<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:32:31 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-10153] route via two different networks not supported</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10153</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;We were trying to setup routers between EDR storage fabrics and an FDR client fabric.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea was to have two independent, redundant EDR storage fabrics - o2ib8 and o2ib9 - with routers and servers having interfaces on both fabrics.  The routers would have two ports on the single FDR fabric - o2ib3 - with clients having a single port on the FDR fabric.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To do this in a way that uses the route checker to balance between client and router ports we were going to setup:&lt;br/&gt;
  Clients with two routes from the FDR network (o2ib3) to each EDR network (o2ib8 &amp;amp; o2ib9), one via each of the router&apos;s interfaces on the FDR network.&lt;br/&gt;
  Servers with with two routes, one from each EDR fabric to the FDR network via the two EDR ports on the router.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But ran into a problem configuring servers:&lt;br/&gt;
  60258.285963] LNetError: 70723:0:(router.c:489:lnet_check_routes()) Routes to o2ib3 via 10.112.5.108@o2ib9 and 10.112.1.88@o2ib8 not supported&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everyone I have asked doubts that this restriction was ever necessary, and it almost certainly does not make sense now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="48913">LU-10153</key>
            <summary>route via two different networks not supported</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="ashehata">Amir Shehata</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="schamp">Stephen Champion</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>lnet-router</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:33:25 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:37:24 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:37:24 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.10.1</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.13.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>15</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="211808" author="pjones" created="Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:32:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Amir is looking into this&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="229992" author="dougo" created="Thu, 5 Jul 2018 23:50:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Some customers make use of &quot;virtual&quot; lnets for various purposes. &#160;For example, Cray likes to have two gni-based LNets to separate DVS traffic from Lustre traffic. &#160;They are using the same GNI network interface, they are just different NIDs (i.e. gni6 and gni99).&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now that we have Dynamic Discovery turned on by default in 2.11, the clients are advertising both of these NIDs to the servers. &#160;If there is an LNet router in the middle (which there is with Cray: gni &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; o2ib), the servers need to have two sets of routing entries: one for gni6 and one for gni99. &#160;With this bug, we cannot set that up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only work around is to 1- not have the two lnets (not a good solution), or 2- turn off DD/MR. &#160;Number 2 is fine for now until there is a need to have multiple real interfaces in the servers. &#160;Then this becomes an urgent issue.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233924" author="ashehata" created="Mon, 24 Sep 2018 14:48:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is being fixed as part of a set of routing changes that aim at aligning the routing infrastructure with Multi-Rail.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="235300" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 23 Oct 2018 03:54:36 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Amir Shehata (ashehata@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/33447&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/33447&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10153&quot; title=&quot;route via two different networks not supported&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-10153&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-10153&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: remove route add restriction&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: multi-rail&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1de567d6eb9bed7ebab85cd7fccf1248a8b68e50&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="248702" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 7 Jun 2019 18:10:59 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Amir Shehata (ashehata@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/33447/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/33447/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10153&quot; title=&quot;route via two different networks not supported&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-10153&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-10153&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: remove route add restriction&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: multi-rail&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 79ea6af86f57741bdd0b6bb49b380d8be454bf91&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="251937" author="hornc" created="Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:53:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=pjones&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;pjones&quot;&gt;pjones&lt;/a&gt; I believe this ticket can be closed with the merge of Amir&apos;s MR routing feature.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="251949" author="pjones" created="Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:37:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tipoff Chris - it looks like you&apos;re correct.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10030" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:labels">
                        <customfieldname>Epic/Theme</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                        <label>lnet</label>
    
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzzmcv:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>