Brett
The idea is that no new features will be introduced in LTS releases (like 2.10.x), only the major releases (2.x.0)
Peter
Hey Peter. Thanks for your response. I wasn't aware of that expectation. But now I am... 
-Brett
[LUDOC-427] Use full release version in the "Introduced in Lustre 2.x.x" sections. Created: 26/Dec/18 Updated: 26/May/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Lustre Documentation |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor |
| Reporter: | Oz Rentas | Assignee: | Lustre Manual Triage |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Rank (Obsolete): | 9223372036854775807 |
| Description |
|
In the Lustre manual, the headings that read "Introduced in Lustre 2.x" provide a very effective method to track multiple releases in one document. The earliest of these headings appears to be a single 2.3, followed by multiple 2.4's, and onward. With the five (5) 2.10.x releases, the use of 2.10 without the .0-.4 appended appears to be used. With the release of 2.11.0 now available, and if multiple 2.11.x releases become available, this very effective method to track multiple releases in one document could diminish when not using the full version. Thus, this suggestion is to use the full release number going forward, and also to update any existing 2.10 release indicators to the full release version 2.10.0, 2.10.1, etc, if warranted. Lastly, it appears that there may be a typo ("Intro to 2.12") just ahead of section 16.4. Thanks for considering. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Jones [ 02/Jan/19 ] |
|
Brett The idea is that no new features will be introduced in LTS releases (like 2.10.x), only the major releases (2.x.0) Peter |
| Comment by Brett Lee (Inactive) [ 02/Jan/19 ] |
|
Hey Peter. Thanks for your response. I wasn't aware of that expectation. But now I am... |