<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 03:24:03 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-16106] lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16106</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;When starting lnet, we observe NIs going down after about 110 sec. The nodes that we&apos;ve observed this issue in are router nodes. We setting are setting check_routers_before_use=1 in out lnet module parameters. We do not see this issue with check_routers_before_use=0.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The network is&lt;br/&gt;
o2ib18 &amp;lt;&lt;del&gt;{&lt;/del&gt;}&amp;gt; tcp129 &amp;lt;{&lt;del&gt;}&lt;/del&gt;&amp;gt; o2ib100&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The routers of interest are opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187-190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,188&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; route between o2ib18 and tcp129&lt;br/&gt;
opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;189,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; route between tcp129 and o2ib100&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;o2ib100 includes many non-opal nodes, including LNet routers and MDS and OSS nodes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The issue was first observed on the tcp network. However, stopping lnet on all nodes in o2ib18 then starting it on opal187 showed the same symptoms on the infiniband NI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When the NI status was down, traffic was unable to flow between compute nodes on o2ib18 and a filesystem on o2ib100. Also, pings don&apos;t work between nodes with down NIs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, when starting some nodes opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; with check_routers_before_use not set, then starting opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; with check_routers_before_use=1, opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; are able to ping and be pinged by opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;, but can&apos;t ping each other or themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We noticed this when booting the opal cluster. All the non-opal nodes on o2ib100 were up and LNet was running on those non-opal nodes. The opal router nodes listed above were powered on first, and after they were up and LNet was started, the rest of the opal nodes (about 60 lustre clients) were booted. We found that the opal routers NIs were down and the opal clients could not ping through the opal routers to the MDS and OSS nodes on o2ib100. This is a concern because this scenario occurs when we update operating system versions or recover from power outages.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>lustre-2.15.0_3.llnl-3.t4.x86_64&lt;br/&gt;
TOSS 4.4-5</environment>
        <key id="71975">LU-16106</key>
            <summary>lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="ssmirnov">Serguei Smirnov</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="defazio">Gian-Carlo Defazio</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>llnl</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:34:45 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 5 Apr 2023 20:09:32 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Sat, 17 Sep 2022 13:01:56 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.15.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.16.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.15.2</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="344591" author="defazio" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:39:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The nodes seem to have differing opinions about up/down&lt;br/&gt;
In this case opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; were stared with check_routers_before_use not set&lt;br/&gt;
opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; started with check_routers_before_use=1&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[root@opal193:~]# pdsh -w eopal[187-190] &apos;lnetctl peer show --verbose | grep -E -A 1 &quot;\- nid.*tcp129&quot;&apos; | dshbak -c
----------------
eopal187
----------------
        - nid: 192.168.129.188@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.190@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.189@tcp129
          state: down
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.187@tcp129
          state: down
----------------
eopal188
----------------
        - nid: 192.168.129.190@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.188@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.189@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.187@tcp129
          state: up
----------------
eopal189
----------------
        - nid: 192.168.129.190@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.188@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.187@tcp129
          state: down
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.189@tcp129
          state: down
----------------
eopal190
----------------
        - nid: 192.168.129.188@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.190@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.187@tcp129
          state: up
--
        - nid: 192.168.129.189@tcp129
          state: up

&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="344592" author="defazio" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:44:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve uploaded &lt;em&gt;startup_router_nodes_systemctl.gz&lt;/em&gt; which shows starting lnet via systemctl for opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187-190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;. All 4 routers have check_routers_before_use=1. debug=+net.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344593" author="ofaaland" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:45:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;For our reference, our local issue is TOSS5754&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344594" author="defazio" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:54:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Here&apos;s the module params we set for lnet on opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,188&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;options lnet forwarding=&quot;enabled&quot; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;networks=&quot;o2ib18(hsi0),tcp129(lnet0)&quot; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;routes=&quot;o2ib600 &#160;192.168.129.[189-190]@tcp129; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;tcp0 &#160; &#160; 192.168.129.[189-190]@tcp129; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;o2ib100 &#160;192.168.129.[189-190]@tcp129&quot;
options lnet lnet_peer_discovery_disabled=1
# Common to lustre 2.8, lustre 2.10, lustre 2.12
options libcfs libcfs_panic_on_lbug=1
options libcfs libcfs_debug=0x3060580
options ptlrpc at_min=45
options ptlrpc at_max=600
options ksocklnd keepalive_count=100
options ksocklnd keepalive_idle=30
options lnet check_routers_before_use=1
options lnet lnet_health_sensitivity=0# lustre 2.12 default for keepalive_intvl is 5 (secs)
