[LU-80] Wide striping support Created: 09/Feb/11  Updated: 11/Jan/19  Resolved: 02/May/12

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.0.0, Lustre 2.1.0, Lustre 1.8.6
Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.2.0

Type: New Feature Priority: Minor
Reporter: Oleg Drokin Assignee: Patrick Farrell (Inactive)
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: None

Attachments: PDF File LUG-2011-Widestriping.pdf     PDF File Wide Striping Test Plan.pdf     File kern.log     File mds1.tar.gz     Text File mdtest_xattr.patch    
Issue Links:
Related
is related to LU-2348 e2image produce invalid image for a l... Resolved
is related to LU-908 multi-block xattr support Resolved
Bugzilla ID: 4,424
Rank (Obsolete): 4227

 Description   

ORNL wants to have ability to stripe file across more than 160 OSTs.

There is a number of patches in the bugzilla bug, but they are not totally complete for 2.x and there are some known issues.
Interop is also still a concern.



 Comments   
Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 09/Feb/11 ]

Oleg, all of these tracking bugs should contain a URL for the bugzilla bug, in this case:

https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424

so that the patches and comments can be found easily.

Comment by Oleg Drokin [ 09/Feb/11 ]

Actually it does. See "Bugzilla ID field" in Details.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Aug/11 ]

Recent discussion has moved this to a new feature in Lustre 2.2. Previous test for this feature has revealed incompatiablity issues with previous versions which lacked support for large stripe count due to not being able to handle more than one page of stripe data. Parts of the large stripe support have already gone into the master branch for 2.1 so the next set of patches will ensure Lustre 2.1 will be able to support properly large stripe count on future lustre 2.2 servers.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 08/Aug/11 ]

I have Lustre 2.1 client support patch at

http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1194

Full client and server support is at

http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1111

Eventual full support will be based on top of the client support.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 22/Sep/11 ]

I have been told that Xyrtex also has a widw stripe patch. Could someone from Xyrtex confirm this?

Comment by Nathan Rutman [ 03/Oct/11 ]

Xyratex has a wide striping design, but it's not clear that we should pursue this. I'll post the design and the discussion to lustre-devel.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 09/Nov/11 ]

Comments and instructions from Andreas:

As per bug 4424 comment #112 and comment #272, the following improvements need to be made on the existing large EA patch for ext4 and e2fsprogs so as to get the patch and changes accepted and included into the upstream kernel ext4 and e2fsprogs:

1) EA value will be stored in an external inode if value_size > blocksize instead of 1/2 blocksize.
There is no point to move the EA value to an external inode if it would fit into the xattr block. This is doubly true with the next change, to allow multiple blocks for xattrs without having to resort to a separate inode.

2) Increase EA space by allocating a single chunk of up to 64kB/blocksize contiguous xattr blocks and storing the block count in ext4_xattr_header->h_blocks.
To decide how many blocks to be allocated at once, Andreas suggested to just allocate the required number of xattr blocks, and in the rare case where we need to increase the xattr space we can try to reallocate, or simply fail with ENOSPC. This is no worse than the current code if it runs out of space with the single xattr block.

The change to the xattr blocks should be completely transparent to Lustre. ldiskfs can still continue to advertise the maximum xattr size larger than the 64kB which will fit into the external block range, but for most of our uses we will not need more than 64kB. Even the wide striping patch will currently only need 32kB for the 1350-stripe limit. Avoiding the use of the external inode will likely improve performance significantly.

As for testing, the normal way to handle this is to add support to ext4 and create a small test filesystem with a multi-block xattr by mounting it with ext4/ldiskfs (nojournal to save space) and using setfattr with a large xattr, use getfattr to verify it works.

3) Then, add support to e2fsprogs and e2fsck in order to check that the multi-block xattr is correct, and then save the image to the e2fsprogs (something like tests/f_xattr_blocks/image.gz) subdirectory and running the e2fsprogs e2fsck test script on it.

The e2fsprogs "f_xattrs_blocks" image should include several different inodes:

  • xattr blocks with size nearly 64kB (- xattr headers, should pass)
  • xattr blocks with multiple xattrs > 4kB (should pass)
  • xattr blocks with many small xattrs (should pass)
  • xattr blocks that points to completely incorrect block (no header/magic)
    (should clear xattr block from inode, bitmap)
  • xattr blocks not set in bitmap (should validate xattr, set blocks in bitmap)
  • xattr blocks that points to correct block number, some blocks shared with file
    (should invoke duplicate block pass 1b to clone blocks)
  • xattr block overlapping with inode table (should clone in pass 1b)
  • any other failure cases you can think of

There is already a test case for the external xattr inode, that should stay.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 11/Nov/11 ]

For increasing EA space by allocating contiguous xattr blocks, there were two questions brought up by Kalpak in bug 4424 comment #112:

1) Since we will have 64KB EA space, we will need to allocate 64KB buffers to read in the EA space. This way a lot of the code will remain as-is, since most of the macros/functions assume that EA space is contiguous(as was with single EA block). Will allocation of such large buffers(even with vmalloc) lead to any problems?

2) We won't be using refcount for EA blocks any more. Any problems with this? Should we think about removing the entire mb_cache code or at least disable mb_cache when not needed?

For question 1), I wonder whether it's a feasible way or not:
In fs/ext4/xattr.c, sb_bread() is used to read the single xattr block data from the block device and return the buffer head associated with its block buffer, and all of the ext4_xattr_block_* functions are performed through the buffer head on the block buffer. So, if there were multiple xattr blocks, the data of them would be read into different block buffers, which are likely not contiguous.

In order to make most of the existing macros/functions (which assume the xattr space is contiguous) unchanged, we could allocate a contiguous large buffer to handle all of the data. However, we have to memcpy the data from block buffers to the large buffer, and after the data are changed, we have to memcpy the data back to the block buffers to make the data written into the block device.

Is this way reasonable? Or is handling the noncontiguous multiple block buffers the only way?

For question 2), the h_refcount field in struct ext4_xattr_header is used as a reference count for multiple inodes sharing the same xattr block. Is there any reason for not using this field any more?

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 13/Nov/11 ]

Since the caller will already be allocating a buffer for reads, it seems (without just now looking at the code, tired) that it should be possible to read the xattr in block-sized pieces and copy them into the user buffer. This will also fix the problem with misalignment of the data in the disk buffer.

To be clear, I'm thinking of expanding the xattr storage space from the single external xattr up to many small xattrs in the same large external block. I don't think the large xattr block should be only for a single large xattr.

As for the refcount on the external block - I would just leave things as it is today instead of making too many changes.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 15/Nov/11 ]

Since the caller will already be allocating a buffer for reads, it seems (without just now looking at the code, tired) that it should be possible to read the xattr in block-sized pieces and copy them into the user buffer. This will also fix the problem with misalignment of the data in the disk buffer.

Yes, for ext4_xattr_list() and ext4_xattr_get(), a buffer is already provided for storing the xattr names and values mem-copied from the in-inode xattr space and external xattr block buffer(s).

However, for ext4_xattr_set() and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(), all of the functions called by them assume the xattr space is contiguous with entries growing downwards and values growing upwards (aligned to the end of the space). The create, replace, remove and shift operations of xattrs are all performed inside a contiguous buffer. It's no problem with single xattr block. But for multiple blocks, since the data of them would be read into different block buffers, which are likely not contiguous, almost all of the existing functions need to be changed. So, this is my question 1) above.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 18/Nov/11 ]

It would be possible to handle this in the code by handling xattr values that span multiple buffers, which is ignored in the common case because the buffer size should be <= blocksize. However, I don't know how complex this would be. It might also be worthwhile to ask on the ext4 list if anyone has a good idea of how to solve this. I hope their solution is not to require limiting the single xattr size to 4kB or less...

It might also make sense to ask on the linux-ext4 list if anyone has a good solution for this issue.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 18/Nov/11 ]

It might also make sense to ask on the linux-ext4 list if anyone has a good solution for this issue.

OK, will do.

For the external inode patch, I rebased the ext4-large-eas.patch from http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 on the latest upstream ext4 codes (parent: 5c8a0fbb), made the following changes and pushed it to http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 for review:

  1. change ext4_set_aops(inode) to ext4_set_aops(ea_inode) in ext4_xattr_inode_create()
  2. add unlock_new_inode(ea_inode) into ext4_xattr_inode_create()
  3. replace (EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_feature_incompat & EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE) with
    EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE)
  4. store the EA value in an external inode if value_size > blocksize instead of 1/2 blocksize
Comment by James A Simmons [ 18/Nov/11 ]

No ldisk-series file changes?

Comment by Jian Yu [ 18/Nov/11 ]

No ldisk-series file changes?

Sorry for the confusion. The patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 is intended to be sent to linux-ext4, so I did not add the changes for ldiskfs series files. As I did not know how to submit ext4 changes to Gerrit for review, I still used ldiskfs directory.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 18/Nov/11 ]

I have two bugs to work on but as soon as I'm done I was test your patch.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 18/Nov/11 ]

I have two bugs to work on but as soon as I'm done I was test your patch.

Thanks James!

Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Nov/11 ]

It would be possible to handle this in the code by handling xattr values that span multiple buffers, which is ignored in the common case because the buffer size should be <= blocksize. However, I don't know how complex this would be. It might also be worthwhile to ask on the ext4 list if anyone has a good idea of how to solve this. I hope their solution is not to require limiting the single xattr size to 4kB or less...

Threads on the linux-ext4 list:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg29059.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg29061.html

The solution is to support handling xattr data among non-contiguous block buffers.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 25/Nov/11 ]

Existing patch patches/e2fsprogs-large-ea.patch for e2fsprogs have some errors with external inode.
First error at function check_ea_in_inode(), this code try to delete xattr because size of the EA at extarnal inode is more than storage_size (size of the data for xattr at inode).

storage_size = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(ctx->fs->super) -
EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE - inode->i_extra_isize;
/* Value size cannot be larger than EA space in inode */
if (entry->e_value_offs > storage_size ||
entry->e_value_offs + entry->e_value_size > storage_size) {
problem = PR_1_INODE_EA_BAD_VALUE;
goto fix;
}
Same error exist at debugfs source.
"(entry->e_value_inum == 0 && " should be added to if.

Second at e2fsck_lfsck_find_ea(), there is no copy lmm for external inode.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 25/Nov/11 ]

attach mds1.tar.gz - disk image of MDT with file wich have ea at external inode

Comment by James A Simmons [ 29/Nov/11 ]

I see the patch is not ready for testing yet.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 29/Nov/11 ]

I see the patch is not ready for testing yet.

Right, the patches in http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 and http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 need to be revised and rebased on the current master branch. I've started on this and just uploaded a full patchset to change #1111 for review and testing.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 30/Nov/11 ]

So the approach for testing should be everything in one patch i.e http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 instead of breaking it into smaller patches?

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 30/Nov/11 ]

I upload my version of patch based on previos James Simons patch http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1757. It has more fixes than Yu Jian`s patch.
1) Fixed endians in the ext4 patch
2) Removed changes not related to wide stripe, like lustre/lvfs/fsfilt_ext3.c or liblustre.c changes.
3) Maximum OST number increased up to 2K
4) Reply buffer size shrinking removed,
because no client side support for this code
5) Fixed MDS buffer size
For test you need MDS_MKFS_OPTS="--mkfsoptions=-O\ large_xattr\ -J\ size=200"
Journal size should be >= OSTs num / 2 + 2.
Previos versions of clients support new version of server, and work perfect with file, but have minor defect at lfs.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 30/Nov/11 ]

Can we try to keep the code under the same ChangeId; make life easier. Also I like the idea of handling the xattr rpc packets with dynamic buffers. We can base it on the code in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1178

Comment by Jian Yu [ 01/Dec/11 ]

Hi Alexander,
I saw you just resubmitted the patches from http://review.whamcloud.com/1757 to http://review.whamcloud.com/1111. Are you also going to split the patches into separate pieces per the following suggestions from Andreas?

"I would actually prefer if this patch were split into separate pieces, for ldiskfs large xattrs (this change 1111), the client code (change 1194), and the RPC size changes (a new change). This will make inspection considerably easier."

Comment by James A Simmons [ 01/Dec/11 ]

In that case lets break up the patch.

http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1194 with ChangeId Idbaeb989 can be used for the client changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1111 with ChangeId I42e1aad3 can be used for the lov changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1708 with ChangeId Ic08921cf can be used for the ldiskfs changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1757 with ChangeId I6f13d709 can be used for the dynamic buffers.

How does that sound to everyone?

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 01/Dec/11 ]

Yes, I can push client side changes to gerrit, but I don`t want to do it right now, cause inspectors didn`t agree with my point about this patch. Code is shared between client and server. Inspection and fix in one place(1 request) is better. After inspection we can separate client code.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 01/Dec/11 ]

Hi James,

Also I like the idea of handling the xattr rpc packets with dynamic buffers. We can base it on the code in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1178

Are you going to port the patches to master branch or would you like me to do so?

I just wanna avoid duplicating works among Alexander, you and me.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 02/Dec/11 ]

James, I think, to separate ldiskfs patch is good idea, cause it can be tested without other changes. Xattr with size more than 2K go to external inode (80 OST). Any reason why this size is 2K? May be 4k(160OST) is better for performance with less number of OSTs?

Comment by Jian Yu [ 02/Dec/11 ]

Hi Alexander,

Xattr with size more than 2K go to external inode (80 OST). Any reason why this size is 2K? May be 4k(160OST) is better for performance with less number of OSTs?

In http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 patch set 3 and http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 patch set 1, this has been changed to store the xattr value in an external inode if value_size > blocksize instead of 1/2 blocksize, which was also mentioned in the above comments in this ticket.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 02/Dec/11 ]

Ok, but current version of code (blocksize) have bug. Xattr block store header, entry, value. If
size of lov xattr < 4096 && ( size of lov xattr + header + entry ) > 4096
then -ENOSPC would be return.

Comment by Peter Jones [ 02/Dec/11 ]

YuJian

I suggest that you signal ahead of time what work that you intend to do next (to allow anyone else who is duplicating effort with you a chance to speak up) but then proceed- we want to ensure that this feature remains moving forward.

Thanks

Peter

Comment by Jian Yu [ 04/Dec/11 ]

I suggest that you signal ahead of time what work that you intend to do next (to allow anyone else who is duplicating effort with you a chance to speak up) but then proceed- we want to ensure that this feature remains moving forward.

OK, Peter.

James and Alexander, I'm going port the patches for dynamic buffers in http://review.whamcloud.com/1178 to master branch and then start testing on the ldiskfs patches in http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 first.

After Alexander makes the client and lov patches in http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 pass inspections, I would also test the whole feature.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 05/Dec/11 ]

I like to break up the client and lov patches. The reason for this is that I like to test the lov changes without clients supporting wide stripe. I can continue on my client work while Alex does the lov work.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 06/Dec/11 ]

I like to break up the client and lov patches. The reason for this is that I like to test the lov changes without clients supporting wide stripe. I can continue on my client work while Alex does the lov work.

Thanks James. Alexander has split the client and lov changes. Could you please update http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 with client changes?

While porting http://review.whamcloud.com/1178 to master branch, I hit some conflicts. I'm still working on resolving them.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 06/Dec/11 ]

Updated the client side patch. Running auster to find any regressions. Will send up once I'm done testing.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 07/Dec/11 ]

Okay I did some basic testing of the client side work and it appears to have no regressions. The utilities code needs some serious cleanup. I'm, going to test all the patches togther now on out test bed to a see if large stripe functions.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 08/Dec/11 ]

I see the buuer resize is loocated in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1808. Will give it a try.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 08/Dec/11 ]

I see the buuer resize is loocated in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1808. Will give it a try.

Yes, James, please try the latest patch set.

So, finally, the patches were split into four components and located in:

http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 for the client changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 for the lov changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 for the ldiskfs changes.
http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 for the mds changes.

I'll start the testing today.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 09/Dec/11 ]

Hi,
I have done performance testing for ldiskfs patch. I use loop device (mount -t ldiskfs -o loop /tmp/mdt1 /media) and patched mdtest ( create and read xattr) options -x(xattr_size)
test command:
./mdtest -u -d /media/mdtest/ -F -i 10 -n10000 -x[100,1000,5000]

xattr size create stat remove
no xattr 61135.22 832585.519 114361.449
in file inode(<10OST) 51813.351 383421.386 116157.718
in block(<166OST) 45267.554 376525.103 101652.188
in external inode(>166OST) 24762.15 184546.305 60277.422

So, external inode xattr has two times less performance than block xattr for creat, stat and remove operation.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 09/Dec/11 ]

Alex can you post the patch for mdtest. I really like to also do some benchmarking as well on our cray test system with the non-loop file system.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 09/Dec/11 ]

While setting up a file system using the test suite I discovered the MKFSOPT doesn't work as expected.
When I changed MKFSOPT="" to MKFSOPT="-O uninit_bg,dir_nlink,huge_file,flex_bg,large_xattr" it failed to build the MDT. I have a fix to which can be applied to local.sh. Should I posted the fix under LU-80 or open a new JIRA ticket?

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 09/Dec/11 ]

patch for mdtest, add option -x(xattr_size), to create read xattr.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 09/Dec/11 ]

The mkfs fix should go into a separate bug. Note also that with new mkfs.lustre I think you don't need to specify all if the features again, only the new ones.

Cheers, Andreas

Comment by James A Simmons [ 09/Dec/11 ]

With all the patches I began to see test regressions. I I tracked to down to the dynamic buffer patch, http://review.whamcloud.com/1808. Below is one of the test I have been failing.

== sanity test 24u: create stripe file =============================================================== 12:23:32 (1323451412)
error on ioctl 0x4008669a for '/lustre/barry/f24u' (3): Numerical result out of range
write: Bad file descriptor
sanity test_24u: @@@@@@ FAIL:

I turned on full debugging and uploaded the logs to uploads/LU-80/sanity-LU-80-1808.tar.bz2 for this test.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 09/Dec/11 ]

Alexander,
the performance degradation that you are seeing with large xattrs is likely due to the need to create an extra inode for any xattr over 4kB. There is a plan to implement "mid-sized" xattrs (up to 64kB) by referencing them directly from the xattr block pointer. This was requested by the upstream ext4 maintainer before accepting the large xattr patches into mainline Linux.

Yu Jian, since the 64kB "mid-sized" xattrs are not included in the current patch set, can you please file a separate bug with the comments from this bug related to that work so that it can be tracked separately.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 11/Dec/11 ]

Yu Jian, since the 64kB "mid-sized" xattrs are not included in the current patch set, can you please file a separate bug with the comments from this bug related to that work so that it can be tracked separately.

