https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11900 Lustre <p>1 MDT hit following LBUG during recovery on soak after running 15 hours, it looks like <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6190" title="replay-single test_73a: (ldlm_lib.c:1389:target_finish_recovery()) LBUG" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6190"><del>LU-6190</del></a>, but that ticket is too old, open new one to track</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>[ 1119.601893] sd 0:0:0:44: rdac: array soak-netapp5660-1, ctlr 0, queueing MODE_SELECT command [ 1120.258577] sd 0:0:0:44: rdac: array soak-netapp5660-1, ctlr 0, MODE_SELECT completed [ 1120.288628] Lustre: soaked-MDT0002: Recovery over after 3:19, of 28 clients 28 recovered and 57 were evicted. [ 1120.354278] LustreError: 14264:0:(ldlm_lib.c:1593:target_finish_recovery()) soaked-MDT0002: Recovery queues ( lock ) are not empty [ 1120.367393] LustreError: 14264:0:(ldlm_lib.c:1595:target_finish_recovery()) LBUG [ 1120.375656] Pid: 14264, comm: tgt_recover_2 3.10.0-957.el7_lustre.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 7 20:06:41 UTC 2019 [ 1120.386533] Call Trace: [ 1120.389272] [&lt;ffffffffc09e67cc&gt;] libcfs_call_trace+0x8c/0xc0 [libcfs] [ 1120.396592] [&lt;ffffffffc09e687c&gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x4c/0xa0 [libcfs] [ 1120.403512] [&lt;ffffffffc0d35479&gt;] target_recovery_thread+0x1359/0x1370 [ptlrpc] [ 1120.411766] [&lt;ffffffffb00c1c31&gt;] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [ 1120.417229] [&lt;ffffffffb0774c37&gt;] ret_from_fork_nospec_end+0x0/0x39 [ 1120.424239] [&lt;ffffffffffffffff&gt;] 0xffffffffffffffff [ 1120.429817] Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG [ 1120.434583] CPU: 27 PID: 14264 Comm: tgt_recover_2 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE ------------ 3.10.0-957.el7_lustre.x86_64 #1 [ 1120.448260] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600GZ ........../S2600GZ, BIOS SE5C600.86B.01.08.0003.022620131521 02/26/2013 [ 1120.460781] Call Trace: [ 1120.463512] [&lt;ffffffffb0761dc1&gt;] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [ 1120.469239] [&lt;ffffffffb075b4d0&gt;] panic+0xe8/0x21f [ 1120.474590] [&lt;ffffffffc09e68cb&gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xa0 [libcfs] [ 1120.481517] [&lt;ffffffffc0d35479&gt;] target_recovery_thread+0x1359/0x1370 [ptlrpc] [ 1120.489698] [&lt;ffffffffc0d34120&gt;] ? replay_request_or_update.isra.21+0x8c0/0x8c0 [ptlrpc] [ 1120.498846] [&lt;ffffffffb00c1c31&gt;] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [ 1120.504291] [&lt;ffffffffb00c1b60&gt;] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 [ 1120.511094] [&lt;ffffffffb0774c37&gt;] ret_from_fork_nospec_begin+0x21/0x21 [ 1120.518380] [&lt;ffffffffb00c1b60&gt;] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset </pre> </div></div> server and client: 2.10.6_34_gb5ad8a0 LU-11900

MDT hit (ldlm_lib.c:1595:target_finish_recovery()) LBUG during recovery

Bug Minor Closed Cannot Reproduce Mikhail Pershin Sarah Liu Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:17:36 +0000 Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:34:38 +0000 Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:34:38 +0000 Lustre 2.10.7 0 6 <p>Mike</p> <p>Could you please advise?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>This is caused by <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33977/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33977/</a> landing.</p> <p>I pushed a revert to <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34149/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34149/</a></p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=hongchao.zhang" class="user-hover" rel="hongchao.zhang">hongchao.zhang</a> do you understand why this might affect only b2_10 not master?</p> <p>the patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33977/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/33977/</a> depends on the patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34027/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34027/</a><br/> I have pushed the two patches at the same time (push #33977 on top of #34027), does the landing process not check<br/> the dependency? sorry!</p> <p>the dependance patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34027/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/34027/</a> has been landed on b2_10</p> <p>I think that this can be closed as cannot repro now, right?</p> Development Rank 1|i00aif: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity