625.diff
|
Related |
|||
| is related to | LU-8688 | All Lustre test suites should run/PAS... | Open |
[LU-625] sanityn test_32a test failure Created: 23/Aug/11 Updated: 10/Oct/16 Resolved: 03/Jan/12 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.1.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.2.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | James A Simmons | Assignee: | Lai Siyao |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
4 DDN 9900 OSS each with 7 OSTs. One MDS server with a seperate MDT and MGT. 43 clients mounting the file system. |
||
| Attachments: |
625.diff
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 4794 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanityn test 32a: lockless truncate =============================================================== 13:28:45 (1314120525) |
| Comments |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 23/Aug/11 ] |
|
Uploaded logs to your fpt server. The logs are in uploads/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 13/Dec/11 ] |
|
James Are you still seeing this issue with the latest code? Peter |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 13/Dec/11 ] |
|
Yes its still fails. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 13/Dec/11 ] |
|
Thanks James. Lai Could you please look into this one? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Lai Siyao [ 16/Dec/11 ] |
|
The log doesn't show anything abnormal. I made a debug patch for sanityn.sh test 32a, could you patch that and run the test again? |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 19/Dec/11 ] |
|
Here are the results from your debug patch checking cached lockless truncate |
| Comment by Lai Siyao [ 21/Dec/11 ] |
|
James, could you verify the fix here: http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1901 sanityn.sh test 32a test with a static file size 10M, but your system has 28 OSTs, thus a write to 10M won't take extent lock on all OSTs, and some of the later truncate (18 actually, 10 others get lock from cache) will go through lockless_truncate. |
| Comment by James A Simmons [ 28/Dec/11 ] |
|
The patch fixed the issue. Thank you. |
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
| Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 04/Jan/12 ] |
|
Integrated in Result = SUCCESS
|
