ] |
|
+1 on b2_10: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/7fd76655-6a66-4fe8-bd8e-d538bf73351d |
| Comment by Alex Zhuravlev [ 26/Feb/19 ] |
|
https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/aaebc59a-39b2-11e9-913f-52540065bddc |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/Mar/19 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (adilger@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34349 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 10/Jul/20 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34349/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 11/Jul/20 ] |
|
Landed for 2.14 |