# lustre 2.12 default for avoid_asym_router_failure is 1 (enabled)
# Below settings are set via module options ONLY for Lustre &amp;lt;= 2.10
# For later versions of Lustre, they are set via lnetctl YAML files.
options lnet forwarding=&quot;enabled&quot;
options lnet tiny_router_buffers=2048
options lnet small_router_buffers=16384
options lnet large_router_buffers=2048
options ko2iblnd credits=1024
options ksocklnd credits=512
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and for opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;189,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; only the nets and routes differ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;options lnet forwarding=&quot;enabled&quot; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;networks=&quot;o2ib100(san0),tcp129(lnet0)&quot; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;routes=&quot;o2ib600 &#160;172.19.2.[22-25]@o2ib100; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;tcp0 &#160; &#160; 172.19.2.[22-25]@o2ib100; \
&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;o2ib18 &#160; 192.168.129.[187-188]@tcp129&quot;
options lnet lnet_peer_discovery_disabled=1
# Common to lustre 2.8, lustre 2.10, lustre 2.12
options libcfs libcfs_panic_on_lbug=1
options libcfs libcfs_debug=0x3060580
options ptlrpc at_min=45
options ptlrpc at_max=600
options ksocklnd keepalive_count=100
options ksocklnd keepalive_idle=30
#options lnet check_routers_before_use=1
options lnet lnet_health_sensitivity=0# lustre 2.12 default for keepalive_intvl is 5 (secs)
# lustre 2.12 default for avoid_asym_router_failure is 1 (enabled)
# Below settings are set via module options ONLY for Lustre &amp;lt;= 2.10
# For later versions of Lustre, they are set via lnetctl YAML files.
options lnet forwarding=&quot;enabled&quot;
options lnet tiny_router_buffers=2048
options lnet small_router_buffers=16384
options lnet large_router_buffers=2048
options ko2iblnd credits=1024
options ksocklnd credits=512
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344595" author="ofaaland" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:58:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;In the above description of the module parameters, the &quot;# Below settings are set  via module options ONLY for Lustre &amp;lt;= 2.10 ...&quot; is not correct, we set all that via modprobe.d files.    The embedded comment is outdated and never got cleaned up.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344632" author="pjones" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:54:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Serguei&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can you please advise&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344683" author="ssmirnov" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 18:20:25 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are there actually any differences between module parameters for opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; vs. &lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You mention that &quot;the nets and routes differ&quot;, but I don&apos;t see that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, could you please clarify which version of lustre is used?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;
lctl --version &lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Serguei.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344687" author="defazio" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:21:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;@ssmirnov&#160; I had the router numbers wrong. I&apos;ve updated them in the description and where I posted the module parameters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The the correct groupings are:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,188&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; are routers between o2ib18 and tcp129&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;189,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; are routers between o2ib100 and tcp129&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I set check_routers_before_use=0 for one router in each group for testing purposes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; have check_routers_before_use=0 (and can ping, have NIs up)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; have check_routers_before_use=1 (NIs down, have pinging issues)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;~# lctl --version
lctl 2.15.0_3.llnl&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344758" author="eaujames" created="Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:55:36 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br/&gt;
Your route for opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; should be: &quot;o2ib100  192.168.129.&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;@tcp129&quot;&lt;br/&gt;
And for opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;188,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;: &quot;o2ib18  192.168.129.&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,189&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt;@tcp129&quot;&lt;br/&gt;
And you don&apos;t need the route for tcp0 and o2ib600 because you don&apos;t have the interfaces on opal&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;187,190&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; for these networks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am missing something?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;check_routers_before_use=1 considers all routers peers and routes as down when starting (&quot;=0&quot; -&amp;gt; considers as up). To use a route, a ping (discovery ping on 2.15) have to success.&lt;br/&gt;
My guess (not verified) is that the router peer stay down if no correct network interface on the remote router is found.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can check the following lnet module parameters too:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;parm:           alive_router_check_interval:Seconds between live router health checks (&amp;lt;= 0 to disable)   &amp;lt;-- default 60s
parm:           router_ping_timeout:Seconds to wait for the reply to a router health query (int) &amp;lt;-- default 50s
