[LU-6206] conf-sanity test_53a: Insane OST thread counts Created: 04/Feb/15 Updated: 03/Jun/16 Resolved: 03/Jun/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Andreas Dilger |
| Resolution: | Incomplete | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 17360 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/29448bbe-ac56-11e4-b832-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_53a failed with the following error: $'Assertion 27 failed: (($tmax2 < $tmin)) (expanded: ((4 < 3))) Insane OST thread counts' Suspect this may be due to the very recent landing of Info required for matching: conf-sanity 53a |
| Comments |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
more, all reported in the last day: |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Patch landed yesterday in |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
looking at the event history of Patch Set 17 in http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/2876 I see FAILs in conf-sanity. don't think it should have gotten +maloo. suspect some TEI fault there. shouldn't have landed. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Looking into why it fails now. |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
I suspect this line in conf-sanity.sh: lassert 27 "$msg" '(($tmax2 < $tmin))' || return $? It looks entirely logic reversed to me. think it should be: lassert 27 "$msg" '(($tmin < $tmax2))' || return $? Of course there could be additional flaws introduced by the bad commit covered up by always hitting this one first. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Yep, just confirmed it is the conf-sanity test changes that break things. Let see if your above change is all that is needed. BTW what is the string I should add to the patch to only run this test? |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
I think you are looking for something like: Test-Parameters: fortestonly testlist=conf-sanity,conf-sanity,conf-sanity envdefintions=ONLY=53a in the commit header. When ready to land probably need to edit the commit header & remove Test-parameters. |
| Comment by Jodi Levi (Inactive) [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
We have reverted http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/2876 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
We've reverted the original patch from master. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Patches that are currently based on a tree with that patch in it should rebase to after the reverted patch. We are also looking to disable these tests temporarily so that any patches that haven't hit this failure yet can pass. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Yes Bob it was that one line in the test script that was breaking everything. I will push a new version of |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
Thanks James. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Feb/15 ] |
|
PS: we are also investigating how/why Maloo marked this test failure with Verified +1 when it clearly failed the review-dne-part-1 test. We know that review-zfs is currently optional so the presence of a failure in that test wouldn't itself cause Maloo to mark the overall result -1, but the other failure should have. It should be noted that (excluding the hit from this issue) we have resolved a major blocker for ZFS testing ( |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 20/Feb/15 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/13823 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/May/15 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13823/ |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 05/May/15 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/14682 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 06/May/15 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/14682/ |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 03/Jun/16 ] |
|
This test is no longer failing. Will leave cleanups to some future date. |