[LU-8129] sanity test_102n: before and after xattrs of '/mnt/lustre/f102n.sanity.1' differ Created: 11/May/16 Updated: 18/Mar/19 Resolved: 18/Nov/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.9.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Critical |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Emoly Liu |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for John Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/20ada272-179b-11e6-9e5d-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_102n failed with the following error: before and after xattrs of '/mnt/lustre/f102n.sanity.1' differ Please provide additional information about the failure here. Info required for matching: sanity 102n The tag 2.8.53 has disabled some conditional code that causes this test to fail. The fix is in http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20112/. |
| Comments |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 16/May/16 ] |
|
The issue has been fixed via |
| Comment by Sarah Liu [ 13/Jun/16 ] |
|
interop between 2.8 client and 2.9 server still has this issue |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 06/Sep/16 ] |
|
another for 2.8 and master interop: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8e14e5e2-7249-11e6-b08e-5254006e85c2 |
| Comment by Saurabh Tandan (Inactive) [ 09/Nov/16 ] |
|
Still see this issue for 2.8 and master interop please refer to previous messages for latest failures. |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 09/Nov/16 ] |
|
Emoly Could you please assist with this issue? Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 10/Nov/16 ] |
|
Emoly Liu (emoly.liu@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/23687 |
| Comment by Emoly Liu [ 10/Nov/16 ] |
|
I discussed this issue to fanyong, and he said we don't support lfsck interop test anymore, so I add a check to test_102n to compare if the client and server have the same version. BTW, pjones, do you think which branches need this backported patch as well, in case of the interop failure? I can help. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 18/Nov/16 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/23687/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 18/Nov/16 ] |
|
Landed for 2.9 |