https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for wangshilong &lt;wshilong@ddn.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e251a96e-a78a-4afe-b5dd-7fca780a76cf" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e251a96e-a78a-4afe-b5dd-7fca780a76cf</a></p> <p>test_205 failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Should have failed </pre> </div></div> <p>&lt;&lt;Please provide additional information about the failure here&gt;&gt;</p> <p>VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV<br/> sanity-lnet test_205 - Should have failed</p> LU-13701

sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Serguei Smirnov Maloo arm Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:51:12 +0000 Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:34:51 +0000 Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:35:28 +0000 Lustre 2.14.0 Lustre 2.14.0 0 7 <p>+1 on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/88ec3640-5fdc-466e-8a5e-3d35ac7b5ea7" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/88ec3640-5fdc-466e-8a5e-3d35ac7b5ea7</a></p> <p>James Nunez (jnunez@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/39155" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/39155</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701" title="sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13701"><del>LU-13701</del></a> tests: stop running sanity-lnet 205<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 7d996ad38aac5ac5f4f32d598f6816229cc9300a</p> <p>Do we know when these failures started? Are they because of newly landed subtests, or possibly new lnet changes or a kernel update?</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/39155/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/39155/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701" title="sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13701"><del>LU-13701</del></a> tests: stop running sanity-lnet tests<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 32155957a7de12a2324dc184350c737f8c1650d1</p> <p>The patch that landed adds sanity-lnet tests 204, 205, 206, 207 and 208 to the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list and is not a fix for this issue. </p> <p>This ticket should remain open until we understand and fix this issue. </p> <p>As noted in <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13704" title="sanity-lnet test_204: local_interrupt unrecognized - &quot;Should have failed&quot;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13704"><del>LU-13704</del></a>, there seems to be some problem with the lctl net_drop_add command:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>error: net_drop_add: option 'local_error' unrecognized error: net_drop_add: option 'local_error' unrecognized </pre> </div></div> <p>Serguei Smirnov (ssmirnov@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/40036" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/40036</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701" title="sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13701"><del>LU-13701</del></a> utils: fix usage of getopt_long in portals<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: bc69b387112a8cfb03a313a4e82028ef3433a63e</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/40036/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/40036/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701" title="sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13701"><del>LU-13701</del></a> utils: fix usage of getopt_long in portals<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 404bb62da49ca33bdc6e287a12e69d086a1fa4c2</p> <p>Landed for 2.14</p> <p>"Frank Sehr &lt;fsehr@whamcloud.com&gt;" uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49063" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49063</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-13701" title="sanity-lnet test_205: @@@@@@ FAIL: Should have failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-13701"><del>LU-13701</del></a> utils: fix usage of getopt_long in portals<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_12<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 7783a78d27ffebad9e58241655b63a21cf21db60</p> Duplicate LU-16185 Related LU-13704 Development Rank 1|i013bb: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity