<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:16:18 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-1402] cfs_alloc_flags_to_gfp should translate CFS_ALLOC_HIGH to __GFP_HIGHMEM instead of __GFP_HIGH</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1402</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;According to the comment above CFS_ALLOC_HIGH, the flag allows allocator to return memory in the highmen zone:&lt;br/&gt;
/* allow to return page beyond KVM. It has to be mapped into KVM by&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;cfs_page_map(); */&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;p&gt;But cfs_alloc_flags_to_gfp() converts it to __GFP_HIGH, which according to kernel header:&lt;br/&gt;
#define __GFP_HIGH      0x20    /* Should access emergency pools? */&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think __GFP_HIGHMEM should be used instead. Also it makes sense to rename CFS_ALLOC_HIGH to CFS_ALLOC_HIGHMEM to avoid further confusion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="14421">LU-1402</key>
            <summary>cfs_alloc_flags_to_gfp should translate CFS_ALLOC_HIGH to __GFP_HIGHMEM instead of __GFP_HIGH</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="di.wang">Di Wang</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="isaac">Isaac Huang</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:40:57 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:39:34 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:31:53 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.3.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>1</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="38767" author="isaac" created="Mon, 14 May 2012 16:26:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fix pushed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/2732&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/2732&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="38790" author="liang" created="Mon, 14 May 2012 21:14:01 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Isaac, there is a patch which can totally clean up our allocators: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2523&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2523&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
it will be landed to 2.3 after review and test&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;we probably don&apos;t need a separate patch to reduce code conflict? I guess it&apos;s not a critical bug because __GFP_HIGHMEM don&apos;t have too many use cases in Lustre and most are in obdecho,&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="40336" author="pjones" created="Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:31:53 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="14885">LU-1513</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                    <customfield id="customfield_10020" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:float">
                        <customfieldname>Bugzilla ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>22135.0</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzv6jz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>4596</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>