[LU-9936] ldiskfs_write_ldd() calls fsync(filep->_fileno) but doesn't fflush() flip first Created: 01/Sep/17 Updated: 29/Jan/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | John Hammond | Assignee: | WC Triage |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | easy, mount | ||
| Severity: | 3 |
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
In ldiskfs_write_ldd(): 270 num = fwrite(&mop->mo_ldd, sizeof(mop->mo_ldd), 1, filep); 271 if (num < 1 && ferror(filep)) { 272 fprintf(stderr, "%s: Unable to write to file (%s): %s\n", 273 progname, filepnm, strerror(errno)); 274 fclose(filep); 275 goto out_umnt; 276 } 277 fsync(filep->_fileno); 278 fclose(filep); Calling fsync() without first calling fflush() is ineffective since there will likely still be unwritten data in the userspace buffer. Also we should use fileno(filp) instead of accessing filp->_fileno. We should check the returns of fflush(), fsync(), and fclose() for failure. Since an error is more likely to be reported there than from fwrite(). |
| Comments |
| Comment by John Hammond [ 05/Sep/17 ] |
|
Andreas has pointed out that there is no reason to use stdio here. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 05/Sep/17 ] |
|
There doesn't appear to be a good reason for using buffered stream IO here. Instead, this should use Unix IO (open(), write(), fsync(), and close()). |