[LU-8294] Noisy gss_svc_upcall_handle_init Created: 16/Jun/16 Updated: 15/Jan/20 Resolved: 12/May/17 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.10.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Oleg Drokin | Assignee: | Kit Westneat |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
I noticed that ever since I enabled gss builds, I am getting some spam in my dmesg like this: [ 979.361247] Lustre: 12252:0:(gss_svc_upcall.c:998:gss_svc_upcall_handle_init()) cache_check return ENOENT, drop
[ 979.362449] Lustre: 12252:0:(gss_svc_upcall.c:998:gss_svc_upcall_handle_init()) Skipped 9 previous similar messages
Sine I don't really have anything security-related configured during these runs, I imagine these warnings need to be silenced to only happen when they are really needed. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 02/May/17 ] |
|
Kit Is this something that you will have bandwidth to work on over the coming weeks? I am trying to assess whether we will be able to include this fix in 2.10 Thanks Peter |
| Comment by Kit Westneat [ 05/May/17 ] |
|
Hi Peter, I don't know enough about GSS to speak with much authority on it. Although that also gives me some ability to say that I think a sys admin new to GSS and Lustre would not have much use for that error message, so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix? Thanks, |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 05/May/17 ] |
|
> so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix? Yes. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 06/May/17 ] |
|
Kit Westneat (kit.westneat@gmail.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26976 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 12/May/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/26976/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 12/May/17 ] |
|
Landed for 2.10 |