https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11993 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nclark@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f7fd52b8-1a2c-11e9-a2cc-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f7fd52b8-1a2c-11e9-a2cc-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>test_2c failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Failure in replication; differences found. </pre> </div></div> <p>Multiple occurences of unlink failing on targets:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>***** Start 2057 UNLNK (6) [0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0] [0x2000088d1:0x113:0x0] RESULTS.XLS ***** remove: /tmp/target/.lustrerepl/[0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0]; rc=-2, errno=2 remove: /tmp/target/d2c.lustre-rsync-test/clients/client1/~dmtmp/EXCEL/RESULTS.XLS; rc1=-2, errno=2 remove: /tmp/target2/.lustrerepl/[0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0]; rc=-2, errno=2 remove: /tmp/target2/d2c.lustre-rsync-test/clients/client1/~dmtmp/EXCEL/RESULTS.XLS; rc1=-2, errno=2 ##### End 2057 UNLNK (6) [0x2000088d1:0x1ca:0x0] [0x2000088d1:0x113:0x0] RESULTS.XLS rc=-2 ##### </pre> </div></div> <p>Might this be a DCO issue?</p> <p>VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV<br/> lustre-rsync-test test_2c - Failure in replication; differences found.</p> LU-11993

lustre-rsync-test test_2c: remove from target yields rc=-2

Bug Minor Open Unresolved WC Triage Maloo dne zfs Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:25:53 +0000 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:10:12 +0000 Lustre 2.12.1 Lustre 2.14.0 0 5 <p>+1 on master <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc</a> along with 13 others in the past 4 weeks.</p> <p>Another similar but not the same one:</p> <p>Error: 'Failure in replication; differences found.' </p> <p><a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/50757dfa-cb38-11e9-97d5-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>Is there any real usage of lustre_rsync anywhere by anybody? If not, I am wondering whether removing the tool is proper. That would save a lot of maintaining effort for sure.</p> <p>If we look for recent tickets related to lustre_rsync. Most of them (<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11479" title="Error replicating xattr for /tmp/target/d8.lustre-rsync-test/d07/d073/b4: 2" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-11479"><del>LU-11479</del></a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11233" title="gcc8 support" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-11233"><del>LU-11233</del></a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10989" title="lustre_rsync may clear an unconsumed record after a CL_RENAME" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10989"><del>LU-10989</del></a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10978" title="lustre-rsync-test test 1A cannot replicate a hard link because file exists" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10978"><del>LU-10978</del></a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10508" title="lustre_rsync should not use system()" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10508"><del>LU-10508</del></a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10515" title="lustre_rsync should not call register_ioc_dev()" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10515"><del>LU-10515</del></a>) are test failures and compilation failures, zero actually usage problem. That implies we spend a lot of effort to maintain it without any benefit.</p> <p>One value of lustre_rsync is using it as a test case of Changelog. But we could use the same effort to improve Changelog specific test codes and that would be more efficient.</p> <p>It looks like this happened again</p> <p><a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8ed1d74a-6e16-4ac2-928f-d636f5f4a49e" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8ed1d74a-6e16-4ac2-928f-d636f5f4a49e</a></p> <p>+1 on master <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/047c442e-171d-42c1-8f44-196618efbf45" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/047c442e-171d-42c1-8f44-196618efbf45</a></p> Development Rank 1|i00c33: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity