<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 03:11:08 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-14598] Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;During testing, job failure was observed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;V-1: Entering mdtest_stat...
12/01/2020 04:46:28: Process 30(nid00514): FAILED in mdtest_stat, unable to stat file: No such file or directory
Rank 30 [Tue Dec  1 04:46:28 2020] [c0-1c2s0n2] application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 1) - process 30
12/01/2020 04:46:29: Process 3(nid00514): FAILED in mdtest_stat, unable to stat file: No such file or directory
Rank 3 [Tue Dec  1 04:46:29 2020] [c0-1c2s0n2] application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 1) - process 3
_pmiu_daemon(SIGCHLD): [NID 00514] [c0-1c2s0n2] [Tue Dec  1 04:46:29 2020] PE RANK 3 exit signal Aborted
[NID 00514] 2020-12-01 04:46:29 Apid 7421368: initiated application termination
Application 7421368 exit codes: 134
Application 7421368 resources: utime ~0s, stime ~8s, Rss ~9528, inblocks ~0, outblocks ~0
Job Script: command stopped at Tue Dec 1 04:46:36 CST 2020
Job Script: command runtime was 240 seconds
drwxr-xr-x 3 vers tsttool 4096 Dec  1 04:42 /lus/snx11281/ostest.vers/alsorun.20201130141403.23327.saturn-p4/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo.6.cdR49p.1606819353/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo
ls: cannot access &apos;/lus/snx11281/ostest.vers/alsorun.20201130141403.23327.saturn-p4/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo.6.cdR49p.1606819353/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo/#test-dir.0/mdtest_tree.0.0/file.mdtest.0.5023&apos;: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access &apos;/lus/snx11281/ostest.vers/alsorun.20201130141403.23327.saturn-p4/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo.6.cdR49p.1606819353/CL_mdtest_pfl_1s_fo/#test-dir.0/mdtest_tree.0.0/file.mdtest.0.4854&apos;: No such file or directory
...
Dec  1 04:45:12 snx11281n002 kernel: Lustre: 15664:0:(client.c:2188:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request sent has timed out for slow reply: [sent 1606819417/real 1606819417]  req@ffff94b0eb7d9680 x1684868787957760/t0(0) o5-&amp;gt;snx11281-OST0001-osc-MDT0000@10.10.100.6@o2ib3:28/4 lens 432/432 e 0 to 1 dl 1606819512 ref 2 fl Rpc:XN/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1 job:&apos;&apos;
Dec  1 04:45:12 snx11281n002 kernel: Lustre: snx11281-OST0001-osc-MDT0000: Connection to snx11281-OST0001 (at 10.10.100.6@o2ib3) was lost; in progress operations using this service will wait for recovery to complete
Dec  1 04:45:12 snx11281n002 kernel: LustreError: 15664:0:(osp_precreate.c:687:osp_precreate_send()) snx11281-OST0001-osc-MDT0000: can&apos;t precreate: rc = -11
Dec  1 04:45:12 snx11281n002 kernel: LustreError: 15664:0:(osp_precreate.c:1358:osp_precreate_thread()) snx11281-OST0001-osc-MDT0000: cannot precreate objects: rc = -11
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With a debug patch we have catch vmcore with additional info.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[ 1401.294579] Lustre: format at ofd_dev.c:1651:ofd_create_hdl doesn&apos;t end in newline
[ 1401.294587] Lustre: snx11281-OST0004: Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced or reformatted: LFSCK will clean up
[ 1401.294587] LustreError: 19714:0:(ofd_dev.c:1665:ofd_create_hdl()) ASSERTION( diff &amp;lt;= 5 * OST_MAX_PRECREATE ) failed: snx11281-OST0004: precreate FID 0x0:4395085801 is over 100000 larger than the LAST_ID 0x0:4294967297 diff 100118504
[ 1401.294589] LustreError: 19714:0:(ofd_dev.c:1665:ofd_create_hdl()) LBUG
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is a root cause.&lt;br/&gt;
ofd_preprw_write() uses a wrong logic for getting sequence from a fid.&lt;br/&gt;
During recovery ofd_preprw_write took a wrong sequence 0x100040001 from fid, and loaded it for ofd device. After that OST got creation request from MDT0, ofd_create_hdl found loaded IDIF sequence and used it. Since sequence was a new it has a large oid difference with MDT0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="63719">LU-14598</key>
            <summary>Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="aboyko">Alexander Boyko</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="aboyko">Alexander Boyko</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>patch</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:55:11 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:04:08 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:04:39 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.14.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.12.6</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.15.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.12.8</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.15.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="298353" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:05:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Alexander Boyko (alexander.boyko@hpe.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/43248&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/43248&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: fix for IDIF sequence at ofd_preprw_write&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1b0024d41bd648b3ae63d85ba8b689eff85355d3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="298727" author="adilger" created="Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:29:31 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Looking at this, I&apos;m trying to understand the details correctly. The &quot;IDIF&quot; sequence actually has 2^48 OIDs for each OST, so the code should not be interpreting &quot;seq&quot; 0x100040001 as a different sequence number from 0x100040000, but rather the high 16-bit value = 0x0001 of the OID for OST0004.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="298734" author="aboyko" created="Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:33:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;@Andreas Dilger, yes, the right sequence should be used - 0x100040000 instead of&#160;0x100040001. I&apos;m adding a bit more info from vmcore/debugfs. It shows that a new sequence was loaded at ofd and new LAST_ID was created.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At vmcore OST0004 has the next loaded sequences. And it shows a freshly allocated file/sequence with oid 1 for MDT0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;crash&amp;gt; list ofd_seq.os_list -s ofd_seq.os_oi,os_lastid_obj -H ffffa13a6823f630 -x
ffffa143f47e5e80
  os_oi = {
    {
      oi = {
        oi_id = 0x400000400,
        oi_seq = 0xd6b439bb
      },
      oi_fid = {
        f_seq = 0x400000400,
        f_oid = 0xd6b439bb,
        f_ver = 0x0
      }
    }
  }
  os_lastid_obj = 0xffffa13d3808ce00
ffffa139ff995480
  os_oi = {
    {
      oi = {
        oi_id = 0x100040001,
        oi_seq = 0x1
      },
      oi_fid = {
        f_seq = 0x100040001,
        f_oid = 0x1,
        f_ver = 0x0
      }
    }
  }
  os_lastid_obj = 0xffffa13da8c5b700
crash&amp;gt; osd_object 0xffffa13da8c5b700
struct osd_object {
  oo_dt = {
    do_lu = {
      lo_header = 0xffffa13d4ca06d20,
      lo_dev = 0xffffa13db9aa5000,
      lo_ops = 0xffffffffc1f3b100 &amp;lt;osd_lu_obj_ops&amp;gt;,
      lo_linkage = {
        next = 0xffffa13d4ca06d60,
        prev = 0xffffa13d4ca06d88
      },
      lo_dev_ref = {&amp;lt;No data fields&amp;gt;}
    },
    do_ops = 0xffffffffc1f3b000 &amp;lt;osd_obj_ops&amp;gt;,
    do_body_ops = 0xffffffffc1f3cf40 &amp;lt;osd_body_ops&amp;gt;,
    do_index_ops = 0x0
  },
  oo_inode = 0xffffa13eae1bedc8,
....
