[LUDOC-221] Document Token Bucket Filter (TBF) NRS policy Created: 04/Feb/14 Updated: 25/Jul/16 Resolved: 04/Dec/15 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Lustre Documentation |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | Blocker |
| Reporter: | Andreas Dilger | Assignee: | Jodi Levi (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | releases | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 12513 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Document the TBF NRS policy for the feature added in |
| Comments |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 03/Mar/14 ] |
|
The attachment is the document for TBF. I'd really appriciate it if some one can give me a brief introduction about how to add a manual patch. What I need to do? Thanks! |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 03/Mar/14 ] |
|
Please see https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Making+changes+to+the+Lustre+Manual Hopefully that will get you started. If the page is lacking in detail, please ask further questions and/or update the page, since it is difficult for us to know what information is lacking. |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 03/Mar/14 ] |
|
Hi Andreas, Thank you very much! I will start working on it. |
| Comment by Andreas Dilger [ 09/Sep/14 ] |
|
Li Xi, is there any progress on adding this documentation to the manual? Is there someone else at DDN/Clogeny that could help you with this effort? |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 10/Sep/14 ] |
|
Hi Andreas, we've push a manual patch a month ago. Sorry, we didn't post a comment here. Please let us know if there is anything else we need to do. |
| Comment by Malcolm Cowe (Inactive) [ 01/Dec/14 ] |
|
Can the jobid be wildcarded? e.g. *:<uid>. |
| Comment by Li Xi (Inactive) [ 01/Dec/14 ] |
|
Nope, a rule is matched by comparing the exact string of jobid. But it is allowed to set multiple jobid for each rule. And it is not hard to add extension if wildcards are necessary. nrs_tbf_jobid_list_match() is the function that we need to change. |
| Comment by Malcolm Cowe (Inactive) [ 01/Dec/14 ] |
|
Thanks. I thought that might be the answer |