Sure, I created LU-908 for tracking this work.

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 12/Dec/11 ]

James, what about testing result without dynamic buffer patch?

Comment by James A Simmons [ 12/Dec/11 ]

Its looking very good. I haven't seen any regressions.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 13/Dec/11 ]

The dynamic buffer patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 still did not pass the basic regression tests. Tappro is working on updating the patches.

I just finished testing the ldiskfs patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 by running revised xfstests #020 and #062. The tests passed.

I'm going to start the testing on the combined patches without the dynamic buffer patch.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 15/Dec/11 ]

Hi James and Alexander,
FYI, while testing the combined patches, I'm updating/adding some regression test cases in the auster test suite, and will submit the changes to Gerrit soon.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 15/Dec/11 ]

Just tested the regression I seen with the dynamic buffering and they stopped failing. Looking good.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 16/Dec/11 ]

FYI, while testing the combined patches, I'm updating/adding some regression test cases in the auster test suite, and will submit the changes to Gerrit soon.

Test changes are in: http://review.whamcloud.com/1880

Comment by James A Simmons [ 19/Dec/11 ]

Alex for xattr option, does that only work as root. FAILED in create_remove_items_helper, unable to create xatrr trusted.lov: Operation not permitted is the error I'm seeing

Comment by Alexander Boyko [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Only cap_sys_admin have access to create trusted xattr. But you can create like

touch /media/mdtest/123
setfattr -n "user.123" -v "1233453457" /media/mdtest/1234
Comment by Jian Yu [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Current status of the patches:

component gerrit link status
ldiskfs http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 minor fixups needed, pending auto testing, passed manual testing
utils http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 some fixups needed
lov http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 passed review from Andreas, pending auto testing
mds http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 pending reviews, pending auto testing
tests http://review.whamcloud.com/1880 pending reviews, pending auto testing, passed manual testing
e2fsprogs http://review.whamcloud.com/1886 pending reviews
Comment by James A Simmons [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Oops on the MDS when using 1.8.X clients

Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Dec/11 ]

Oops on the MDS when using 1.8.X clients

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000001c RIP:
[<ffffffff88eba171>] :mdt:mdt_dump_lmm+0x21/0x230
PGD 41b29d067 PUD 41b29c067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
last sysfs file: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/irq
CPU 4
Modules linked in: cmm(U) osd_ldiskfs(U) mdt(U) mdd(U) mds(U) fsfilt_ldiskfs(U) exportfs mgc(U) lustre(U) lov(U) osc(U) lquota(U) mdc(U) fid(U) fld(U) ko2iblnd(U) ptlrpc(U) obdclass(U) lnet(U) lvfs(U) libcfs(U) ldiskfs(U) jbd2 crc16 ipmi_si mpt2sas mptctl dell_rbu autofs4 ib_srp(U) ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ipt_REJECT xt_tcpudp xt_state ip_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables be2iscsi iscsi_tcp bnx2i cnic uio libiscsi_tcp libiscsi2 scsi_transport_iscsi2 scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_ucm(U) ib_sdp(U) rdma_cm(U) iw_cm(U) ib_addr(U) ib_ipoib(U) ipoib_helper(U) ib_cm(U) ib_sa(U) ipv6 xfrm_nalgo crypto_api ib_uverbs(U) ib_umad(U) iw_nes(U) iw_cxgb3(U) cxgb3(U) ib_qib(U) dca mlx4_ib(U) mlx4_en(U) mlx4_core(U) dm_mirror dm_log dm_multipath scsi_dh dm_mod raid0 raid1 video backlight sbs power_meter hwmon i2c_ec i2c_core dell_wmi wmi button battery asus_acpi acpi_memhotplug ac parport_pc lp parport sd_mod sr_mod cdrom sg mptsas mptscsih ib_mthca(U) mptbase ata_piix libata uhci_hcd tpm_tis pcspkr i5000_edac ehci_hcd scsi_transport_sas ib_mad(U) tpm shpchp tpm_bios ib_core(U) scsi_mod edac_mc serio_raw nfs nfs_acl lockd fscache sunrpc bnx2
Pid: 5880, comm: mdt_03 Tainted: G      2.6.18-238.19.1.el5.head #1
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff88eba171>]  [<ffffffff88eba171>] :mdt:mdt_dump_lmm+0x21/0x230
RSP: 0018:ffff81018d6a3810  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffc2001a175140 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8102dea59190
RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000040
RBP: ffff81018d6a3870 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8102416a7dc0
R13: 0000000000000040 R14: ffff810419763110 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00002ad72ec356e0(0000) GS:ffff81010ef50240(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 000000041e41a000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process mdt_03 (pid: 5880, threadinfo ffff81018d6a2000, task ffff81041d768080)
Stack:  ffff81018d6a3870 ffffffff88f372b2 ffffc2001a175218 ffff81043c5e7a48
0000000000000002 ffff8104197630f8 ffff8102416a7dc0 ffff8104197630f8
ffff8102416a7dc0 ffff810419763000 ffff810419763110 ffff81043c5e7a48
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff88f372b2>] :cmm:cml_attr_get+0x112/0x190
[<ffffffff88eace4f>] :mdt:mdt_getattr_internal+0x67f/0xd90
[<ffffffff88a0dda7>] :obdclass:class_handle2object+0xd7/0x170
[<ffffffff88eaebbc>] :mdt:mdt_getattr_name_lock+0x165c/0x1a90
[<ffffffff88afff10>] :ptlrpc:lustre_msg_buf+0x0/0x80
[<ffffffff88aff413>] :ptlrpc:lustre_msg_get_flags+0x23/0x80
[<ffffffff88eaf622>] :mdt:mdt_intent_getattr+0x312/0x4a0
[<ffffffff88eaa138>] :mdt:mdt_unpack_req_pack_rep+0x588/0x6c0
[<ffffffff88b011f0>] :ptlrpc:lustre_swab_ldlm_intent+0x0/0x10
[<ffffffff88eb6577>] :mdt:mdt_intent_policy+0x467/0x650 
[<ffffffff88abe209>] :ptlrpc:ldlm_lock_enqueue+0x179/0xa00
[<ffffffff88ada720>] :ptlrpc:ldlm_export_lock_get+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffff88951521>] :libcfs:cfs_hash_bd_add_locked+0x71/0x80
[<ffffffff88954edd>] :libcfs:cfs_hash_add+0x17d/0x190
[<ffffffff88adca2b>] :ptlrpc:ldlm_handle_enqueue0+0x9eb/0xff0
[<ffffffff88ea9c39>] :mdt:mdt_unpack_req_pack_rep+0x89/0x6c0
[<ffffffff88eb59d2>] :mdt:mdt_enqueue+0x72/0x100
[<ffffffff88eab456>] :mdt:mdt_handle_common+0x11e6/0x1750
[<ffffffff88a30361>] :obdclass:keys_fill+0x51/0x100
[<ffffffff88eaba90>] :mdt:mdt_regular_handle+0x10/0x20
[<ffffffff88b0b947>] :ptlrpc:ptlrpc_server_handle_request+0x897/0xe90
<~snip~>

