https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16395 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Minh Diep &lt;mdiep@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/44907b48-6f5c-466e-afa5-37c6c1e29571" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/44907b48-6f5c-466e-afa5-37c6c1e29571</a></p> LU-16395

obdfilter-survey: Error: 'Timeout occurred after 342 minutes, last suite running was obdfilter-survey'

Bug Minor Open Unresolved Jian Yu Maloo zfs Wed, 14 Dec 2022 04:43:02 +0000 Fri, 6 Jan 2023 02:03:06 +0000 Lustre 2.15.1 0 3 <p>Jian</p> <p>Could you please check to see whether this is indicative of a regression in 2.15.2?</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Hi Peter,<br/> It's not a regression in 2.15.2.</p> <p>The same failure occurred on:<br/> 2.15.0: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a17b3fbf-ece1-4554-9cb1-02f25578424e" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a17b3fbf-ece1-4554-9cb1-02f25578424e</a><br/> 2.15.1: <a href="https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ae959a93-3db7-47d4-94d5-126e8c65a13e" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ae959a93-3db7-47d4-94d5-126e8c65a13e</a></p> <p>All of the failure instances are in full-zfs-part-1 and full-dne-zfs-part-1 test sessions.<br/> The same test passed in full-part-1 and full-dne-part-1 test sessions with ldiskfs. </p> <p> </p> <p>The same test was removed from master branch by <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/47239" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/47239</a> ("<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10994" title="remove unused page layers" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-10994"><del>LU-10994</del></a> test: remove netdisk from obdfilter-survey").</p> <p>Ah very good - thanks. So it would probably make sense to port that same patch to b2_15 to reduce test noise?</p> <p>Yes, Peter, there are 13 patches for that ticket. I'm looking at them to see if I can just port #47239.</p> <p>Here is the back-ported patch for b2_15 branch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/49413" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/49413</a></p> Related LU-10872 LU-10994 Development Rank 1|i037xj: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity