[LU-982] lustre2.x group_upcall Created: 11/Jan/12 Updated: 30/Jan/12 Resolved: 30/Jan/12 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Lustre 2.1.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Mahmoud Hanafi | Assignee: | Cliff White (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Environment: |
Centsos6 kernel 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6 |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Severity: | 3 | ||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 6490 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
the lustre2.1 doc say "The default group upcall is set by mkfs.lustre. Use tunefs.lustre --param or echo {path}>/proc/fs/lustre/mds/ {mdsname}/group_upcall" doesn't exist. service150 /proc/fs/lustre/mds # ls -l /proc/fs/lustre/mds Also the line above this says "The default upcall is /usr/sbin/l_getidentity, which can interact with the user/group database to obtain UID/GID/suppgid. The user/group database depends on authentication configuration, and can be local /etc/passwd, NIS, LDAP, etc. If necessary, the administrator can use a parse utility to set /proc/fs/lustre/mdt/${FSNAME}-MDT {xxxx}/identity_upcall. If the upcall interface is set to NONE, then upcall is disabled. The MDS uses the UID/GID/suppgid supplied by the client." How do you setup group upcall? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 11/Jan/12 ] |
|
Cliff Can you please help with this one? Peter |
| Comment by Cliff White (Inactive) [ 11/Jan/12 ] |
|
The Lustre 2.1 docs are incorrect, and will be fixed. In Lustre 2.x group_upcall has been replaced by identity_upcall (/proc/fs/lustre/mdt/${FSNAME}-MDT {xxxx}/identity_upcall) You can set this with 'echo' |
| Comment by nasf (Inactive) [ 11/Jan/12 ] |
|
Ticket for Lustre manual updating is: |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 26/Jan/12 ] |
|
Mahmoud Have you now got the information that you need to use this functionality? If not, what further assistance do you need from us? Please advise Peter |
| Comment by Mahmoud Hanafi [ 30/Jan/12 ] |
|
I think we have all we need for now.You may close this case Thanks, |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 30/Jan/12 ] |
|
ok thanks Mahmoud! |