[LU-696] Test failure on test suite sanity, subtest test_101c Created: 21/Sep/11 Updated: 02/Mar/12 Resolved: 02/Mar/12 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.1.0, Lustre 1.8.7 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Yang Sheng |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
Lustre Clients: Lustre Servers: |
||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 6113 |
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Minh Diep <mdiep@whamcloud.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/9d355b6c-e43f-11e0-9909-52540025f9af. The sub-test test_101c failed with the following error:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Minh Diep [ 21/Sep/11 ] |
|
== sanity test 101c: check stripe_size aligned read-ahead =================== 01:12:22 (1316506342) 4.296548s, 152.532MB/s |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 23/Sep/11 ] |
|
Lustre Clients: Lustre Servers: sanity test 101c also failed in manual run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/1e2337f0-e5b5-11e0-9909-52540025f9af It passed while running on Lustre 1.8.6-wc1 clients with 2.1.0 RC1 servers: |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 10/Oct/11 ] |
|
Lustre Branch: b1_8 sanity test 101c also failed: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/3cbc97e6-f24a-11e0-908b-52540025f9af |
| Comment by Jian Yu [ 15/Feb/12 ] |
|
Lustre Clients: Lustre Servers: sanity test 101c also failed: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a23649e4-5791-11e1-99fa-5254004bbbd3 |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 29/Feb/12 ] |
|
YangSheng Could you please look into this one? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Yang Sheng [ 01/Mar/12 ] |
|
The commit f1a4b79e378407e4161c2a922478d625a38452b5 already remove the big rpc in 101c, So looks like this issue can be ignore? Maybe WangDi has some point for that. |
| Comment by Di Wang [ 01/Mar/12 ] |
|
Yes, that check is not correct. The patch for lu-983(http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1998) will remove that check. |
| Comment by Yang Sheng [ 02/Mar/12 ] |
|
AS WangDi's comment, close it. |