[LU-8972] conf-sanity test_101: File hasn't object on OST Created: 24/Dec/16 Updated: 11/Jun/18 Resolved: 11/Jun/18 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.9.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | Lustre 2.12.0 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Maloo | Assignee: | Alex Zhuravlev |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/57cc8712-c9db-11e6-af18-5254006e85c2. The sub-test test_101 failed with the following error: File hasn't object on OST Info required for matching: conf-sanity 101
This is quite new issue which starts to happen since yesterday, it can be related to some recent commits. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Mikhail Pershin [ 24/Dec/16 ] |
|
I see that this issue happens quite often right now in Maloo. Failure rate is about 50% right now |
| Comment by Mikhail Pershin [ 24/Dec/16 ] |
|
failed test 101 was introduced in |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 25/Dec/16 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/24517 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 27/Dec/16 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/ |
| Comment by Bob Glossman (Inactive) [ 27/Dec/16 ] |
|
another on master: |
| Comment by Ned Bass [ 28/Dec/16 ] |
|
I'm disappointed that https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/ was fast-tracked through the landing process with no explanation or discussion. The lack of transparency is a bit alarming given that the failing test is designed to catch filesystem data loss. To make matters worse, the test results are hidden behind a login screen so there is no public way to discern why you might have decided to disable the test. |
| Comment by Joseph Gmitter (Inactive) [ 28/Dec/16 ] |
|
Assigning to James to reproduce in manual mode and validate where the test is going wrong to identify next steps. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 25/Jan/17 ] |
|
Alex Zhuravlev (alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/25079 |
| Comment by Joseph Gmitter (Inactive) [ 25/Jan/17 ] |
|
Reassigning to Alex since he has a patch in flight for the issue. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 31/Jan/17 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/25079/ |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 31/Jan/17 ] |
|
Landed for 2.10 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/Mar/17 ] |
|
Hongchao Zhang (hongchao.zhang@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/25687 |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 09/Mar/17 ] |
|
It would be nice to have a better description of the problem here and why it's not so easy to fix. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 10/Mar/17 ] |
|
Alex Zhuravlev (alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/25924 |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 29/May/17 ] |
|
The conf-sanity test_101 is still in ALWAYS_EXCEPT, so this needs to be fixed before closing this ticket. |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 01/May/18 ] |
|
James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/32220 |
| Comment by Gerrit Updater [ 07/Jun/18 ] |
|
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/32220/ |
| Comment by James Nunez (Inactive) [ 11/Jun/18 ] |
|
Patch to remove conf-sanity from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list landed to master. Resolving issue. |