It seems this is related to the following changes in dynamic buffer patches http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 :

diff --git a/lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c b/lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
index 1398f1e..7da5144 100644
--- a/lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
+++ b/lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
@@ -499,8 +499,11 @@ static int mdt_getattr_internal(struct mdt_thread_info *info,
                 RETURN(0);
         }

-        buffer->lb_buf = req_capsule_server_get(pill, &RMF_MDT_MD);
-        buffer->lb_len = req_capsule_get_size(pill, &RMF_MDT_MD, RCL_SERVER);
+        buffer->lb_len = reqbody->eadatasize;
+        if (buffer->lb_len > 0)
+                buffer->lb_buf = req_capsule_server_get(pill, &RMF_MDT_MD);
+        else
+                buffer->lb_buf = NULL;

Tappro, could you please take a look at this issue? Thanks!

Comment by Jian Yu [ 23/Dec/11 ]

Oops on the MDS when using 1.8.X clients

James, fyi, Tappro updated the dynamic buffer patches in http://review.whamcloud.com/1808.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 27/Dec/11 ]

Current testing status:

A full auster test run was finished on the latest version of the combined patches (http://review.whamcloud.com/1842 patch set 4):

One regression issue was hit on ost-pools test 25, which was caused by the utils patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1194. James is working on a new patch. (Thanks James!)

Another test run is being performed on 200 OSTs against the same combined patches:

So far, parallel-scale (which wraps compilebench, metabench, simul, mdtest, connectathon, ior, cascading_rw, write_append_truncate, write_disjoint, statahead) has passed (stripe count was -1 while running ior). The sanity-benchmark test (which wraps dbench, bonnie++, iozone, fsx, pios) is ongoing (stripe count is -1 while running bonnie++, iozone and fsx).

Comment by James A Simmons [ 27/Dec/11 ]

The ost pool test are really broken for the case when the MGS and MDS are on separate servers. I will track down those problems at a latter time.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 28/Dec/11 ]

Updated my client side patch. Works on my end but give it a try.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 28/Dec/11 ]

> The sanity-benchmark test (which wraps dbench, bonnie++, iozone, fsx, pios) is ongoing (stripe count is -1 while running bonnie++, iozone and fsx).

dbench, bonnie++ and fsx tests passed.

However, while running the iozone test, I found the filesystem space was not freed after writing, reading and removing the iozone test file. I tried to reproduce this issue on 40 OSTs (each with 200MB in size):
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ffb0e9bc-3162-11e1-9c6d-5254004bbbd3

Before running iozone:

+ lfs df
UUID                   1K-blocks        Used   Available Use% Mounted on
lustre-MDT0000_UUID      2999248      178692     2620556   6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0]
lustre-OST0000_UUID       187464       24764      152636  14% /mnt/lustre[OST:0]
lustre-OST0001_UUID       187464       24764      152636  14% /mnt/lustre[OST:1]
lustre-OST0002_UUID       187464       24764      152636  14% /mnt/lustre[OST:2]
lustre-OST0003_UUID       187464       24764      152636  14% /mnt/lustre[OST:3]
......
filesystem summary:      7498560      990560     6105440  14% /mnt/lustre

After running iozone and removing the test file:

+ du -sh /mnt/lustre
12K	/mnt/lustre
+ lfs df
UUID                   1K-blocks        Used   Available Use% Mounted on
lustre-MDT0000_UUID      2999248      179660     2619588   6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0]
lustre-OST0000_UUID       187464      139456       32312  81% /mnt/lustre[OST:0]
lustre-OST0001_UUID       187464      139456       32312  81% /mnt/lustre[OST:1]
lustre-OST0002_UUID       187464      139456       35384  80% /mnt/lustre[OST:2]
lustre-OST0003_UUID       187464      139456       32312  81% /mnt/lustre[OST:3]
......
filesystem summary:      7498560     5569536     1331904  81% /mnt/lustre

The objects on OSTs were not unlinked.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 29/Dec/11 ]

> Updated my client side patch. Works on my end but give it a try.

The ost-pools test 25 still failed when the OST count was less than 10:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c5e587d4-31de-11e1-b7bd-5254004bbbd3

Since we support adding the same OST into different pools, the pool count could be larger than the OST count.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 29/Dec/11 ]

Thank you I couldn't duplicate the failure you where seeing.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 29/Dec/11 ]

> Thank you I couldn't duplicate the failure you where seeing.

The issue could be reproduced as follows:
Suppose we have 4 OSTs, if we created 5 OST pools, then running "lctl pool_list $FSNAME" on the MGS node would return EOVERFLOW.

