[LU-8004] replay-single test_70b: ASSERTION( ((o)->lo_header->loh_attr & LOHA_EXISTS) != 0 ) failed Created: 11/Apr/16  Updated: 26/Apr/16  Resolved: 26/Apr/16

Status: Closed
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: WC Triage
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Related
is related to LU-7617 replay-single test_70b hangs ASSERTIO... Resolved
Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bffbd062-fdd6-11e5-8750-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_70b failed with the following error:

test failed to respond and timed out

Please provide additional information about the failure here.

Info required for matching: replay-single 70b



 Comments   
Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 11/Apr/16 ]

this may be related to LU-7298. It happens in the same test, but reports a different ASSERTION() fail.

15:29:36:LustreError: 24807:0:(lu_object.h:862:lu_object_attr()) ASSERTION( ((o)->lo_header->loh_attr & LOHA_EXISTS) != 0 ) failed: 
15:29:36:LustreError: 24807:0:(lu_object.h:862:lu_object_attr()) LBUG
15:29:36:Pid: 24807, comm: mdt00_001
15:29:36:
15:29:36:Call Trace:
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0464875>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0464e77>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0dcc8af>] mdd_rename+0x16ef/0x1d70 [mdd]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0dbbf1c>] ? __mdd_lookup+0x28c/0x450 [mdd]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c9e0cd>] mdt_reint_rename_or_migrate+0x178d/0x2670 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa07ea7ed>] ? null_alloc_rs+0xcd/0x320 [ptlrpc]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa05aa30c>] ? upcall_cache_get_entry+0x29c/0x880 [obdclass]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c945bf>] ? ucred_set_jobid+0x5f/0x70 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c9efe3>] mdt_reint_rename+0x13/0x20 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c9823d>] mdt_reint_rec+0x5d/0x200 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c83e4b>] mdt_reint_internal+0x62b/0x9f0 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa0c846ab>] mdt_reint+0x6b/0x120 [mdt]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa08137fc>] tgt_request_handle+0x8ec/0x1440 [ptlrpc]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa07c0871>] ptlrpc_main+0xd21/0x1800 [ptlrpc]
15:29:36: [<ffffffffa07bfb50>] ? ptlrpc_main+0x0/0x1800 [ptlrpc]
15:29:36: [<ffffffff810a138e>] kthread+0x9e/0xc0
15:29:36: [<ffffffff8100c28a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
15:29:36: [<ffffffff810a12f0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0
15:29:36: [<ffffffff8100c280>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 26/Apr/16 ]

another on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/112819da-0bb7-11e6-9b34-5254006e85c2

Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 26/Apr/16 ]

Closing this ticket as a duplicate of LU-7617

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:13:47 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.