crash&amp;gt; inode 0xffffa13eae1bedc8
struct inode {
  i_mode = 33188,
  i_opflags = 0,
  i_uid = {
    val = 0
  },
  i_gid = {
    val = 0
  },
  i_flags = 128,
  i_acl = 0xffffffffffffffff,
  i_default_acl = 0xffffffffffffffff,
  i_op = 0xffffffffc24b5b40 &amp;lt;ldiskfs_file_inode_operations&amp;gt;,
  i_sb = 0xffffa13f77734000,
  i_mapping = 0xffffa13eae1bef18,
  i_security = 0x0,
  i_ino = 426717,
 &lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The creation time of inode 426717 is exact crash time. The sequence loaded at ofd was a new one and LAST_ID was created for it, instead of O/0/LAST_ID.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;# debugfs /dev/md0
debugfs 1.45.6.cr1 (14-Aug-2020)
debugfs:  stat &amp;lt;426717&amp;gt;
Inode: 426717   Type: regular    Mode:  0644   Flags: 0x84000
Generation: 1901991170    Version: 0x00000000:00000000
User:     0   Group:     0   Project:     0   Size: 8
File ACL: 0
Links: 1   Blockcount: 8
Fragment:  Address: 0    Number: 0    Size: 0
 ctime: 0x605a7ccc:a3bdb8b8 -- Tue Mar 23 18:42:04 2021
 atime: 0x605a7ccc:a3bdb8b8 -- Tue Mar 23 18:42:04 2021
 mtime: 0x605a7ccc:a3bdb8b8 -- Tue Mar 23 18:42:04 2021
crtime: 0x605a7ccc:a3bdb8b8 -- Tue Mar 23 18:42:04 2021
Size of extra inode fields: 32
Extended attributes:
  trusted.lma (24) = 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 04 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  lma: fid=[0x100040001:0x0:0x0] compat=8 incompat=0
EXTENTS:
(0):1193148674
debugfs:  stat O/0/LAST_ID
Inode: 96   Type: regular    Mode:  0644   Flags: 0x84000
Generation: 132363868    Version: 0x00000000:00000000
User:     0   Group:     0   Project:     0   Size: 8
File ACL: 0
Links: 1   Blockcount: 8
Fragment:  Address: 0    Number: 0    Size: 0
 ctime: 0x5e9f512f:d323ef10 -- Tue Apr 21 15:01:51 2020
 atime: 0x5d016f96:3b027e8c -- Wed Jun 12 16:33:10 2019
 mtime: 0x5d016f96:3b027e8c -- Wed Jun 12 16:33:10 2019
crtime: 0x5d016f96:3b027e8c -- Wed Jun 12 16:33:10 2019
Size of extra inode fields: 32
Extended attributes:
  trusted.lma (24) = 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 
  lma: fid=[0x100040000:0x0:0x0] compat=8 incompat=0
EXTENTS:
(0):36993
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="298737" author="aboyko" created="Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:44:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Related to this issue, I see one more problem,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ofd_preprw_write() has a loop for creation of missing objects, without limits with 100k like osp has. It could hang a recovery with a small numbers, and break recovery when millions object should be created. May be it is better to return old logic, when a single object is created for this write IO?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="299883" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 28 Apr 2021 02:10:22 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/43248/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/43248/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: fix for IDIF sequence at ofd_preprw_write&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 747fed818be5a4e09281ab1d9fd5b3a13763ab40&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="299917" author="pjones" created="Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:04:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.15&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="300482" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 4 May 2021 21:08:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Etienne AUJAMES (eaujames@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/43541&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/43541&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: fix for IDIF sequence at ofd_preprw_write&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_12&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: f9b834eaf9d8706accd9b45f2c5670b8b908c596&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="318217" author="gerrit" created="Sun, 14 Nov 2021 05:51:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/43541/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/43541/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: fix for IDIF sequence at ofd_preprw_write&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_12&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 4a0290c6be47e3ecd8108f78961afb2e54d6fddf&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="358337" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:31:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Andreas Dilger &amp;lt;adilger@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49583&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49583&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip conf-sanity test_122b in interop&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 8e15572e836a75bd52e6d249b59b76f340b97de3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="358422" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:07:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Andreas Dilger &amp;lt;adilger@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49586&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49586&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip conf-sanity test_122b in interop&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_15&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 988f86ee62c39488e47dfad7392f43e7fad02d17&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="359665" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:28:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49583/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49583/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip conf-sanity test_122b in interop&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: a9f83af896f2ce20e9ee430ad371b707c0c140cc&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="368970" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:04:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49586/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/49586/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14598&quot; title=&quot;Too many FIDs to precreate OST replaced. Wrong IDIF logic.&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14598&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14598&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip conf-sanity test_122b in interop&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_15&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 22d3efff0df2365812ce23ea22c79ce13f9379ab&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="46265">LU-9547</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="64003">LU-14658</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="73898">LU-16456</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i01rr3:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>