<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 03:00:36 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-13359] change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13359</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;With &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/35615&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/35615&lt;/a&gt;&#160;&quot;lfs quota --pool&quot; shows correct soft/hard limit and grace time. However used is still the same with used without --pool option, i.e. it prints used for all OSTs in a system. print_obd_quota should be changed to take into account only OSTs from appropriate quota pool. I would like to do this in a separate ticket to make 35615 as small as possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="58363">LU-13359</key>
            <summary>change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool</summary>
                <type id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11318&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Task</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="scherementsev">Sergey Cheremencev</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="scherementsev">Sergey Cheremencev</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:52:18 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:43:58 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 13:16:32 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.14.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.14.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="265245" author="paf0186" created="Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:10:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sergey,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A thought: I would do this as a patch on top of 35615, and I think it could use the same LU.&#160; I did this sort of approach for SEL - Generated a patch series, all associated with one ticket.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a fix that is not relevant except with 35615, right?&#160; If so, I think it&apos;s clearer to just put another patch associated with the original LU.&#160; If I&apos;ve misunderstood and this fix makes sense &lt;b&gt;without&lt;/b&gt; 35615, then never mind. &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="265332" author="sergey" created="Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:41:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Patrick!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Glad to see you hear &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A thought: I would do this as a patch on top of 35615, and I think it could use the same LU.&#160; I did this sort of approach for SEL - Generated a patch series, all associated with one ticket.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That would be nice and yes a patch on top of 35615 is a correct place as there is already an option to show/set quota for the pol.&lt;br/&gt;
If so, I will close this ticket - I created it mostly to don&apos;t forget about this problem.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="274666" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:40:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sergey Cheremencev (sergey.cheremencev@hpe.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/39298&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/39298&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13359&quot; title=&quot;change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13359&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13359&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; quota: make used for pool correct&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 58ebb595ee9f1e28cd4ef8ce2e3d26dcd92c9860&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="274679" author="adilger" created="Tue, 7 Jul 2020 22:14:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;While Patrick&apos;s comments were OK &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11023&quot; title=&quot;OST Pool Quotas&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-11023&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-11023&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; patches were landed, it is better to use separate tickets for issues found &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11023&quot; title=&quot;OST Pool Quotas&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-11023&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-11023&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; patches are landed and the ticket closed, as was done with this patch.  Otherwise, it is difficult to track patches that &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to land to 2.14 in order to make this feature work properly.  I&apos;ve changed this over to &quot;&lt;tt&gt;Fix Version: 2.14.0&lt;/tt&gt; and &quot;&lt;tt&gt;Critical&lt;/tt&gt;&quot; so that it is tracked properly.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="277405" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 13 Aug 2020 05:58:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/39298/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/39298/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13359&quot; title=&quot;change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13359&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13359&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; quota: make used for pool correct&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 6b9f849fd5f49ce68e6102f9c79f52eb11bf949d&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="277442" author="pjones" created="Thu, 13 Aug 2020 13:16:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.14&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="277499" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 14 Aug 2020 04:06:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Neil Brown (neilb@suse.de) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/39676&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/39676&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13359&quot; title=&quot;change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13359&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13359&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; quota: call rhashtable_lookup near params decl&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 11f22d965757d0535165ef58fc01d5c4d3aeb327&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="279430" author="gerrit" created="Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:43:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/39676/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/39676/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13359&quot; title=&quot;change lfs quota --pool to print used based only on OSTs from the pool&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-13359&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-13359&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; quota: call rhashtable_lookup near params decl&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1d116c8ff68fc784141b647b790e4b4861460797&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="52249">LU-11023</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10030" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:labels">
                        <customfieldname>Epic/Theme</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                        <label>quota</label>
    
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i00vfr:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>