https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11637 Lustre <p>It looks reasonable to add the following Maloo functionality: automatically re-start the sessions failed due to known issues. If Maloo has all failures associated with LU tickets it will be more effective if Maloo will re-start the sessions by itself instead of waiting patch developer attention.<br/> We have such functionality in our automation, this finally saves the time for developers.<br/> Thanks.</p> LU-11637

Maloo should restart the sessions automatically if tests failed with known issue

Improvement Major Closed Won't Fix James Nunez Elena Gryaznova Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:17:07 +0000 Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:12:12 +0000 Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:12:12 +0000 0 5 <p>It is even more desirable the following improvement:<br/> Maloo is to set +1 if there are only the failures due to known issues and all are associated with LU tickets.</p> <p>I agree with Elena, it makes process more efficient. @James Nunez any thoughts? </p> <p>I also faced the issue.</p> <p>Example from <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33391/3." class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33391/3.</a></p> <p>sanityn_101a is set as failed in <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/5c08b8e3-4908-408d-b015-cedd83a40854" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/5c08b8e3-4908-408d-b015-cedd83a40854</a> , however it matches <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10279" title="sanityn test_101c: FAIL: Found WRITE RPC but expect none " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10279"><del>LU-10279</del></a>.</p> <p>More examples:</p> <p><a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a5ef946e-ecdb-11e8-adf2-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a5ef946e-ecdb-11e8-adf2-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>test 80f failed with known failure <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11366" title="replay-single timeout test 80f: rm: cannot remove &#39;/mnt/lustre/d80f.replay-single/remote_dir&#39;: Input/output error" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-11366"><del>LU-11366</del></a> and didn't marked as known - had to associate a bug by hands</p> <p>Another strange thing is a test suits marked as FAIL despite there is no failed tests.<br/> For example - insanity, replay-ost-single, sanity-quota, sanity-flr and sanity-pfl here <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/e8ac067a-da35-4aea-896b-e40f5f4b3029" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/e8ac067a-da35-4aea-896b-e40f5f4b3029</a></p> <p>according to above link replay-ost-single hasn't started - "subtests passed" field is 0/0</p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=jamesanunez" class="user-hover" rel="jamesanunez">jamesanunez</a>, do you have an estimate about how difficult it would be to implement this enhancement? Is it possible to bang out in short order (now to help prepare for 2.15.0)?</p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=jamesanunz" class="user-hover" rel="jamesanunz">jamesanunz</a>, I think that this could help everyone a lot. I don't really know how difficult it would be though. Do you think it is worth it? <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=pjones" class="user-hover" rel="pjones">pjones</a>, perhaps we can chat about it at an upcoming LWG call?</p> <p>We talked about this during a recent OpenSFS LWG call and everyone agreed that we should not implement automatic restart of test sessions.</p> Development Rank 1|i005xz: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807