[LU-7229] Interop 2.7.60<->2.7.0 - sanity-hsm test_60: Expected progress update after at least 5 seconds Created: 29/Sep/15 Updated: 09/Sep/16 Resolved: 02/Feb/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.8.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.8.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
Client : master branch/ build 3194, RHEL 7 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Saurabh Tandan <saurabh.tandan@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ea40cd80-62dd-11e5-b25a-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_60 failed with the following error: Expected progress update after at least 5 seconds Appears to be similar to 5242880 bytes copied in 3 seconds. sanity-hsm test_60: @@@@@@ FAIL: Expected progress update after at least 5 seconds |
| Comments |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 23/Dec/15 ] |
|
another on master: |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 30/Dec/15 ] |
|
I hit the problem on b2_5 too. From the log, the start time (1450902565.939239) and end time (1450902570.065967) is really on edge. That means, if time() function in copy tool rounds the second in different way with “date +%s” in the test script, this could cause some error. I'd suggest to relax the check in test script. 1450902555.749244 lhsmtool_posix[27518]: action=0 src=(null) dst=(null) mount_point=/mnt/lustre2 exiting: Terminated |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 30/Dec/15 ] |
|
Li Xi (lixi@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/17742 |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 30/Jan/16 ] |
|
I hit similar issue on test 16: == sanity-hsm test 16: Test CT bandwith control option == 14:26:05 (1454131565) |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 02/Feb/16 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/17742/ |
| Comment by Joseph Gmitter (Inactive) [ 02/Feb/16 ] |
|
Landed for 2.8 |
| Comment by Elena Gryaznova [ 07/Jul/16 ] |
|
> I hit similar issue on test 16: patch http://review.whamcloud.com/17742/ contains test_60 fix only. Thanks. |
| Comment by Elena Gryaznova [ 07/Jul/16 ] |
|
sorry for typo: s/ticket failed/ticket filled/ |