For example, on the MGS node:

[root@wc0007 ~]# lctl dl
  0 UP mgs MGS MGS 11
  1 UP mgc MGC10.45.1.7@tcp df05e19a-f3b1-9a66-6002-af7f79f26b6e 5
  2 UP lov lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov_UUID 4
  3 UP mdt lustre-MDT0000 lustre-MDT0000_UUID 7
  4 UP mds mdd_obd-lustre-MDT0000 mdd_obd_uuid-lustre-MDT0000 3
  5 UP osc lustre-OST0000-osc-MDT0000 lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov_UUID 5
  6 UP osc lustre-OST0001-osc-MDT0000 lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov_UUID 5
  7 UP osc lustre-OST0002-osc-MDT0000 lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov_UUID 5
  8 UP osc lustre-OST0003-osc-MDT0000 lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov_UUID 5
[root@wc0007 ~]# for i in $(seq 5); do lctl pool_new lustre.pool$i && sync && lctl pool_list lustre; done
Pool lustre.pool1 created
Pools from lustre:
lustre.pool1
Pool lustre.pool2 created
Pools from lustre:
lustre.pool2
lustre.pool1
Pool lustre.pool3 created
Pools from lustre:
lustre.pool3
lustre.pool2
lustre.pool1
Pool lustre.pool4 created
Pools from lustre:
lustre.pool4
lustre.pool3
lustre.pool2
lustre.pool1
Pool lustre.pool5 created
Pools from lustre:
[root@wc0007 ~]# echo $?
75

The utils patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 would get the value of "numobd" (the real OST count) and pass it to llapi_get_poollist(), then if the pool count was larger than the real OST count, llapi_get_poollist() would return -EOVERFLOW:

        /* check output bounds */
        if (nb_entries >= list_size)
                return -EOVERFLOW;
Comment by James A Simmons [ 29/Dec/11 ]

Just to make sure for setup_obd_indexes for the function llapi_lov_get_uuids the allocated buffer uuids should be equal to "numobd" * sizeof(struct obd_uuid)

Comment by Jian Yu [ 29/Dec/11 ]

> The objects on OSTs were not unlinked.

Here is a report which contains the full debug logs:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a2f4c3e0-321d-11e1-b7bd-5254004bbbd3

Debug log on the client node (wc0005) showed that:

00000080:00000001:7.0:1325162199.607929:0:22075:0:(namei.c:1042:ll_objects_destroy()) Process entered
00000080:00000001:7.0:1325162199.607929:0:22075:0:(namei.c:1047:ll_objects_destroy()) Process leaving (rc=0 : 0 : 0)
00000100:00000001:7.0:1325162199.607931:0:22075:0:(client.c:2184:__ptlrpc_req_finished()) Process entered
00000100:00000040:7.0:1325162199.607932:0:22075:0:(client.c:2196:__ptlrpc_req_finished()) @@@ refcount now 1  req@ffff880199321000 x1389532891058769/t4294967339(4294967339) o36->lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880413891c00@10.45.1.7@tcp:12/10 lens 456/424 e 0 to 0 dl 1325162206 ref 2 fl Complete:R/4/0 rc 0/0
00000100:00000001:7.0:1325162199.607937:0:22075:0:(client.c:2203:__ptlrpc_req_finished()) Process leaving (rc=0 : 0 : 0)
00000080:00000001:7.0:1325162199.607938:0:22075:0:(namei.c:1146:ll_unlink_generic()) Process leaving (rc=0 : 0 : 0)

As we can see, ll_objects_destroy() did not run into obd_unpackmd() and obd_destroy(), it returned 0 directly from the following codes:

int ll_objects_destroy(struct ptlrpc_request *request, struct inode *dir)
{
        ......
        ENTRY;

        /* req is swabbed so this is safe */
        body = req_capsule_server_get(&request->rq_pill, &RMF_MDT_BODY);
        if (!(body->valid & OBD_MD_FLEASIZE))
                RETURN(0);
        ......
}

OBD_MD_FLEASIZE flag was not set.

Tappro, could you please take a look at this issue? Thanks! (BTW, the issue could be reproduced consistently.)

Comment by James A Simmons [ 29/Dec/11 ]

Done with the basic regression testing. All the test pass except for sanity 27z. I placed full debugging logs at /uploads/LU-80/sanity-1325181549.tar.bz2

Comment by James A Simmons [ 30/Dec/11 ]

Attempted to mount the large stripe file system (1036 OST) to a cray 1.8.4 client. On the MGS side I only saw this log.

Lustre: 3088:0:(ldlm_lib.c:909:target_handle_connect()) MGS: connection from a90c2cfa-2775-9658-e64f-8b54150021e1@30@gni t0 exp 0000000000000000 cur 1325257964 last 0
Lustre: import MGS->NET_0xd00000000001e_UUID netid 50001: select flavor null
Lustre: 3088:0:(ldlm_lib.c:634:target_handle_reconnect()) MGS: a90c2cfa-2775-9658-e64f-8b54150021e1 reconnecting
Lustre: 3088:0:(ldlm_lib.c:909:target_handle_connect()) MGS: connection from a90c2cfa-2775-9658-e64f-8b54150021e1@30@gni t0 exp ffff8105efcc6400 cur 1325258126 last 1325258126
LustreError: 3088:0:(obd_class.h:522:obd_set_info_async()) obd_set_info_async: dev 0 no operation
Lustre: import MGS->NET_0xd00000000001e_UUID netid 50001: select flavor null

On the client the log reported

Lustre: MGC10.37.248.56@o2ib1: Reactivating import
Lustre: Server MGS version (2.1.52.0) is much newer than client version (1.8.4)
Lustre: 17600:0:(obd_config.c:1127:class_config_llog_handler()) skipping 'lmv' config: cmd=cf001,clilmv:lmv
Lustre: 17600:0:(obd_config.c:1127:class_config_llog_handler()) Skipped 2 previous similar messages
Lustre: 17600:0:(obd_config.c:1127:class_config_llog_handler()) skipping 'lmv' config: cmd=cf003,clilmv:
Lustre: 17600:0:(client.c:1487:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request x1388334453463212 sent from MGC10.37.248.56@o2ib1 to NID 10.37.248.56@o2ib1 162s ago has timed out (162s prior to deadline).
req@ffff8803f37b0000 x1388334453463212/t0 o502->MGS@MGC10.37.248.56@o2ib1_0:26/25 lens 240/8632 e 0 to 1 dl 1325258126 ref 1 fl Rpc:/0/0 rc 0/0
LustreError: 166-1: MGC10.37.248.56@o2ib1: Connection to service MGS via nid 10.37.248.56@o2ib1 was lost; in progress operations using this service will fail.
LustreError: 15c-8: MGC10.37.248.56@o2ib1: The configuration from log 'lustre-client' failed (-4). This may be the result of communication errors between this node and the MGS, a bad configuration, or other errors. See the syslog for more information.
LustreError: 17599:0:(llite_lib.c:1078:ll_fill_super()) Unable to process log: -4
LustreError: 17599:0:(lov_obd.c:993:lov_cleanup()) lov tgt 0 not cleaned! deathrow=0, lovrc=1
LustreError: 17599:0:(lov_obd.c:993:lov_cleanup()) lov tgt 1 not cleaned! deathrow=1, lovrc=1
LustreError: 17599:0:(mdc_request.c:1491:mdc_precleanup()) client import never connected

The 1.8.6 non cray clients did work. Is 1.8.4 to old to work?

