<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:33:49 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-10300] Can the Lustre 2.10.x clients support 64K kernel page? </title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10300</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;We test Lustre in the kernel 4.11.0 which use 64K memory page, and we found that there are no config items in the configure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>Redhat</environment>
        <key id="49488">LU-10300</key>
            <summary>Can the Lustre 2.10.x clients support 64K kernel page? </summary>
                <type id="9" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/issuetypes/undefined.png">Question/Request</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="5">Cannot Reproduce</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="simmonsja">James A Simmons</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="Red">ZhangWei</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:51:06 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:27:13 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:27:13 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.10.0</version>
                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>11</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="214991" author="simmonsja" created="Thu, 30 Nov 2017 03:22:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Actually I have tested such a setup on Power8 which is 64K page based. The only issue that came up was when dealing with the ko2iblnd witth map_on_demand enabled. Otherwise it works.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="214997" author="red" created="Thu, 30 Nov 2017 04:25:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your replay, with the map_ondemand enabled, can the Lustre only support 4k kernel memory page?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="214999" author="adilger" created="Thu, 30 Nov 2017 05:57:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We definitely used to run Lustre with 64KB PAGE_SIZE on IA64 clients, and in theory this would still work but we haven&apos;t tested it in a long time.&#160; We never had much success with 64KB PAGE_SIZE on the server, since this caused problems with 4KB PAGE_SIZE clients doing writes to the 64KB PAGE_SIZE server.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="215003" author="red" created="Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:33:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yes, I tested the 64KB PAGE_SIZE server with 4KB PAGE_SIZE Client and 64KB PAGE_SIZE Client, there are some errors both in these two clients.Thanks for help !&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="216863" author="adilger" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:12:17 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It probably makes sense to print a build warning in the server code when PAGE_SIZE isn&apos;t 4096, just so people are aware that this isn&apos;t being tested. If someone starts testing this in the future, the warning can be removed. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="231397" author="simmonsja" created="Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:05:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Once the RHEL ARM/Power8 server support work is complete we can test 64K pages on the server side.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="232398" author="simmonsja" created="Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:14:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;So I have managed to get Lustre ZFS servers running on Power8 nodes. I got it to mount and then it just locked up with any attempt to use the file system &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/sad.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&#160;Well its a start&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233080" author="simmonsja" created="Thu, 6 Sep 2018 01:11:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This time I tested ZFS lustre servers using the ethernet interface and it worked. Currently their is a bug in the RHEL7 alt kernel that I&apos;m using in netlink that shows up when using k2oiblnd for some reason. Their appears to be a fix but requires rebuild the RHEL7 alt kernel. Now to test ldiskfs.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="237550" author="adilger" created="Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:41:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;James, I&apos;d suggest to move your previous comment into a separate ticket related to 64KB PAGE_SIZE on the server, and leave this one for tracking 64KB PAGE_SIZE on the client.  I suspect most people care about client-side support more than server-side, and this will help understand which issues are important to fix for the two different cases.  In any case, it doesn&apos;t make sense to have multiple independent issues being worked on in the same Jira ticket.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="321753" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:23:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;James Simmons &amp;lt;jsimmons@infradead.org&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/45962&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/45962&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10300&quot; title=&quot;Can the Lustre 2.10.x clients support 64K kernel page? &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-10300&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-10300&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; test: does arm testing work&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 2036c3298804defa44e0457e65893e91d1da3985&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="350912" author="adilger" created="Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:27:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The aarch64 clients are working with any recent Lustre release.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="65836">LU-14970</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="62420">LU-14346</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="48924">LU-10157</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="67585">LU-15364</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="34042">LU-7650</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="53881">LU-11597</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54308">LU-11785</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54311">LU-11788</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="29170">LU-6387</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="52887">LU-11200</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="67376">LU-15293</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54038">LU-11671</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="55544">LU-12255</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="22524">LU-4398</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="48588">LU-10073</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54189">LU-11729</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="53878">LU-11595</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="53880">LU-11596</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54986">LU-12014</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="69585">LU-15722</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54023">LU-11667</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="54310">LU-11787</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="55801">LU-12362</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="55913">LU-12419</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="67165">LU-15223</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzzogv:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>