[LU-8593] sanity-lfsck test_19b: (3) Expected 1 repaired, but got 0 Created: 08/Sep/16  Updated: 06/Jul/21  Resolved: 06/Jul/21

Status: Resolved
Project: Lustre
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.9.0, Lustre 2.10.0, Lustre 2.11.0
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Maloo Assignee: WC Triage
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

EL7.2 Server/SLES12 SP1 Client
master, build# 3431


Severity: 3
Rank (Obsolete): 9223372036854775807

 Description   

This issue was created by maloo for Saurabh Tandan <saurabh.tandan@intel.com>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/970188da-723b-11e6-8a8c-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_19b failed with the following error:

(3) Expected 1 repaired, but got 0

test config:

== sanity-lfsck test 19b: OST-object inconsistency self repair ======================================= 22:01:02 (1472878862)
Inject failure stub to make the OST-object to back point to
non-exist MDT-object
CMD: onyx-43vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl set_param fail_loc=0x1611
fail_loc=0x1611
error: set_param: setting /proc/fs/lustre/ldlm/namespaces/lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff88007a7f1800/lru_size=clear: Invalid argument
ldlm.namespaces.lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff88007a7f1800.lock_unused_count=1
CMD: onyx-43vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl set_param fail_loc=0
fail_loc=0
Nothing should be fixed since self detect and repair is disabled
CMD: onyx-43vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n obdfilter.lustre-OST0000.lfsck_verify_pfid
Read RPC with right parent FID should be accepted,
and cause parent FID on OST to be fixed
CMD: onyx-43vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl set_param -n obdfilter.lustre-OST0000.lfsck_verify_pfid 1
foo
CMD: onyx-43vm8 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n obdfilter.lustre-OST0000.lfsck_verify_pfid
 sanity-lfsck test_19b: @@@@@@ FAIL: (3) Expected 1 repaired, but got 0

Might be related to LU-5030



 Comments   
Comment by James Casper [ 24/May/17 ]

2.9.57, b3575:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/faf1c2ae-787c-4316-9754-39ec578b6c34

Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 12/Sep/17 ]

another on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8b405ec4-97b3-11e7-b944-5254006e85c2

Comment by Jian Yu [ 16/Oct/17 ]

+1 on master:
https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1d336210-addd-11e7-bb19-5254006e85c2

Generated at Sat Feb 10 02:18:54 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c.