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 30/Dec/11 ]

Yu Jian, I recall that one of the workarounds that Oleg implemented for older clients was to avoid sending the large LOV EA and cookies to the client, and then have the MDS do the unlink itself.

I wonder if this functionality was lost in the port to master?

Comment by Peter Jones [ 30/Dec/11 ]

James

A vanilla 1.8.4 is certainly too old to interoperate with master. You would need at least 1.8.6-wc1 and preferably 1.8.7-wc1. Cray may attempt to heavily patch their 1.8.4 release in order to avoid rebasing but I think that it would be sensible to separate that exercise from the testing needed in order to get this code landed to master.

Peter

Comment by James A Simmons [ 30/Dec/11 ]

Oleg's work around never worked on 1.8 clients. So far the Oracle 1.8.6 client works. I'm going to do more testing to make sure. Speaking of once my client side patch is okayed I support port it to the 1.8.X-wc branch. Right now the lustre utiles barf on large stripe directories. We will need that support for 2.1 clients.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 30/Dec/11 ]

For my testing on a 2.1 client I create directory with 1036 stripes and then from 1.8.6 clients ran IOR to create single shared file. IOR was successful at creating this file of 1036 stripe on a Oracle 1.8.6 client. This is with the latest wide stripe patches including the dynamic buffer patch. I agree with you peter that the 1.8.4 problem should not inhibit the wide stripe merger.

Comment by Peter Jones [ 31/Dec/11 ]

James

Sorry if I was not clear enough. I really meant that you needed to use at least 1.8.6-wc1. The Oracle 1.8.6 release is a subset of this release and the Oracle release does not necessarily contain everything needed for compatibility with Lustre 2.x releases

Peter

Comment by Jian Yu [ 31/Dec/11 ]

Yu Jian, I recall that one of the workarounds that Oleg implemented for older clients was to avoid sending the large LOV EA and cookies to the client, and then have the MDS do the unlink itself.

I wonder if this functionality was lost in the port to master?

I did some experiments and found:
On b1_8 branch, mds_reint_unlink() still sends lov EA and llog cookies to the client. And on master branch, mdd_object_kill() does this work. On both b1_8 and master clients, ll_objects_destroy() uses the lov EA data to call lov_destroy() to unlink the objects on OSTs.

The iozone test passed on both b1_8 and master branch. It also passed on master branch with the combined wide-striping patches applied (without the dynamic buffer patch):
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/3aafe996-3357-11e1-97a8-5254004bbbd3

It turns out that the issue is a regression caused by the dynamic buffer patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/1808.

We need figure out why the OBD_MD_FLEASIZE flag was not set along with the lov EA data.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 04/Jan/12 ]

Since the new feature deadline is approaching large stripe count might not make it in. I like to ask my client side work to make it at least for 2.2 so that if wide stripe does end up in 2.3 the 2.2 clients will support large stripe count.

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 04/Jan/12 ]

Issue LUDOC-29 was filed to track the required documentation updates for 2000 stripes.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 04/Jan/12 ]

I've successfully formatted and mounted 2000 OSTs on master branch with the latest version of the combined patches (http://review.whamcloud.com/1842 patch set 8) but without the dynamic buffer patch, parallel-scale ior test passed with stripe count of -1:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2df594f2-37cc-11e1-bd0c-5254004bbbd3

Comment by James A Simmons [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Will dynamic buffer be merged if it is fixed up after Jan 7.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Current status of the patches:

component gerrit link status
ldiskfs http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 passed reviews, auto and manual testing, ready for landing
lov http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 passed reviews, auto and manual testing, ready for landing
tests http://review.whamcloud.com/1880 passed reviews, auto and manual testing, ready for landing
utils http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 passed auto and manual testing, pending reviews
mds http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 manual testing failed
e2fsprogs http://review.whamcloud.com/1886 minor fixups needed
Comment by Jian Yu [ 05/Jan/12 ]

> Will dynamic buffer be merged if it is fixed up after Jan 7.

I hope so.

Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,ofa #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = FAILURE
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,ofa #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,sles11,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,ubuntu1004,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,ofa #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,inkernel #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,ofa #408
LU-80 ldiskfs: large EA support (Revision 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 99c3dc10e445cfe299da07eec57eae04b9aa4347
Files :

  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-sles11.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel5-ext4.series
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/patches/ext4-large-eas.patch
  • ldiskfs/kernel_patches/series/ldiskfs-2.6-rhel6.series
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,ofa #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = FAILURE
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,ofa #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,sles11,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,ubuntu1004,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,ofa #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,inkernel #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 05/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,ofa #409
LU-80 lov: large stripe count support (Revision 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e)
LU-80 tests: large xattr support (Revision 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 01138321c7ce393c189a7ed11559c0938ce9f17e
Files :

  • lustre/include/dt_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
  • lustre/osd-ldiskfs/osd_handler.c
  • lustre/include/obd_lov.h
  • lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
  • lustre/mds/mds_log.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_request.c
  • lustre/mds/mds_lov.c
  • lustre/lov/lov_internal.h
  • lustre/include/obd.h
  • lustre/lov/lov_qos.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_net.h

Oleg Drokin : 8a1606a7cbbcaf418fefa5d97a2335df0c0edb09
Files :

  • lustre/tests/conf-sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/lustre-rsync-test.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/replay-single.sh
Comment by Mikhail Pershin [ 06/Jan/12 ]

Yu Jian, am I right that bug with non-removed inodes are related to dynamic buffer patch? Is it reproducable with small amount of OSSs or only with big number?

Comment by Jian Yu [ 06/Jan/12 ]

Yu Jian, am I right that bug with non-removed inodes are related to dynamic buffer patch?

Yes, Tappro. Without the patch, the iozone test passed with objects destroyed.

Is it reproducable with small amount of OSSs or only with big number?

I could not reproduce the issue with 6, 20, 30 OSTs separately, but hit the issue on 40 and 200 OSTs (did not try other number).

