<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 03:12:59 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-14810] sanity-lnet test_212: lnet_assert_handler_unused() ASSERTION(md-&gt;md_handler != handler) failed</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14810</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;This issue was created by maloo for Andreas Dilger &amp;lt;adilger@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue relates to the following test suite run: &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/84ed5e32-bda8-4880-a254-dbd96cb6a478&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/84ed5e32-bda8-4880-a254-dbd96cb6a478&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;test_212 failed with the following error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;trevis-79vm3 crashed during sanity-lnet test_212

LNetError: 944562:0:(lib-md.c:288:lnet_assert_handler_unused()) ASSERTION( md-&amp;gt;md_handler != handler ) failed: 
Pid: 944562, comm: lnet_discovery 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.aarch64 #1 SMP Thu Apr 8 19:01:45 UTC 2021
Call Trace:
 libcfs_call_trace+0xb8/0x118 [libcfs]
 lbug_with_loc+0x60/0xa0 [libcfs]
 lnet_assert_handler_unused+0xb8/0xe0 [lnet]
 lnet_peer_discovery+0x16c4/0x1cb0 [lnet]
 kthread+0x130/0x138
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This test was recently landed via patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/43418&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/43418&lt;/a&gt; &quot;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14627&quot; title=&quot;Lost ref on lnet_peer in discovery leads to LNetError: 24909:0:(peer.c:292:lnet_destroy_peer_locked()) ASSERTION( list_empty(&amp;amp;lp-&amp;gt;lp_peer_nets) ) failed:&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14627&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-14627&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: Ensure ref taken when queueing for discovery&lt;/tt&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;





&lt;p&gt;VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV&lt;br/&gt;
sanity-lnet test_212 - trevis-79vm3 crashed during sanity-lnet test_212&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="64974">LU-14810</key>
            <summary>sanity-lnet test_212: lnet_assert_handler_unused() ASSERTION(md-&gt;md_handler != handler) failed</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/reopened.png" description="This issue was once resolved, but the resolution was deemed incorrect. From here issues are either marked assigned or resolved.">Reopened</status>
                    <statusCategory id="2" key="new" colorName="default"/>
                                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="cbordage">Cyril Bordage</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="maloo">Maloo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Sat, 3 Jul 2021 00:29:08 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:06:06 +0000</updated>
                                                            <fixVersion>Lustre 2.16.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>10</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="306158" author="adilger" created="Sat, 3 Jul 2021 00:32:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Chris, could you please take a look at this.  I just hit this failure in a functionally no-op patch, and since this test was just added by your patch it is possibly related to that.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="306969" author="hornc" created="Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:35:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=adilger&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;adilger&quot;&gt;adilger&lt;/a&gt; is there a vmcore available?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="307095" author="adilger" created="Tue, 13 Jul 2021 08:41:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Chris, we used to collect crash dumps, but I don&apos;t see them linked from the &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/84ed5e32-bda8-4880-a254-dbd96cb6a478&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;Maloo test page&lt;/a&gt; for the crash.  There is a console log attached for the failed server.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It should also be noted that this failure is with &lt;tt&gt;review-ldiskfs-arm&lt;/tt&gt; (i.e. ARM client), so that may be of interest.  It is running in little-endian mode, but will have 64KB PAGE_SIZE.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="339506" author="lixi_wc" created="Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:42:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Might got another one on master, but no log saved:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/83dcfa5f-0848-43aa-8278-a7eb263bdd11&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/83dcfa5f-0848-43aa-8278-a7eb263bdd11&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="364266" author="adilger" created="Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:26:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master: &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b44670dd-ae14-4cdc-afdf-083de5b4ebc5&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b44670dd-ae14-4cdc-afdf-083de5b4ebc5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="367787" author="adilger" created="Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:46:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master + Ubuntu 22.04:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/1a78e4ac-57d1-4905-97df-bf186dc0c619&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/1a78e4ac-57d1-4905-97df-bf186dc0c619&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="368226" author="hornc" created="Mon, 3 Apr 2023 18:51:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The issue is a race between callers of lnet_ping_target_setup() and lnet_ping_target_fini(). I&apos;m not sure how to resolve it yet.