[LU-8248] sanity test_248: fast read was not 4 times faster Created: 07/Jun/16 Updated: 11/Aug/16 Resolved: 11/Aug/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.9.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | James Nunez (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue was created by maloo for Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/28287b5e-2b40-11e6-acf3-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_248 failed with the following error: Test 1: verify that fast read is 4 times faster on cache read sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.33 vs 1.15): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.29 vs 1.08): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.32 vs 1.08): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.26 vs 1.02): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.59 vs 0.98): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.28 vs 0.89): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.37 vs 1.30): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.39 vs 0.97): sanity test_248: @@@@@@ IGNORE (fast read was not 4 times faster: 0.41 vs 1.45): There are also cases where the fast read was "too fast". There is also an error message that needs to be fixed. error() without useful message, please fix Info required for matching: sanity 248 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 07/Jun/16 ] |
|
James, you mentioned that you were going to work on a fix for this failure? It looks like the error_ignore is missing an LU ticket number as the first argument, which may as well be this ticket |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 08/Jun/16 ] |
|
Patch is at http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20647/ If the patch needs to be refreshed, I will change the LU number in the commit message to reflect this ticket. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 08/Jun/16 ] |
|
Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/20698 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 11/Aug/16 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/20698/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 11/Aug/16 ] |
|
Landed for 2.9 |