[LU-6567] sanity test_69: test failed to respond and timed out Created: 05/May/15  Updated: 26/May/15  Resolved: 26/May/15

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.8.0
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: WC Triage
Resolution: Not a Bug Votes: 0
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Blocker
is blocking LU-6260 more support for 3.16 linux kernel Resolved
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d0419a58-f2f4-11e4-9186-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_69 failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out

after none for years 4 instances of this in the last day. either a TEI problem or something bad recently in master.

more instances:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/59ebe636-f2f1-11e4-acf4-5254006e85c2
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/dd96b002-f318-11e4-a51d-5254006e85c2
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c057d9aa-f31b-11e4-9186-5254006e85c2

Info required for matching: sanity 69



 Comments   
Comment by John Hammond [ 05/May/15 ]

I think this is due to NFS issues on shadow.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 07/May/15 ]

All of these failures are on the patch series starting with http://review.whamcloud.com/14665 "LU-6260 llite: add support for direct IO api changes" so it appears this is a regression in that patch.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 07/May/15 ]

I see in these test failures in the client console logs:

09:24:13:LustreError: 28548:0:(rw26.c:260:ll_direct_rw_pages()) ASSERTION( !(file_offset & (page_size - 1)) ) failed: 
09:24:13:LustreError: 28548:0:(rw26.c:260:ll_direct_rw_pages()) LBUG
Comment by James A Simmons [ 07/May/15 ]

It is a real failure. I will start to look at it tomorrow to resolve the bug.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 26/May/15 ]

The latest version of this patch no longer fails this test. We can close this ticket.

Comment by Peter Jones [ 26/May/15 ]

ok thanks James

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:01:20 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.