<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:43:27 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-11389] lnet-setltest test smoke fails with &#8216;lst Error found&#8217;</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11389</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;lnet-selftest test_smoke fails with brw errors. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the test_log, we see that there are several brw errors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;c:
Total 0 error nodes in c
12345-10.9.4.62@tcp: [Session 2 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 0 dropped, 2 expired]
12345-10.9.4.63@tcp: [Session 7 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 0 dropped, 7 expired]
s:
Total 2 error nodes in s
session is ended
Total 0 error nodes in c
Total 2 error nodes in s
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In MDS1,3 (vm9) console log, we see&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt; [121187.820321] LNet: 14521:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121187.824636] LNet: 14521:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121187.827249] LNet: 14521:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121187.829223] LNet: 14521:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121187.836986] LustreError: 14519:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
[121187.839282] LustreError: 14519:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
[121187.841880] LustreError: 14519:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
[121187.844418] LustreError: 14519:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the OST (vm8) console log, we see similar errors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[121123.915520] LNet: 14142:0:(rpc.c:612:srpc_service_add_buffers()) waiting for adding buffer
[121203.866263] LNet: 14145:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121203.867961] LNet: 14145:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp, timeout 64.
[121203.868014] LustreError: 14143:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
[121203.871967] LustreError: 14143:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.61@tcp failed with -110
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We don&#8217;t see any errors in the client&#8217;s (vm6) console logs, but we do see errors in the second client&#8217;s (vm7) console log:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[121224.824446] LNet: 19344:0:(rpc.c:612:srpc_service_add_buffers()) waiting for adding buffer
[121231.318601] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp: -4
[121231.320803] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp has failed: -5
[121231.322989] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp: -4
[121231.325008] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp has failed: -5
[121231.327235] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp: -4
[121231.329236] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp has failed: -5
[121231.332035] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp: -4
[121231.334216] LustreError: 19345:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.63@tcp has failed: -5
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This error may be different from &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10073&quot; title=&quot;lnet-selftest test_smoke: lst Error found&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-10073&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-10073&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; since that ticket is for ping errors and these errors are brw errors and no ping errors are seen. Although they may have the same root cause.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In other recent lnet-selftest test smoke failures, &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e28426f6-ba77-11e8-b86b-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e28426f6-ba77-11e8-b86b-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt;, we also see dropped RPCs. From the test_log, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Batch is stopped
12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: [Session 33 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 12 dropped, 33 expired]
12345-10.9.4.251@tcp: [Session 5 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 2 dropped, 5 expired]
c:
Total 2 error nodes in c
12345-10.9.4.252@tcp: [Session 7 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 0 dropped, 7 expired]
12345-10.9.4.253@tcp: [Session 1 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 38 dropped, 1 expired]
12345-10.9.4.254@tcp: [Session 6 brw errors, 0 ping errors] [RPC: 0 errors, 0 dropped, 6 expired]
s:
Total 3 error nodes in s
session is ended
Total 2 error nodes in c
Total 3 error nodes in s
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the MDS (vm4) console log, we see&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[22157.131485] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22157.133877] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -4
[22157.136025] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22157.138193] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -4
[22157.140326] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22189.464106] LNet: 24932:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.251@tcp, timeout 64.
[22189.467885] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.251@tcp failed with -110
[22263.166107] LNetError: 6241:0:(lib-msg.c:794:lnet_is_health_check()) Msg is in inconsistent state, don&apos;t perform health checking (-125, 0)
[22263.170894] LNetError: 6241:0:(lib-msg.c:794:lnet_is_health_check()) Msg is in inconsistent state, don&apos;t perform health checking (-125, 0)
[22263.170903] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.170912] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22263.178407] LNetError: 6241:0:(lib-msg.c:794:lnet_is_health_check()) Msg is in inconsistent state, don&apos;t perform health checking (-125, 0)
[22263.178497] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.178505] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22263.184865] LNetError: 6241:0:(lib-msg.c:794:lnet_is_health_check()) Msg is in inconsistent state, don&apos;t perform health checking (-125, 0)
&#8230;
[22263.323774] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.327177] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22263.330541] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.333795] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22263.338011] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.341268] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22263.344774] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp: -125
[22263.348318] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.250@tcp has failed: -5
[22769.266186] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.251@tcp: -4
[22769.268133] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.251@tcp has failed: -5
[22769.270187] LustreError: 24882:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed for RPC from 12345-10.9.4.251@tcp: -4
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="53339">LU-11389</key>
            <summary>lnet-setltest test smoke fails with &#8216;lst Error found&#8217;</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="sharmaso">Sonia Sharma</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jamesanunez">James Nunez</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:30:06 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:06:33 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:27:41 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.12.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.12.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>7</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="233756" author="jamesanunez" created="Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:21:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sonia, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would you please investigate these failures? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233814" author="jamesanunez" created="Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:35:17 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;A few other comments on this issue:&lt;br/&gt;