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="393577" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 20 Nov 2023 06:53:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/bf0e171e-4549-4d8e-b437-1ac07124c4a0&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/bf0e171e-4549-4d8e-b437-1ac07124c4a0&lt;/a&gt; on master&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="394287" author="eaujames" created="Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:12:17 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Same stack on &quot;sanity-lnet test_220&quot;:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/245f2ca0-247a-4f4b-989a-807f4642547e&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/245f2ca0-247a-4f4b-989a-807f4642547e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[17408.323111] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark == sanity-lnet test 220: Add routes w\/default options - check aliveness ========================================================== 22:18:00 \(1700864280\)
[17408.530260] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-lnet test 220: Add routes w/default options - check aliveness ========================================================== 22:18:00 (1700864280)
[17408.806233] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lustre_rmmod
[17409.412889] Key type lgssc unregistered
[17409.479271] LNetError: 9972:0:(lib-md.c:281:lnet_assert_handler_unused()) ASSERTION( md-&amp;gt;md_handler != handler ) failed: 
[17409.481545] LNetError: 9972:0:(lib-md.c:281:lnet_assert_handler_unused()) LBUG
[17409.482950] Pid: 9972, comm: lnet_discovery 4.18.0-477.27.1.el8_lustre.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 8 23:01:53 UTC 2023
[17409.484866] Call Trace TBD:
[17409.485593] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] libcfs_call_trace+0x63/0x90 [libcfs]
[17409.486676] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x3f/0x70 [libcfs]
[17409.487633] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] lnet_assert_handler_unused+0xa0/0xd0 [lnet]
[17409.488896] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] lnet_peer_discovery+0x14fb/0x1730 [lnet]
[17409.489990] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] kthread+0x134/0x150
[17409.490785] [&amp;lt;0&amp;gt;] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[17409.491622] Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
[17409.492461] CPU: 1 PID: 9972 Comm: lnet_discovery Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W  OE    --------- -  - 4.18.0-477.27.1.el8_lustre.x86_64 #1
[17409.494792] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
[17409.495890] Call Trace:
[17409.496425]  dump_stack+0x41/0x60
[17409.497114]  panic+0xe7/0x2ac
[17409.497751]  ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[17409.498494]  ? lnet_discovery_event_reply+0xb00/0xb00 [lnet]
[17409.499605]  lbug_with_loc.cold.8+0x18/0x18 [libcfs]
[17409.500571]  lnet_assert_handler_unused+0xa0/0xd0 [lnet]
[17409.501620]  lnet_peer_discovery+0x14fb/0x1730 [lnet]
[17409.502616]  ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[17409.503343]  ? lnet_peer_merge_data+0x1110/0x1110 [lnet]
[17409.504385]  kthread+0x134/0x150
[17409.505042]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
[17409.505862]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="394845" author="adilger" created="Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:09:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Cyril, are you able to look into this issue?  It seems that we are still hitting this quite a bit in testing.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="395712" author="hornc" created="Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:14:15 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue is a race between callers of lnet_ping_target_setup() and lnet_ping_target_fini(). I&apos;m not sure how to resolve it yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think there may be two similar bugs. I did not keep my notes that lead me to this conclusion ^, but I recently hit the assert on the discovery shutdown path while running sanity-lnet test 500.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Discovery thread sends PUSH to some peer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.819250:0:30012:0:(peer.c:3958:lnet_peer_discovery_wait_for_work()) woken: 0
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.819251:0:30012:0:(peer.c:4070:lnet_peer_discovery()) peer 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp(ffff975bb6c4aa00) state 0x151
00000400:00000010:0.0:1701811372.819252:0:30012:0:(lib-md.c:152:lnet_md_build()) slab-alloced &apos;lmd&apos;: 136 at ffff975bec10ed48.
...
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.819277:0:30012:0:(net_fault.c:582:delay_rule_match()) Delay Rule 255.255.255.255@tcp-&amp;gt;255.255.255.255@tcp: next delay: 1
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.819279:0:30012:0:(peer.c:3892:lnet_peer_send_push()) peer 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.819280:0:30012:0:(peer.c:4092:lnet_peer_discovery()) peer 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp(ffff975bb6c4aa00) state 0x551 rc 0
...
