<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:16:59 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-1479] SRP module enabled by lbuild</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1479</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;currently, srp initiator and target modules are disabled by lbuild when it builds kernel-ib RPM.&lt;br/&gt;
What&apos;s reason of disabling this module? We don&apos;t need SRP target module, but want to include SRP initiator module in kernel-ib.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="14741">LU-1479</key>
            <summary>SRP module enabled by lbuild</summary>
                <type id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11310&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Improvement</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="mdiep">Minh Diep</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="ihara">Shuichi Ihara</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:16:08 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:35:07 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:28:06 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.2.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.3.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.1.4</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="40028" author="brian" created="Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:27:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;IIRC, we were advised by upstream (i.e. OFA) that we should be using the iscsi provided by the kernel when we found problems building various parts of the OFED stack.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.openfabrics.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1764&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://bugs.openfabrics.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1764&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="40128" author="ihara" created="Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:14:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;That information seems to be a little bit old. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3049&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3049&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve tested lbuild with &quot;--with-srp-mod&quot; to latest OFED (OFED-1.5.4.1) on RHEL5.7 and RHEL6.2&apos;s kernel with master branch and compiling of kernel-ib was no problem.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="40342" author="apittman" created="Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:23:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;When using external OFED it is not possible to use the inkernel srp module, we currently patch lbuild to build srp as part of the OFED build.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="44045" author="pjones" created="Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:28:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.3&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="44992" author="furlongm" created="Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:24:04 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Is there any chance of this being backported to the 2.1 branch? Currently can&apos;t use SRP on the 2.1 branch using the whamcloud built rpms:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ib_srp: disagrees about version of symbol ib_unregister_client&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_unregister_client&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_wq&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: disagrees about version of symbol ib_fmr_pool_unmap&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_fmr_pool_unmap&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: disagrees about version of symbol ib_create_cq&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_create_cq&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: disagrees about version of symbol ib_create_fmr_pool&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_create_fmr_pool&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: disagrees about version of symbol ib_dereg_mr&lt;br/&gt;
ib_srp: Unknown symbol ib_dereg_mr&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzv6fj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>4576</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>