All these failures are see for the full test group and none see for review-ldiskfs testing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There were no lnet-selftest errors of this kind in July 2018. We had 52 errors in August for the master branch. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For master, it looks like the first of these errors started on 2018-08-21 with 2.11.54.11; &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/391e400e-a539-11e8-a5f2-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/391e400e-a539-11e8-a5f2-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt; . We had some similar looking failures in early August, but they were interop testing or ppc testing. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233815" author="simmonsja" created="Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:55:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is due to lnet-selftest being broken with the new lnet health check system. This is a know problem.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233829" author="sharmaso" created="Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:02:57 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yes, lnet-selftest with health landing is not backward compatible anymore. So this should affect interop testing but not if just the current selftest module is being run with master&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233978" author="sharmaso" created="Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:39:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Atleast in one of the failure case - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/97e1a268-bacc-11e8-b86b-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/97e1a268-bacc-11e8-b86b-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
I see this -&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;
00000400:00000100:1.0:1537223442.459967:0:19291:0:(lib-move.c:2754:lnet_finalize_expired_responses()) Response timed out: md = ffff8a3826d47800
00000001:00020000:1.0:1537223442.460023:0:28328:0:(brw_test.c:415:brw_bulk_ready()) BRW bulk WRITE failed &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; RPC from 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp: -4
00000400:00000100:1.0:1537223442.462309:0:28328:0:(rpc.c:905:srpc_server_rpc_done()) Server RPC ffff8a37ce122400 done: service brw_test, peer 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp, status SWI_STATE_BULK_STARTED:-5
00000001:00020000:1.0:1537223442.462317:0:28328:0:(brw_test.c:389:brw_server_rpc_done()) Bulk transfer from 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp has failed: -5
00000400:00000100:1.0:1537223442.650594:0:19288:0:(lib-move.c:3783:lnet_parse_reply()) 10.9.4.83@tcp: Dropping REPLY from 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; invalid MD 0x1555319176943a6c.0x1ff0165
00000400:00000400:1.0:1537223897.120951:0:28330:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp, timeout 64.
00000400:00000400:1.0:1537223897.123778:0:28330:0:(rpc.c:1072:srpc_client_rpc_expired()) Client RPC expired: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp, timeout 64.
00000400:00000100:0.0:1537223897.123999:0:28328:0:(rpc.c:1146:srpc_client_rpc_done()) Client RPC done: service 11, peer 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp, status SWI_STATE_REQUEST_SENT:1:-4
00000001:00020000:0.0:1537223897.124015:0:28328:0:(brw_test.c:344:brw_client_done_rpc()) BRW RPC to 12345-10.9.4.81@tcp failed with -110
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This makes me think it might me because of the low transaction timeout value . We have this in &lt;tt&gt;lnet_monitor_thread()&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;
&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; (wakeup_counter &amp;gt;= lnet_transaction_timeout / 2) { &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;
3293 &#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;lnet_finalize_expired_responses(&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;false&lt;/span&gt;); &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;
3294 &#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;wakeup_counter = 0; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;
3295 &#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#187;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;&#183;}
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will upload a test patch with increased transaction timeout value and we can see if that affects the number of failure cases.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="233979" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:54:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sonia Sharma (sharmaso@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/33231&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/33231&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11389&quot; title=&quot;lnet-setltest test smoke fails with &#8216;lst Error found&#8217;&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-11389&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-11389&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: debug selftest failure&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: ad4b6882aa18df9bae668056e73ac7e98baee6b7&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="237558" author="adilger" created="Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:27:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Still seeing these failures on a regular basis - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/query?utf8=%E2%9C%93&amp;amp;warn%5Bnotice%5D=&amp;amp;test_set_script_id=c24874b2-4a56-11e0-a7f6-52540025f9af&amp;amp;status%5B%5D=FAIL&amp;amp;horizon=518400&amp;amp;commit=Update+results&amp;amp;buggable_class=SubTest&amp;amp;num_results=250&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;50 failures in the past week&lt;/a&gt;, which is about 23% of all runs, increasing to 45% of ARM runs:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/021c4e14-f01d-11e8-bfe1-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/021c4e14-f01d-11e8-bfe1-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/0512c886-f1c7-11e8-815b-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/0512c886-f1c7-11e8-815b-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/f7e4f2a6-edac-11e8-815b-52540065bddc&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/f7e4f2a6-edac-11e8-815b-52540065bddc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
:&lt;br/&gt;
:&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="237829" author="bruno" created="Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:08:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 at&#160;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/47f9f586-4a90-4174-a076-b9b808107082&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/47f9f586-4a90-4174-a076-b9b808107082&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="237973" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 5 Dec 2018 03:00:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/33231/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/33231/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11389&quot; title=&quot;lnet-setltest test smoke fails with &#8216;lst Error found&#8217;&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-11389&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-11389&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: increase lnet transaction timeout&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 73fdd1579d87c3fdaef71edaada0c4518cb00492&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="238046" author="pjones" created="Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:27:41 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.12&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="48588">LU-10073</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i002lb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>