[LU-8526] replay-single test_90: @@@@@@ FAIL: wrong stripe: all, uuid: lustre-OST0000_UUID

• Status: Resolved
• Project: Lustre
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.9.0
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.10.0
• Type: Bug
• Priority: Major
• Reporter: Maloo
• Assignee: WC Triage
• Resolution: Fixed
• Severity: 3

Description

This issue was created by maloo for nasf <[e-mail]>

Please provide additional information about the failure here.

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/03cc3718-68ea-11e6-b2e2-5254006e85c2.

Issue Links

• is related to: LU-4039 Failure on test suite replay-single t...
• is related to: LU-8544 recovery-double-scale test_pairwise_f...

Comments

[nasf (Inactive)]

Looks similar as LU-4039.

[Nathaniel Clark]

lustre-reviews, review-zfs-part-2
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1011bee2-698c-11e6-909b-5254006e85c2

[Jian Yu]

+1 on master branch:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/97b87550-69b6-11e6-9258-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ac32a648-6981-11e6-baeb-5254006e85c2

[nasf (Inactive)]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1e365b2a-79e2-11e6-8a8c-5254006e85c2

[Niu Yawei (Inactive)]

Another failure: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/98e04392-8412-11e6-a81d-5254006e85c2

[James Nunez (Inactive)]

I've increased the priority of this ticket because master branch is experiencing the error several times a day recently.

[Andreas Dilger]

It may be that patch http://review.whamcloud.com/22459 "LU-8544 test: using lfs df in client_up" will fix this problem. As stated in LU-4039, I think this was introduced by patch http://review.whamcloud.com/19195 "LU-7759 llite: handle inactive OSTs better in statfs" and the changes in LU-4039 did not fix the problem, and re-enabling the test on 2016-08-10 clearly caused test_90 to start failing again.

[Andreas Dilger]

Close as a duplicate of LU-8544, which has now landed.

[Bruno Faccini (Inactive)]

Andreas, don't you think that we shouldn't also strengthen replay-single/test_90 itself by adding a check like "clients_up" or "wait_osts_up" (presently only available in conf-sanity) instead of current "wait_osc_import_state mds ost FULL" (original change introduced for LU-4039) ??

[Andreas Dilger]

Bruno, I'm not against improving the tests if you think that will avoid failures. That said, please balance time spent against the chance of this actually causing problems in the future.

[Gerrit Updater]

Faccini Bruno ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/23148
Subject: LU-8526 tests: ensure all OSTs active for allocations
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 2ab63209f8a72ef2f8c61a27671d6ce96c2c18fd

[Bruno Faccini (Inactive)]

http://review.whamcloud.com/23148 implements what I think is the specific fix to ensure replay-single/test_90 will run successful and particularly to allow for random selection of OSTs during setstripe to be effective, which was the main cause of failures being tracked by this ticket and also by LU-4039.

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/23148/
Subject: LU-8526 tests: ensure all OSTs active for allocations
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: 04794b33653fedca282d6f8dfd9c1c9e833ead06