[LU-5761] replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked Created: 17/Oct/14 Updated: 27/Aug/19 Resolved: 17/Mar/18 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.7.0, Lustre 2.11.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.11.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | Andreas Dilger | Assignee: | Andreas Dilger |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | zfs | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 16168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Hit this problem on Maloo test on latest master branch: It is similiar with ORI-412 reported on Orion. Test logs of test_89 attached. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 17/Oct/14 ] |
|
Open this as a separate version of |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 08/May/15 ] |
|
I've run this test a few times recently and it has passed. Is this still an issue? The following are results for replay-single, with ZFS, where test 89 pass. I'm wondering if we should re-enable this test to get more test results and see if this test still fails. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 19/May/15 ] |
|
James, could you please submit a patch to re-enable this test, and have it run the test a bunch of times to see if it is passing? I suspect that this is only an intermittent failure, so we don't want to enable it with only a single passing test run. See |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 28/May/15 ] |
|
I've run this test several times and it still fails occasionally. Here's one failure: |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Nov/17 ] |
|
More failure instances on master branch: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/24875632-ce5a-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/95511308-cbfd-11e7-8027-52540065bddc |
| Comment by Jinshan Xiong (Inactive) [ 25/Nov/17 ] |
|
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a6ab66ac-d1ad-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 26/Nov/17 ] |
|
This test was just removed from ALWAYS_EXCEPT via patch https://review.whamcloud.com/27404 " |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 27/Nov/17 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30252 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 28/Nov/17 ] |
|
It may well be that this test cannot pass as-is with ZFS, since the COW nature of ZFS means that there may be blocks that are not released for some time. Either we need to bump up the limit for ZFS (which makes the test much less useful), or wait longer for old TXGs to be released and free up the space. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/Dec/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/30252/ |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/Feb/18 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31120 |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 13/Mar/18 ] |
|
another on master: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c722f698-265d-11e8-9e0e-52540065bddc
|
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 17/Mar/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31120/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 17/Mar/18 ] |
|
Landed for 2.11 |