Comment by Jian Yu [ 10/Jan/12 ]

The object unlink issue is being worked in LU-971.

I verified the patch for LU-971 with the dynamic buffer and utils patches on 40 OSTs. The iozone test passed with objects unlinked.

I'm testing 2000 OSTs against master branch with the following patches applied:

The iozone and ior tests also passed against 2000 OSTs (stripe count was -1) on master branch with the above patches applied:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/3fd164ea-3d84-11e1-9a65-5254004bbbd3
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/e73a629a-3da2-11e1-87f0-5254004bbbd3

Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,ofa #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,ofa #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,sles11,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,ubuntu1004,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,ofa #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,inkernel #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,ofa #434
LU-80 utils: Large stripe support (Revision 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4072f026a706fcabb9b8cbaec4dcd534e9de7c95
Files :

  • lustre/utils/lfs.c
  • lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h
  • lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c
  • lustre/utils/obd.c
  • lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Jan/12 ]

Current status of the patches:

component gerrit link status
ldiskfs http://review.whamcloud.com/1708 merged
lov http://review.whamcloud.com/1111 merged
tests http://review.whamcloud.com/1880 merged
utils http://review.whamcloud.com/1194 merged
e2fsprogs http://review.whamcloud.com/1886 merged
mds http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 pending reviews
mdt http://review.whamcloud.com/1930 minor fixup needed
manual http://review.whamcloud.com/1929 some improvements needed
Comment by James A Simmons [ 23/Jan/12 ]

The mds patch (1808) needs rebasing against master

Comment by Jian Yu [ 08/Feb/12 ]

The mds patch (1808) needs rebasing against master

Done. The patch set is pending reviews.

Comment by James A Simmons [ 09/Feb/12 ]

Got it. Should the util patch be ported to b2_1 so 2.1 clients can use large stripe support with 2.2+ servers?

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 10/Feb/12 ]

We are trying to stick to the policy that new features are not being landed on maintenance branches.

That said, since this is only affecting the user tools in a very isolated way, it could be considered for the 2.1.2 release, since 2.1.1 is already undergoing release testing.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 21/Feb/12 ]

Current status of the patches:

Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,sles11,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,ofa #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 06/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,inkernel #477
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Nathan Rutman [ 18/Apr/12 ]

Is this resolved? Included in 2.2, correct?

Comment by James A Simmons [ 18/Apr/12 ]

One patch left http://review.whamcloud.com/1808 which didn't make it into 2.2. I hope it will merged into 2.3 development branch. Also you have to do a special format stripe to enable large EA for mkfs.lustre. Its not enabled by default.

Comment by Jian Yu [ 18/Apr/12 ]

Hello Nathan,

Is this resolved? Included in 2.2, correct?

Yes, the large xattr (aka wide striping) feature is included in Lustre 2.2 which supports the maximum stripe count for a single file up to 2000 OSTs. However, this feature is disabled by default at mkfs.lustre time. In order to enable this feature, the "-O large_xattr" option needs to be set on MDT either with --mkfsoptions at format time or via tune2fs.

There are still some improvements on this feature:
1) The patch in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1808 which supports dynamic reply buffer is pending reviews now.
2) LU-908, which is going to support referencing "mid-sized" xattrs (up to 64kB) directly from the xattr block pointer so as to improve the performance of operating on large xattrs.

Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,sles11,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el5,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el5,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el6,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el5,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,client,el5,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 29/Apr/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-master » i686,server,el6,ofa #496
LU-80 mds: use md_size supplied by client, repack reply (Revision 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : 4fd92d576124fd7772c9f718b83eb67f500e5cec
Files :

  • lustre/mdt/mdt_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_dir.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_object.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_reint.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_handler.c
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_internal.h
  • lustre/mdd/mdd_lov.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_req_layout.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_xattr.c
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_lib.c
  • lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c
  • lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
  • lustre/include/md_object.h
  • lustre/mdt/mdt_open.c
Comment by Jian Yu [ 02/May/12 ]

All of the patches have been merged. Let's close this ticket.

Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » x86_64,client,el5,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/liblustre/super.c

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » i686,client,el6,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/liblustre/super.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » i686,server,el5,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/liblustre/super.c
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » x86_64,server,el6,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/liblustre/super.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » i686,client,el5,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/liblustre/super.c

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » x86_64,server,el5,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/liblustre/super.c

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
Comment by Build Master (Inactive) [ 02/May/12 ]

Integrated in lustre-dev » x86_64,client,el6,inkernel #340
LU-808 llite: deny truncate beyond user rlimit (Revision a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163)
LU-80 utils: add "-c <stripe_count>" option to lfs_migrate (Revision d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c)

Result = SUCCESS
Oleg Drokin : a44174684d800d74d35d9eb0b1b65bcfd0dd8163
Files :

  • lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
  • lustre/liblustre/llite_lib.h
  • lustre/obdclass/obd_mount.c
  • lustre/liblustre/super.c
  • lustre/include/lustre_lite.h

Oleg Drokin : d40ad918bd688d9b5b3307ded042dd6d03cc414c
Files :

  • lustre/tests/test-framework.sh
  • lustre/tests/sanity.sh
  • lustre/doc/lfs_migrate.1
  • lustre/scripts/lfs_migrate
Comment by Alexey Lyashkov [ 15/Nov/12 ]

e2image tool from a e2fsprogs broked after that change, so -r / -Q options don't copy a inode contents to the image.
I will send a fix son.

Comment by Peter Jones [ 19/Nov/12 ]

Shadow could you please open a new ticket for any issues relating to this work? We can create links back to the original ticket but it makes it easier to track - thanks!

Comment by Alexey Lyashkov [ 19/Nov/12 ]

Peter,

I already create one and submit a patch, but jenkins looks broken to test e2fsprogs patch.

Comment by Peter Jones [ 19/Nov/12 ]

Ah yes - LU-2348 - thanks!

Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 12/Aug/16 ]

http://review.whamcloud.com/2331

LU-80 tests: support regression testing on wide striping

This patch enables large_xattr feature at mkfs.lustre time to
support regression testing on wide striping. It is intended to
be built by Jenkins and performed by autotest system.

Signed-off-by: Yu Jian <yujian@whamcloud.com>
Change-Id: Iea7042891bab6fdcb19fb9dae7e6d54c02a99267
Generated at Sat Feb 10 01:03:33 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.