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344759" author="eaujames" created="Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:14:33 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sorry for my comment above, I did not see your update.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344868" author="ssmirnov" created="Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:46:46 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Gian-Carlo,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could you please let me know how to get the source with &quot;2.15.0_3.llnl&quot; tag?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wasn&apos;t able to find this tag in LLNL Lustre repo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Serguei.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344869" author="defazio" created="Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:56:17 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Serguei,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, it wasn&apos;t pushed. It&apos;s on github now at &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LLNL/lustre/tree/2.15.0_3.llnl&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LLNL/lustre/tree/2.15.0_3.llnl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344896" author="defazio" created="Fri, 26 Aug 2022 21:53:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Serguei,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve seen the same issue now for our local lustre 2.14 and 2.12 when all other router nodes are down (or have lnet down) and a single node starts lnet. I need to collect more data on what combinations or nodes, startup orders, and module parameters cause the problem. I&apos;ll post that info early next week.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="344922" author="gerrit" created="Sun, 28 Aug 2022 01:58:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Serguei Smirnov &amp;lt;ssmirnov@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/48355&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/48355&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16106&quot; title=&quot;lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-16106&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-16106&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: ignore peer ni down status if it was never up&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 13e7664eef06d081366c7be2e8b43c186f70a429&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="345140" author="defazio" created="Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:02:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The patch seems to solve the issues we were having. Starting the routers in any order works now. This is with check_routers_before_use=1 of course. The routers can ping each other and compute nodes can get through to routers to the file system.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="346402" author="ofaaland" created="Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:43:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Gian,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have we tested with the final version of the patch (set 3)?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks,&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="346417" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 12 Sep 2022 20:59:37 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Gian-Carlo DeFazio &amp;lt;defazio1@llnl.gov&amp;gt;&quot; uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/48529&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/48529&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16106&quot; title=&quot;lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-16106&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-16106&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: allow direct messages regardless of peer NI status&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_15&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: d747b9c24b9c8366f0551a7b790aad30b3a80786&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="346425" author="defazio" created="Mon, 12 Sep 2022 22:48:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We have not tested patch set 3.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="347000" author="gerrit" created="Sat, 17 Sep 2022 06:23:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/48355/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/48355/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16106&quot; title=&quot;lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-16106&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-16106&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: allow direct messages regardless of peer NI status&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 3345a8a54e89c342a4ce2d8d4bcb04ee919bcd52&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="347020" author="pjones" created="Sat, 17 Sep 2022 13:01:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This fix has now landed for 2.16. We still need to track the port to b2_15 being merged and confirm that LLNL&apos;s testing is successful with the latest version&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="347918" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:57:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&quot;Oleg Drokin &amp;lt;green@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&quot; merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/48529/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/48529/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16106&quot; title=&quot;lnet network NIs go down when they have no peers and check_routers_before_use=1&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-16106&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-16106&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lnet: allow direct messages regardless of peer NI status&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_15&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 9ae1fc3e0e4507c242c5f379e6364ad270d865c0&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="347969" author="defazio" created="Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:26:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I tested patch set 3 and it looks good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the late notification, the testing resources with the correct setup for that test have been unavailable lately.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                            <attachment id="45396" name="startup_router_nodes_systemctl.gz" size="1329342" author="defazio" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:42:33 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|i02xtz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>