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.892780:0:30459:0:(net_fault.c:692:delayed_msg_process()) TRACE: msg ffff975bee9ba210 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp -&amp;gt; 10.1.2.3@tcp : PUT
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;p&gt;The PUSH send fails:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;00000400:02020000:0.0:1701811372.892824:0:30074:0:(acceptor.c:130:lnet_connect_console_error()) 11e-e: Unexpected error -2 connecting to 10.1.2.3@tcp at host 10.1.2.3:988
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902763:0:30074:0:(router.c:1693:lnet_notify()) 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp notifying 10.1.2.3@tcp: down
00000800:00000100:0.0:1701811372.902767:0:30074:0:(socklnd_cb.c:430:ksocknal_txlist_done()) Deleting packet type 1 len 72 0@&amp;lt;0:0&amp;gt;-&amp;gt;10.1.2.3@tcp
00000800:00000010:0.0:1701811372.902768:0:30074:0:(socklnd_cb.c:110:ksocknal_free_tx()) kfreed &apos;tx&apos;: 248 at ffff975bb6816b00.
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902769:0:30074:0:(lib-msg.c:1046:lnet_is_health_check()) health check = 1, status = -2, hstatus = 5
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902772:0:30074:0:(lib-msg.c:819:lnet_health_check()) health check: 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp-&amp;gt;10.1.2.3@tcp: PUT: LOCAL_ERROR
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The peer is placed back on discovery request queue by the event handler, and then discovery thread is stopped:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902777:0:30074:0:(peer.c:3061:lnet_discovery_event_handler()) Received event: 5
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902778:0:30074:0:(peer.c:3013:lnet_discovery_event_send()) Push Send to 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp: 1
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902779:0:30074:0:(peer.c:2385:lnet_peer_queue_for_discovery()) Queue peer 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp: -114

00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902814:0:30012:0:(peer.c:3958:lnet_peer_discovery_wait_for_work()) woken: -108
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902814:0:30012:0:(peer.c:4117:lnet_peer_discovery()) stopping
00000400:00000200:0.0:1701811372.902815:0:30012:0:(peer.c:2401:lnet_peer_discovery_complete()) Discovery complete. Dequeue peer 2601:8c1:c180:2000::cbdd@tcp
00000400:00040000:0.0:1701811372.902817:0:30012:0:(lib-md.c:281:lnet_assert_handler_unused()) ASSERTION( md-&amp;gt;md_handler != handler ) failed:
00000400:00040000:0.0:1701811372.912358:0:30012:0:(lib-md.c:281:lnet_assert_handler_unused()) LBUG
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Normally, the discovery thread would call lnet_peer_push_failed() to unlink the MD (it is not auto-unlinked because the PUT expects an ACK, so md_threshold is still &amp;gt; 0). But because discovery thread is shutdown this is missed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="395750" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 6 Dec 2023 20:08:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Chris Horn &amp;lt;chris.horn@hpe.com&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/53356&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/53356&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14810&quot; title=&quot;sanity-lnet test_212: lnet_assert_handler_unused() ASSERTION(md-&amp;gt;md_handler != handler) failed&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14810&quot;&gt;LU-14810&lt;/a&gt; lnet: Cancel discovery ping/push on shutdown&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 51edce5d56125ca03763415fa52ec94f621468bc&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="395755" author="hornc" created="Wed, 6 Dec 2023 20:19:22 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I pushed a patch to fix the discovery issue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is a recent example of the other bug I referenced - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a5b72565-cf36-421a-be50-00d8b275d740&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a5b72565-cf36-421a-be50-00d8b275d740&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="397531" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2023 01:44:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/53356/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/53356/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-14810&quot; title=&quot;sanity-lnet test_212: lnet_assert_handler_unused() ASSERTION(md-&amp;gt;md_handler != handler) failed&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-14810&quot;&gt;LU-14810&lt;/a&gt; lnet: Cancel discovery ping/push on shutdown&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: c3b9597742d5118a96f56129e7dd30d84468d2c8&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="397562" author="pjones" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2023 02:32:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.16&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="397685" author="hornc" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:04:09 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The patch that landed only fixes one of the two bugs that result in tripping the assert.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reopening.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="398692" author="adilger" created="Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:48:37 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master: &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/121f699a-8b7c-40dc-be4e-99f534b874b4&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/121f699a-8b7c-40dc-be4e-99f534b874b4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="63863">LU-14627</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="57449">LU-13005</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="79154">LU-17313</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i01yfz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>