<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:59:29 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-13227] sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. </title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Size error: expected 0x659000 stat 0x145d12 seek 0x659000&lt;br/&gt;
LOG DUMP (849 total operations):&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Full logs could be found here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing-archive.whamcloud.com/gerrit-janitor/6308/testresults/sanityn-ldiskfs-DNE-centos7_x86_64-centos7_x86_64/sanityn.test_16a.test_log.oleg357-client.log&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing-archive.whamcloud.com/gerrit-janitor/6308/testresults/sanityn-ldiskfs-DNE-centos7_x86_64-centos7_x86_64/sanityn.test_16a.test_log.oleg357-client.log&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;The problem might be related to following cases:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Client A try to ftruncate file to file_size.&lt;br/&gt;
2) Client B Direct Write (punch hole )to update new_file_size.&lt;br/&gt;
3) Client A try to stat file to check whether it could get new_file_size, but got old file_size instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="58039">LU-13227</key>
            <summary>sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. </summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="wshilong">Wang Shilong</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="wshilong">Wang Shilong</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:49:25 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:33:52 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:30:19 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.14.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="262988" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:01:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;reverting &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4198&quot; title=&quot;Improve IO performance when using DIRECT IO using libaio&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-4198&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-4198&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; clio: turn on lockless for some kind of IO fixes the problem..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="262990" author="wshilong" created="Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:09:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yup, that patch looks very likely related, but i am still trying to understand resons.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263149" author="wshilong" created="Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:25:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=bzzz&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;bzzz&quot;&gt;bzzz&lt;/a&gt; Alex, would you mind sharing your configurations to reproduce the problem? , really strange for me, i could not reproduce this.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263150" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:28:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;in kvm:&lt;br/&gt;
FSTYPE=ldiskfs MDSCOUNT=2 OSTSIZE=2800000  REFORMAT=yes bash sanityn.sh&lt;br/&gt;
or FSTYPE=ldiskfs MDSCOUNT=1 OSTSIZE=2800000 REFORMAT=yes bash sanityn.sh&lt;/p&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="263152" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:54:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I can reproduce quite easily..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263212" author="wshilong" created="Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:21:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Still no lock to reproduce locally.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking at existed client debug log, i see Glimpse lock is aborted which might be reason why stat did not get correct inode size:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;00010000:2.0:1581153364.494156:0:25749:0:(glimpse.c:91:cl_glimpse_lock()) Glimpsing inode [0x200000402:0x2a:0x0]
18708 00000008:00010000:2.0:1581153364.494169:0:25749:0:(lustre_osc.h:189:osc_enq2ldlm_flags()) flags: a
18709 00000008:00010000:2.0:1581153364.494171:0:25749:0:(osc_lock.c:1263:osc_lock_init()) ### lock ffff8800ad8f9470, osc lock ffff88009de1cec0, flags 0x1002
18710 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.494216:0:25749:0:(ldlm_lock.c:767:ldlm_lock_addref_internal_nolock()) ### ldlm_lock_addref(PR) ns: ?? lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x59      6038eac042fda6 lrc: 3/1,0 mode: --/PR res: ?? rrc=?? type: ??? flags: 0x10000000000000 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18711 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.494220:0:25749:0:(ldlm_request.c:1015:ldlm_cli_enqueue()) ### client-side enqueue START, flags 0x1000 ns: lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff      88009f100800 lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x596038eac042fda6 lrc: 3/1,0 mode: --/PR res: [0xf:0x0:0x0].0x0 rrc: 2 type: EXT [0-&amp;gt;18446744073709551615] (req 0-&amp;gt;1844674407      3709551615) flags: 0x0 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
00100000:2.0:1581153364.494283:0:3946:0:(client.c:1736:ptlrpc_send_new_req()) Sending RPC req@ffff8800a3aa7b40 pname:cluuid:pid:xid:nid:opc:job ptlrpcd_0      1_01:b19943a4-a4de-4:3946:1657958989738368:192.168.203.157@tcp:101:fsx.0
18713 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500520:0:3946:0:(ldlm_lock.c:767:ldlm_lock_addref_internal_nolock()) ### ldlm_lock_addref(PR) ns: ?? lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x596      038eac042fda6 lrc: 6/2,0 mode: --/PR res: ?? rrc=?? type: ??? flags: 0x10000000000000 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18714 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500532:0:3946:0:(ldlm_request.c:631:ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini()) ### client-side enqueue END (ABORTED) ns: lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff880      09f100800 lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x596038eac042fda6 lrc: 6/2,0 mode: --/PR res: [0xf:0x0:0x0].0x0 rrc: 2 type: EXT [0-&amp;gt;18446744073709551615] (req 0-&amp;gt;1844674407370      9551615) flags: 0x0 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18715 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500544:0:3946:0:(ldlm_request.c:558:failed_lock_cleanup()) ### setting FL_LOCAL_ONLY | LDLM_FL_FAILED | LDLM_FL_ATOMIC_CB | LDLM_      FL_CBPENDING ns: lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff88009f100800 lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x596038eac042fda6 lrc: 6/2,0 mode: --/PR res: [0xf:0x0:0x0].0x0 rrc: 2 type: EXT [0-&amp;gt;      18446744073709551615] (req 0-&amp;gt;18446744073709551615) flags: 0x206400000000 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18716 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500548:0:3946:0:(ldlm_lock.c:821:ldlm_lock_decref_internal_nolock()) ### ldlm_lock_decref(PR) ns: ?? lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x596      038eac042fda6 lrc: 6/2,0 mode: --/PR res: ?? rrc=?? type: ??? flags: 0x10206400000000 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18717 00010000:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500552:0:3946:0:(ldlm_lock.c:912:ldlm_lock_decref_internal()) ### do not add lock into lru list ns: ?? lock: ffff8800a26fed80/0x5      96038eac042fda6 lrc: 5/1,0 mode: --/PR res: ?? rrc=?? type: ??? flags: 0x10206400000000 nid: local remote: 0x0 expref: -99 pid: 25749 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
18718 00000008:00010000:2.0:1581153364.500561:0:3946:0:(osc_lock.c:197:osc_lock_lvb_update()) ### no dlm lock: acquired size 1334546, setting rss=1334546; leaving kms=0      , end=18446744073709551615
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263220" author="wshilong" created="Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:01:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It looks EABORTED is a normal case for glimpse lock, but it is not clear where ofd_intent_policy() return that kind of error, sanityn.sh is using&lt;br/&gt;
default debug, might make sense to enable more to debug.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263221" author="bzzz" created="Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:02:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;the second log should be full?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263223" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:09:38 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Wang Shilong (wshilong@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/37558&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/37558&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227&quot; title=&quot;sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; test: enable trace for sanityn 16a&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: bddff67f203e875c3618035e6777c85115103a2a&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263225" author="wshilong" created="Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:15:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=bzzz&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;bzzz&quot;&gt;bzzz&lt;/a&gt; you are right, i missed second log.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263440" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:10:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m suggesting to revert the patch given the problem behind isn&apos;t that obvious.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="263443" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:59:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Wang Shilong (wshilong@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/37611&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/37611&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227&quot; title=&quot;sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; llite: still enqueue lock for DIO&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: cba494ba69b8aefa060e0f9a09d5c6b4ab7cc7c0&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264331" author="gerrit" created="Sun, 1 Mar 2020 05:37:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/37611/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/37611/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227&quot; title=&quot;sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; LDLM: update LVB if it is server lock&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 3b5c670e65b5f3924e014ab1d030e6f45e2999d3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264355" author="pjones" created="Sun, 1 Mar 2020 15:55:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.14&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264427" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:21:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;still failing on my setup..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264430" author="wshilong" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:27:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=bzzz&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;bzzz&quot;&gt;bzzz&lt;/a&gt; Would you double check that is not ENOSPC errors? potentially that could be caused by:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/35896/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/35896/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264431" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:30:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I think so.. you can find logs here: &lt;a href=&quot;https://disk.yandex.com/d/z2s2BUC-M4EIgQ&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://disk.yandex.com/d/z2s2BUC-M4EIgQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
this is the latest master:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;bfaa8a0686 2020-03-02 | &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13314&quot; title=&quot;sanity test_56ob: lfs find /mnt/lustre/d56ob.sanity -mtime 1y&amp;#39; wrong: found 0, expected 1&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13314&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13314&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; test: add 56ob to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for now (origin/master, origin/HEAD) &lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;Wang Shilong&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="264432" author="wshilong" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:34:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hmm..i could not access url logs, would you mind uploading it here?&lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264433" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:37:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;sure, please find.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264528" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:30:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Wang Shilong (wshilong@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/37790&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/37790&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227&quot; title=&quot;sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ldlm: update lvb before dropping server lock&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 75eafe50f942e1c412b673579e57a311cc46cac0&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264530" author="wshilong" created="Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:32:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=bzzz&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;bzzz&quot;&gt;bzzz&lt;/a&gt; Would you mind applying the above new patch to see if it help fix your problem?&lt;br/&gt;
At least i try ram OST with repeated tests 200, did not reproduce.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264535" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:05:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;sure, it&apos;s been running now..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264537" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:35:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;failed with an assertion:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == replay-single test 20b: write, unlink, eviction, replay (test mds_cleanup_orphans) ================ 17:33:05 (1583325185)
Lustre: Setting parameter lustre-MDT0000-mdtlov.lov.stripesize in log lustre-MDT0000
Lustre: 28814:0:(genops.c:1709:obd_export_evict_by_uuid()) lustre-MDT0000: evicting 8ef1b02c-3fd5-4 at adminstrative request
LustreError: 28814:0:(mdt_lvb.c:176:mdt_dom_lvbo_update()) ASSERTION( env ) failed: 
LustreError: 28814:0:(mdt_lvb.c:176:mdt_dom_lvbo_update()) LBUG
Pid: 28814, comm: lctl 4.18.0 #32 SMP Wed Jan 15 22:22:45 MSK 2020
Call Trace:
 libcfs_call_trace+0x71/0x90 [libcfs]
 lbug_with_loc+0x3e/0x80 [libcfs]
 ? mdt_dom_lvbo_update+0x8ab/0x9c0 [mdt]
 ? ldlm_lock_decref_internal+0x33f/0xb70 [ptlrpc]
 ? ldlm_lock_decref_and_cancel+0x6f/0x130 [ptlrpc]
 ? mdt_dom_discard_data+0x490/0x550 [mdt]
 ? barrier_exit+0x27/0x60 [ptlrpc]
 ? mdd_trans_stop+0x28/0x15d [mdd]
 ? mdt_mfd_close+0x6ab/0x3080 [mdt]
 ? lu_context_fini+0x72/0x180 [obdclass]
 ? mdt_ctxt_add_dirty_flag.isra.0+0x111/0x160 [mdt]
 ? mdt_obd_disconnect+0x3a3/0x510 [mdt]
 ? class_fail_export+0x1ce/0x4e0 [obdclass]
 ? obd_export_evict_by_uuid+0xdb/0x1e0 [obdclass]
 ? lprocfs_evict_client_seq_write+0x1e8/0x2a0 [obdclass]
 ? mdt_mds_evict_client_write+0x417/0x6e0 [mdt]
 ? proc_reg_write+0x35/0x60
 ? __vfs_write+0x1f/0x160
 ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x9/0x50
 ? __sb_start_write+0x13f/0x1a0
 ? vfs_write+0x183/0x1b0
 ? vfs_write+0xba/0x1b0
 ? ksys_write+0x3d/0xa0
 ? do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x1a0
 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264541" author="wshilong" created="Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:11:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;sorry, need make sure only update LVB with IO context, update patch again, &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/37790/5&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/37790/5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
shall fix the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="264616" author="wshilong" created="Thu, 5 Mar 2020 02:29:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve added a simple reproduced test to the patch and verify with/without patch it works.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="265061" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 11 Mar 2020 02:19:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/37790/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/37790/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13227&quot; title=&quot;sanityn 16a  FAIL: fsx with O_DIRECT failed. &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: update lvb before dropping server lock&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 92d799217aeac4e1e859264d157c62e0f02b83a8&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="355676" author="bzzz" created="Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:33:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m still hitting this on master:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;065500&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;0&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; 1670492005.778405 trunc from 0x870187  to  0x19dc98	(0x6d24ee bytes)&lt;br/&gt;
Size error: expected 0x94fbcf stat 0x92b000 seek 0x92b000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="62287">LU-14314</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="34286" name="sanityn.test_16a.debug_log.tmp.1581518737.log.bz2" size="3444578" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:49:21 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="34287" name="sanityn.test_16a.debug_log.tmp.1581518998.log.bz2" size="4040657" author="bzzz" created="Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:54:31 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="34375" name="sanityn.test_16a.debug_log.tmp.1583187625.log.gz" size="179915" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:37:18 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="34376" name="serial.txt" size="68041" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:37:18 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="34377" name="stdout.txt" size="209795" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 3 Mar 2020 00:37:19 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i00thb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>