<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 03:01:58 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-13518] Lustre 2.12.4 on Centos 7.8 ? When does 2.12.5 come out ?</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13518</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br/&gt;
I have to simple questions:&lt;br/&gt;
1) Will lustre 2.12.4 client/server run on Centos 7.8 just fine ?  I didn&apos;t see it as a support version in the documentation.&lt;br/&gt;
2) When do you think lustre 2.12.5 will come out ?&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br/&gt;
Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>Centos 7.7 and 7.8 on various hardware.</environment>
        <key id="59049">LU-13518</key>
            <summary>Lustre 2.12.4 on Centos 7.8 ? When does 2.12.5 come out ?</summary>
                <type id="9" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/issuetypes/undefined.png">Question/Request</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="pjones">Peter Jones</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="mre64">Michael Ethier</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 5 May 2020 15:33:48 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:23:21 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:23:21 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.12.4</version>
                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="269321" author="pjones" created="Tue, 5 May 2020 16:29:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are working on a 2.12.5 release ATM that will support Centos 7.8. Our WIP is viewable at &lt;a href=&quot;https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12&lt;/a&gt; . The exact timing of the release is somewhat dependent on what issues are found during testing but we are aiming to have something out this month&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="269322" author="mre64" created="Tue, 5 May 2020 16:38:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Thanks Peter, and do you know what version of MLNX OFED will be supported for Lustre 2.12.5 ?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="269329" author="pjones" created="Tue, 5 May 2020 18:55:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We are deliberating between MOFED 5.0.2 and an as-yet-unreleased MOFED 4.9.x version that I had heard was coming out. Do you have any preference in this regard?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="269339" author="mre64" created="Tue, 5 May 2020 22:26:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t have a preference. Being that we use Lustre for much of our large multi-pedabyte storage deployments, I would pick the version that will provide maximum stability and performance, but would lean more towards stability &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="271454" author="mre64" created="Thu, 28 May 2020 20:40:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter, just to update this - we are installing MLNX OFED 4.7-1.0.0.1 on our lustre FS server and on our lnet routers. So, if you can support that version too with lustre 2.12.5 that would be great.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="271456" author="pjones" created="Thu, 28 May 2020 21:14:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can definitely be flexible with variation on kernel and MOFED and will work on reported issues, but want to make clear that our testing will be focused on MOFED 4.9 so it would be prudent to do some testing yourself before going into production.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="271457" author="mre64" created="Thu, 28 May 2020 21:19:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Peter, ok thanks. BTW, do you have a release date for support for Centos 7.8 ? We are hitting against systems we are trying to install with Centos 7.8 and no lustre support. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="271463" author="pjones" created="Thu, 28 May 2020 22:02:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We tagged RC1 yesterday if you are interesting in testing it out. The exact timeline for the release will depend on how testing goes.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="272823" author="adilger" created="Sat, 13 Jun 2020 05:23:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Lustre 2.12.5 has been released.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i00zjb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>