[LU-7126] parallel-scale-nfsv3 test_metabench: test failed to respond and timed out Created: 09/Sep/15  Updated: 17/Jul/17

Status: Open
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.8.0
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: WC Triage
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: zfs
Environment:

client and server: lustre-master build #3175 RHEL6.6 zfs


Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for sarah_lw <wei3.liu@intel.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/93c02354-54ee-11e5-9766-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_metabench failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out

Please provide additional information about the failure here.

Info required for matching: parallel-scale-nfsv3 metabench



 Comments   
Comment by Sarah Liu [ 02/Oct/15 ]

this may be a dup of LU-4950

https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b05cf9da-6158-11e5-b495-5254006e85c2
OST console

15:52:46:kjournald     D 0000000000000000     0   432      2 0x00000000
15:52:46: ffff8800376dfc50 0000000000000046 ffff8800ffffffff 00001c60f9a79057
15:52:46: 0000000000000001 ffff880076bb5830 0000000000239e32 ffffffffa9feaf4f
15:52:46: 000000000c85cf92 ffffffff81aa6700 ffff880037b05068 ffff8800376dffd8
15:52:46:Call Trace:
15:52:46: [<ffffffff811c9270>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
15:52:46: [<ffffffff815393d3>] io_schedule+0x73/0xc0
15:52:46: [<ffffffff811c92b0>] sync_buffer+0x40/0x50
15:52:46: [<ffffffff81539e9f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
15:52:46: [<ffffffff811c9270>] ? sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
15:52:46: [<ffffffff81539f48>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x90
15:52:46: [<ffffffff810a1530>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x50
15:52:46: [<ffffffff811c9266>] __wait_on_buffer+0x26/0x30
15:52:46: [<ffffffffa006efdf>] journal_commit_transaction+0x9df/0x12f0 [jbd]
15:52:46: [<ffffffff81089afc>] ? lock_timer_base+0x3c/0x70
15:52:46: [<ffffffff8108a6fb>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x7b/0xe0
15:52:46: [<ffffffffa0073ea5>] kjournald+0xe5/0x240 [jbd]
15:52:46: [<ffffffff810a14b0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
15:52:46: [<ffffffffa0073dc0>] ? kjournald+0x0/0x240 [jbd]
15:52:46: [<ffffffff810a101e>] kthread+0x9e/0xc0
15:52:46: [<ffffffff8100c28a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
15:52:46: [<ffffffff810a0f80>] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0
15:52:46: [<ffffffff8100c280>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 02/Nov/15 ]

Similar instance for tag 2.7.62, build# 3225
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e7c5aa40-7e43-11e5-9c23-5254006e85c2
Client console:

09:01:22:metabench     D 0000000000000001     0 11790  11789 0x00000080
09:01:23: ffff880079bf7ae8 0000000000000082 ffff880079bf7a98 ffffffffa028578e
09:01:23: 0000000000000000 0000000000000286 ffff880079bf7a78 ffff8800370392b0
09:01:23: ffff88007e4f4000 0000000100a0c635 ffff88007ade7068 ffff880079bf7fd8
09:01:23:Call Trace:
09:01:24: [<ffffffffa028578e>] ? xs_send_kvec+0x8e/0xa0 [sunrpc]
09:01:24: [<ffffffffa028a3e0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc]
09:01:24: [<ffffffffa028a422>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x42/0xa0 [sunrpc]
09:01:24: [<ffffffff815397ff>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
09:01:24: [<ffffffffa0283ecf>] ? xprt_release_xprt+0x5f/0x70 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa028a3e0>] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0xa0 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffff815398a8>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x90
09:01:25: [<ffffffff810a14e0>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x50
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa02803fc>] ? call_transmit+0x1ec/0x2c0 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa028a965>] __rpc_execute+0xf5/0x350 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffff81042fbc>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20
09:01:25: [<ffffffff810a12e7>] ? bit_waitqueue+0x17/0xd0
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa028ac21>] rpc_execute+0x61/0xa0 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa0281465>] rpc_run_task+0x75/0x90 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa0281582>] rpc_call_sync+0x42/0x70 [sunrpc]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa039792c>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper.clone.0+0x6c/0xc0 [nfs]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa0398493>] nfs3_do_create+0x43/0x90 [nfs]
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa0398734>] nfs3_proc_mkdir+0x94/0x120 [nfs]
09:01:25: [<ffffffff811ad4a2>] ? dput+0x32/0x160
09:01:25: [<ffffffffa03811ba>] nfs_mkdir+0x6a/0x120 [nfs]
09:01:26: [<ffffffff8119f1e5>] ? __lookup_hash+0x85/0x160
09:01:26: [<ffffffff812327ff>] ? security_inode_permission+0x1f/0x30
09:01:26: [<ffffffff811a0ef9>] vfs_mkdir+0xd9/0x140
09:01:26: [<ffffffff811a3c97>] sys_mkdirat+0xc7/0x1b0
09:01:26: [<ffffffff811977ce>] ? vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20
09:01:26: [<ffffffff811977f4>] ? sys_newlstat+0x24/0x50
09:01:26: [<ffffffff811a3d98>] sys_mkdir+0x18/0x20
09:01:26: [<ffffffff8100b0d2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 18/Dec/15 ]

Another instance for EL6.7 Server/EL6.7 Client - ZFS
Master, build# 3270
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a1cbfc82-a275-11e5-bdef-5254006e85c2

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:06:12 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.