[LU-6715] sanity-lfsck test_15c: Fail to repair unmatched pair Created: 12/Jun/15  Updated: 29/May/16  Resolved: 16/Jun/15

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: nasf (Inactive)
Resolution: Won't Fix Votes: 0
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Related
is related to LU-6475 race between open and migration Resolved
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark <nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e4bfb850-10d3-11e5-9bc9-5254006e85c2
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a1c845f4-c424-11e4-a0ef-5254006e85c2
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/18bd9ae2-cd85-11e4-8795-5254006e85c2

The sub-test test_15c failed with the following error:

(3) Fail to repair unmatched pair: 0

Please provide additional information about the failure here.

Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 15c



 Comments   
Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 16/Jun/15 ]

sanity-lfsck test_15c will be obsolete because of the patch:
http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/14497/

Comment by John Hammond [ 24/May/16 ]

Fan Yong, we are seeing this on b2_7_fe should the test be disabled there?

Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 24/May/16 ]

The patch 14497 resolve the issue that was tested by test_15c. It seems that such patch has NOT been ported to b2_7_fe yet. So test_15c should be still valid on b2_7_fe unless you are making some interoperability tests with master.

Comment by John Hammond [ 26/May/16 ]

15c is failing on b2_7_fe review testing. See https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/35235730-2199-11e6-9089-5254006e85c2. Is there a fix for this?

Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 29/May/16 ]

Because the patch 14497 made the test_15c obsolete, there was no special fix for that. So depends on whether we want to port 14497 patch to b2_7_fe, if no, then we need other solution for test_15c failure.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:02:37 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.