[LU-7255] sanity-lfsck test_10 FAIL: (16) unexpected status Created: 05/Oct/15 Updated: 15/Jun/23 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.8.0, Lustre 2.11.0, Lustre 2.10.7, Lustre 2.12.1, Lustre 2.10.8, Lustre 2.12.8 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | James Nunez (Inactive) | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||
| Description |
|
sanity-lfsck test 10 fails with ' (16) unexpected status'. Logs are at: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0b832922-6b10-11e5-ae45-5254006e85c2 From the test_log, it may be that the LSFCK namespace scan just didn't have enough time to complete because 'status: scanning-phase2', unless it's just hung in scanning-phase2. The LFSCK namespace output from the test_log: Update not seen after 32s: wanted 'completed' got 'scanning-phase2' CMD: shadow-4vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdd.lustre-MDT0000.lfsck_namespace name: lfsck_namespace magic: 0xa0621a0b version: 2 status: scanning-phase2 flags: scanned-once,inconsistent param: last_completed_time: 1443996764 time_since_last_completed: 105 seconds latest_start_time: 1443996809 time_since_latest_start: 60 seconds last_checkpoint_time: 1443996844 time_since_last_checkpoint: 25 seconds latest_start_position: 12, N/A, N/A last_checkpoint_position: 26097, [0x2000013a2:0x2:0x0], 0x2b5be1c15cced998 first_failure_position: N/A, N/A, N/A checked_phase1: 8077 checked_phase2: 4652 updated_phase1: 3990 updated_phase2: 4142 failed_phase1: 0 failed_phase2: 0 directories: 1004 dirent_repaired: 0 linkea_repaired: 3990 nlinks_repaired: 0 multiple_linked_checked: 6988 multiple_linked_repaired: 1 unknown_inconsistency: 0 unmatched_pairs_repaired: 0 dangling_repaired: 0 multiple_referenced_repaired: 0 bad_file_type_repaired: 0 lost_dirent_repaired: 0 local_lost_found_scanned: 0 local_lost_found_moved: 0 local_lost_found_skipped: 0 local_lost_found_failed: 0 striped_dirs_scanned: 0 striped_dirs_repaired: 0 striped_dirs_failed: 0 striped_dirs_disabled: 0 striped_dirs_skipped: 0 striped_shards_scanned: 0 striped_shards_repaired: 0 striped_shards_failed: 0 striped_shards_skipped: 0 name_hash_repaired: 0 success_count: 1 run_time_phase1: 35 seconds run_time_phase2: 24 seconds average_speed_phase1: 230 items/sec average_speed_phase2: 193 objs/sec average_speed_total: 215 items/sec real_time_speed_phase1: N/A real_time_speed_phase2: 197 objs/sec current_position: [0x2000013a1:0x9da:0x0] sanity-lfsck test_10: @@@@@@ FAIL: (16) unexpected status |
| Comments |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 16/Dec/15 ] |
|
Server: Master, Build# 3266, Tag 2.7.64 , RHEL 7 |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/16 ] |
|
Another instance found for interop : EL6.7 Server/2.5.5 Client |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 10/Feb/16 ] |
|
Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL6.7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 24/Mar/22 ] |
|
This subtest is failing very intermittently - 38 failures with this "unexpected status" message in the past 9 months, 8 failures in the past 4 weeks. |
| Comment by Alexander Zarochentsev [ 15/Dec/22 ] |
|
+1 hit https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/9163c092-9b77-4b94-a28f-6f95570f4a9d |
| Comment by Serguei Smirnov [ 15/Jun/23 ] |
|
+1 on master: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50222a23-a8ca-43d7-9401-35c9c70002d4 |