[LU-5763] Interop 2.6.0<->2.7 sanity-lfsck test_10: (16) unexpected status Created: 17/Oct/14 Updated: 20/Feb/15 Resolved: 21/Oct/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.6.0, Lustre 2.7.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | nasf (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
server: lustre-master build # 2691 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 16171 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for sarah <sarah@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/4dc94aa6-5553-11e4-a570-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_10 failed with the following error: (16) unexpected status test log CMD: shadow-6vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdd.lustre-MDT0000.lfsck_namespace name: lfsck_namespace magic: 0xa0629d03 version: 2 status: scanning-phase2 flags: scanned-once,inconsistent param: time_since_last_completed: 149 seconds time_since_latest_start: 35 seconds time_since_last_checkpoint: 4 seconds latest_start_position: 12, N/A, N/A last_checkpoint_position: 26129, [0x200000bd1:0x2:0x0], 0x471591dd68dc7bba first_failure_position: N/A, N/A, N/A checked_phase1: 15150 checked_phase2: 6572 updated_phase1: 3993 updated_phase2: 5633 failed_phase1: 0 failed_phase2: 0 directories: 1003 dirent_repaired: 0 linkea_repaired: 3993 nlinks_repaired: 0 lost_found: 0 multiple_linked_checked: 5992 multiple_linked_repaired: 1 unknown_inconsistency: 0 unmatched_pairs_repaired: 0 dangling_repaired: 0 success_count: 3 run_time_phase1: 31 seconds run_time_phase2: 4 seconds average_speed_phase1: 488 items/sec average_speed_phase2: 1643 objs/sec real_time_speed_phase1: N/A real_time_speed_phase2: 1521 objs/sec current_position: [0x200000bd0:0x38ba:0x0] sanity-lfsck test_10: @@@@@@ FAIL: (16) unexpected status Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 10 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 17/Oct/14 ] |
|
Fan Yong, |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 21/Oct/14 ] |
|
There are too much objects left from former other sanity-xxx tests, as to the LFSCK could NOT finish the scanning in the given time. So it is not an interoperability issue, but related with the test environment and test scripts. We have another ticket to adjust the sanity-lfsck test timeout in |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 21/Oct/14 ] |
|
It is another instance of |