https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10279 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for nasf &lt;fan.yong@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>Please provide additional information about the failure here.</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f7128536-d152-11e7-a066-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f7128536-d152-11e7-a066-52540065bddc</a>.</p> <p>VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV<br/> sanityn test_101a - Found WRITE RPC but expect none</p> LU-10279

sanityn test_101c: FAIL: Found WRITE RPC but expect none

Bug Major Resolved Cannot Reproduce Jian Yu Maloo failing_tests rhel8.3 Sat, 25 Nov 2017 02:46:26 +0000 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:23:03 +0000 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:23:03 +0000 Lustre 2.11.0 Lustre 2.12.0 Lustre 2.13.0 Lustre 2.14.0 Lustre 2.12.6 0 14 <p>+1 on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/699aa7dc-fc37-11e7-a7cd-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/699aa7dc-fc37-11e7-a7cd-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>We see a similar failure for sanityn 101a usually in review-dne testing. See the following for logs:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f7d47412-da70-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f7d47412-da70-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e4060788-df26-11e7-a066-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e4060788-df26-11e7-a066-52540065bddc</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c614c1c2-f198-11e7-a169-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c614c1c2-f198-11e7-a169-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>+1 on master for sanityn 101a<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/86d74528-2188-11e8-a4b1-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/86d74528-2188-11e8-a4b1-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>another on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/62555b02-2bee-11e8-b6a0-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/62555b02-2bee-11e8-b6a0-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>A little manual testing suggests that setting dirty_writeback_centisecs does not reliably prevent writeback.  I can't quite get my head around it, but sometimes - even on an otherwise idle system! - I see immediate writeback when it is set to 0.</p> <p>Not sure what the solution is, but thought I'd drop that in there.</p> <p>And +1 on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d9374396-4cca-11e8-95c0-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d9374396-4cca-11e8-95c0-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>Patrick Farrell (pfarrell@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/34251" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/34251</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10279" title="sanityn test_101c: FAIL: Found WRITE RPC but expect none " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10279"><del>LU-10279</del></a> tests: Reduce chance of writeback in 101<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 87517534b46eb9873f83730756ac702ff12f65d7</p> <p>+1 on b2_12: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b2d911e6-4c67-11e9-9646-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b2d911e6-4c67-11e9-9646-52540065bddc</a></p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11752" class="external-link" rel="nofollow">https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11752</a><br/> Pretty sure this is a dupe of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11752" title="sanity test 271f fails with &#39;1 READ RPC occured&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-11752"><del>LU-11752</del></a>.</p> <p>We are still seeing sanityn test 101a fail with 'Found WRITE RPC but expect none' for master 2.12.53.1; <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d3fd6ad0-6dc2-11e9-a6f9-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d3fd6ad0-6dc2-11e9-a6f9-52540065bddc</a>. </p> <p>I'm not sure if <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11752" title="sanity test 271f fails with &#39;1 READ RPC occured&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-11752"><del>LU-11752</del></a> should be reopened instead of this one. This failure is for SLES ldiskfs, not ZFS. </p> <p>ON b2_12, the future 2.12.6, we see this error for RHEL 7.9 ldiskfs testing at <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7ca2f5bf-c8a0-463d-bb2f-a209513c376c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7ca2f5bf-c8a0-463d-bb2f-a209513c376c</a></p> <p>This is is failing 10% of all test runs, 67 times in the past 4 weeks.</p> <p>This is still failing about 10% of all runs, starting on 2021-03-01.</p> <p>Between 2021-01-01 and 2021-02-28, it only failed 4 times, once per week in January for <tt>full-patchless</tt> test sessions, and not in February at all. From 2021-03-01 to about 2021-05-29 it is failing about 8 times per week for patch review test runs, and since 2021-05-29 it is failing about 5 times per day.</p> <p>+1 on master <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/abfd9127-a2a6-49f7-9623-780c1aec6060" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/abfd9127-a2a6-49f7-9623-780c1aec6060</a></p> <p><a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/fcf489d2-3490-4b51-b782-977fc4439d89" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/fcf489d2-3490-4b51-b782-977fc4439d89</a></p> <p>+1 on master <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/542e9627-70e0-4474-8ac8-9dade022bf4b" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/542e9627-70e0-4474-8ac8-9dade022bf4b</a></p> <p>+1 on master <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7e12e91f-8b4e-4a04-bc04-1944f6b0bb3b" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7e12e91f-8b4e-4a04-bc04-1944f6b0bb3b</a></p> <p>+1 on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/4a7edfbc-19e4-46c7-b1d8-f8e55f6f9b4d" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/4a7edfbc-19e4-46c7-b1d8-f8e55f6f9b4d</a></p> <p>sanityn test 101c passed consistently in the last 6 months.</p> Duplicate LU-12286 LU-14394 Related LU-10413 LU-14828 LU-11280 Development Rank 1|hzzo8v: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity