https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11569 Lustre <p>we are seeing these error when issuing mkfs.lustre command:</p> <p>mkfs.lustre FATAL: "-O quota" must be supported by e2fsprogs, please upgrade your e2fsprogs.</p> <p> </p> <p>cli command issued:</p> <p><span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 ~&#93;</span># mkfs.lustre --reformat --ost --backfstype=ldiskfs --fsname=tempAA --index=8 --mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib /dev/sdd</p> <p>Permanent disk data:<br/> Target: tempAA:OST0008<br/> Index: 8<br/> Lustre FS: tempAA<br/> Mount type: ldiskfs<br/> Flags: 0x62<br/> (OST first_time update )<br/> Persistent mount opts: ,errors=remount-ro<br/> Parameters: mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>device size = 5723166MB</p> <p>mkfs.lustre FATAL: "-O quota" must be supported by e2fsprogs, please upgrade your e2fsprogs.</p> <p>mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 22<br/> mkfs.lustre: exiting with 22 (Invalid argument).  thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> LU-11569

mkfs.lustre return error to upgrade e2fsprogs

Bug Major Resolved Done WC Triage Abe Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:57:39 +0000 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:05:54 +0000 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:05:54 +0000 Lustre 2.11.0 0 3 <p>What version of e2fsprogs do you have? Do you have the Lustre e2fsprogs-1.42.13.wc5 at least?</p> <p>this is the version we have installed:</p> <p>root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms]# rpm -qa | grep e2fsprogs<br/> e2fsprogs-libs-1.42.9-12.el7_5.x86_64<br/> e2fsprogs-devel-1.42.9-12.el7_5.x86_64<br/> e2fsprogs-1.42.9-12.el7_5.x86_64<br/> e2fsprogs-static-1.42.9-12.el7_5.x86_64<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p>Abe</p> <p>Try with the latest Lustre-specific version - <a href="https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/e2fsprogs/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/e2fsprogs/</a> </p> <p>Peter</p> <p>I went ahead and upgrade e2fs to rev wc5, however an issue come up with ldiskfs module not loaded!!</p> <p> </p> <p><span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 ~&#93;</span># mkfs.lustre --reformat --ost --backfstype=ldiskfs --fsname=tempAA --index=8 --mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib /dev/sdd</p> <p>Permanent disk data:<br/> Target: tempAA:OST0008<br/> Index: 8<br/> Lustre FS: tempAA<br/> Mount type: ldiskfs<br/> Flags: 0x62<br/> (OST first_time update )<br/> Persistent mount opts: ,errors=remount-ro<br/> Parameters: mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib</p> <p>device size = 5723166MB<br/> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/sdd<br/> target name tempAA:OST0008<br/> 4k blocks 1465130646<br/> options -J size=400 -I 512 -i 524288 -q -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,flex_bg -G 256 -E resize="4290772992",lazy_journal_init -F<br/> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L tempAA:OST0008 -J size=400 -I 512 -i 524288 -q -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,flex_bg -G 256 -E resize="4290772992",lazy_journal_init -F /dev/sdd 1465130646<br/> mkfs.lustre: Unable to mount /dev/sdd: No such device<br/> Is the ldiskfs module available?</p> <p>mkfs.lustre FATAL: failed to write local files<br/> mkfs.lustre: exiting with 19 (No such device)<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 ~&#93;</span># dkms status<br/> lustre-all, 2.11.0, 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> spl, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> zfs, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 ~&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>root@oss100 ~]# modprobe ldiskfs<br/> modprobe: FATAL: Module ldiskfs not found.<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 ~&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p>Hi Peter/Andreas,</p> <p> </p> <p>any ideas what is causing this ?</p> <p> </p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p> </p> <p>I would imagine your ldiskfs module is not installed or does not match the current kernel version, so it can't be loaded?</p> <p>ldiskfs appears to be installed, is there anything that we are missing ?</p> <p>root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms]# rpm -qa | grep osd<br/> kmod-lustre-osd-ldiskfs-2.11.0-1.el7.x86_64<br/> lustre-osd-ldiskfs-mount-2.11.0-1.el7.x86_64<br/> lustre-osd-zfs-mount-2.11.0-1.el7.x86_64<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p><span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms&#93;</span># dkms status<br/> lustre-all, 2.11.0: added<br/> spl, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> spl, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> zfs, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> zfs, 0.7.6, 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64, x86_64: installed<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 lustre-2.11-rpms&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p>Does "modprobe ldiskfs" result in the ldiskfs module being loaded? What does "modinfo ldiskfs" report and "uname -a"?</p> <p><span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span># modprobe ldiskfs<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span># modinfo ldiskfs<br/> filename: /lib/modules/3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64/extra/lustre-osd-ldiskfs/fs/ldiskfs.ko<br/> license: GPL<br/> description: Fourth Extended Filesystem<br/> author: Remy Card, Stephen Tweedie, Andrew Morton, Andreas Dilger, Theodore Ts'o and others<br/> alias: fs-ldiskfs<br/> retpoline: Y<br/> rhelversion: 7.4<br/> srcversion: 754AF59D82FDB7BC80F3A5E<br/> depends: mbcache,jbd2<br/> vermagic: 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64 SMP mod_unload modversions <br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span>#</p> <p><span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span># uname -a<br/> Linux oss100 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 3 17:48:49 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span>#</p> <p> </p> <p>Hmm that seems to have worked after issuing mod probe ldiskfs</p> <p>mkfs.lustre --reformat --ost --backfstype=ldiskfs --fsname=tempAA --index=8 --mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib /dev/sdb</p> <p>Permanent disk data:<br/> Target: tempAA:OST0008<br/> Index: 8<br/> Lustre FS: tempAA<br/> Mount type: ldiskfs<br/> Flags: 0x62<br/> (OST first_time update )<br/> Persistent mount opts: ,errors=remount-ro<br/> Parameters: mgsnode=10.10.10.251@o2ib</p> <p>device size = 160233472MB<br/> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/sdb<br/> target name tempAA:OST0008<br/> 4k blocks 41019768832<br/> options -J size=400 -I 512 -i 1048576 -q -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,64bit,flex_bg -G 256 -E lazy_journal_init -F<br/> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L tempAA:OST0008 -J size=400 -I 512 -i 1048576 -q -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,quota,huge_file,64bit,flex_bg -G 256 -E lazy_journal_init -F /dev/sdb 41019768832<br/> Writing CONFIGS/mountdata<br/> <span class="error">&#91;root@oss100 IntelOPA-Basic.RHEL74-x86_64.10.7.0.0.145&#93;</span>#</p> <p>Is there any documentation on how to benchmark ldiskfs, is obdsurvery supported on this release ?</p> <p> </p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Abe</p> <p> </p> <p>Lustre e2fsprogs was not installed, problem was resolved once installed.</p> Development Rank 1|i0052v: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity