[LU-7242] Interop b2_5_fe<->master - sanity test_103a: permissions failed Created: 01/Oct/15 Updated: 11/Feb/21 Resolved: 11/Feb/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.8.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Bob Glossman (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
Client: b2_5_fe, 2.5.5-RC2--PRISTINE-2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Saurabh Tandan <saurabh.tandan@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ac54e522-6276-11e5-a45a-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_103a failed with the following error: permissions failed test log: [122] $ su daemon -- ok [123] $ echo daemon2 >> f -- ok [124] $ cat f -- ok [134] $ su bin -- ok [135] $ setfacl -m g:daemon:r f -- ok [137] $ su daemon -- ok [138] $ echo daemon3 >> f -- ok [145] $ su bin -- ok [146] $ setfacl -x g:daemon f -- ok [148] $ su daemon -- ok [149] $ echo daemon4 >> f -- ok [156] $ su -- ok [157] $ chgrp root f -- ok [159] $ su daemon -- ok [160] $ echo daemon5 >> f -- ok [161] $ cat f -- ok [172] $ su -- ok [173] $ setfacl -m g:bin:r,g:daemon:w f -- ok [175] $ su daemon -- ok [176] $ : < f -- failed ~ ? f: Permission denied Appears to be similar to |
| Comments |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 01/Oct/15 ] |
|
Appears to be similar to |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 20/Jan/16 ] |
|
Another instance found for interop : EL7 Server/2.5.5 Client |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 10/Feb/16 ] |
|
Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316 |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 24/Feb/16 ] |
|
Another instance found for interop - EL7 Server/2.5.5 Client, tag 2.7.90. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 18/Mar/16 ] |
|
Bob Could you please look into this one? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 11/Feb/21 ] |
|
We haven't seen this test for at least a year until a few days ago. Let's close this ticket and I will open a new ticket for the recent sanity test_103a failures. |