[LU-5763] Interop 2.6.0<->2.7 sanity-lfsck test_10: (16) unexpected status Created: 17/Oct/14  Updated: 20/Feb/15  Resolved: 21/Oct/14

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.7.0
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: nasf (Inactive)
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

server: lustre-master build # 2691
client: 2.6.0


Issue Links:
Duplicate
duplicates LU-5301 Test failure sanity-lfsck test_17: (3... Closed
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 16171

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/4dc94aa6-5553-11e4-a570-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_10 failed with the following error:

(16) unexpected status

test log

CMD: shadow-6vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdd.lustre-MDT0000.lfsck_namespace
name: lfsck_namespace
magic: 0xa0629d03
version: 2
status: scanning-phase2
flags: scanned-once,inconsistent
param:
time_since_last_completed: 149 seconds
time_since_latest_start: 35 seconds
time_since_last_checkpoint: 4 seconds
latest_start_position: 12, N/A, N/A
last_checkpoint_position: 26129, [0x200000bd1:0x2:0x0], 0x471591dd68dc7bba
first_failure_position: N/A, N/A, N/A
checked_phase1: 15150
checked_phase2: 6572
updated_phase1: 3993
updated_phase2: 5633
failed_phase1: 0
failed_phase2: 0
directories: 1003
dirent_repaired: 0
linkea_repaired: 3993
nlinks_repaired: 0
lost_found: 0
multiple_linked_checked: 5992
multiple_linked_repaired: 1
unknown_inconsistency: 0
unmatched_pairs_repaired: 0
dangling_repaired: 0
success_count: 3
run_time_phase1: 31 seconds
run_time_phase2: 4 seconds
average_speed_phase1: 488 items/sec
average_speed_phase2: 1643 objs/sec
real_time_speed_phase1: N/A
real_time_speed_phase2: 1521 objs/sec
current_position: [0x200000bd0:0x38ba:0x0]
 sanity-lfsck test_10: @@@@@@ FAIL: (16) unexpected status 

Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 10



 Comments   
Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 17/Oct/14 ]

Fan Yong,
Can you comment if this is just a test interop issue? We aren't landing patches on b2_6, so we may just ignore this interop test failure.

Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 21/Oct/14 ]

There are too much objects left from former other sanity-xxx tests, as to the LFSCK could NOT finish the scanning in the given time. So it is not an interoperability issue, but related with the test environment and test scripts. We have another ticket to adjust the sanity-lfsck test timeout in LU-5301. If we do not want to land patches to b2_6, then we can mark this one as the duplication of LU-5301.

Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 21/Oct/14 ]

It is another instance of LU-5301.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 01:54:18 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.