https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1765 Lustre <p>Sanger has hit an LBUG on its clients:<br/> ASSERTION(atomic_read(&amp;import-&gt;imp_refcount) &lt; 0x5a5a5a) failed </p> <p>This appears to be a dupe of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-919" title="Multiple wrong LBUGs checking cfs_atomic_t vars/fields with inacurate poison value of 0x5a5a5a" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-919"><del>LU-919</del></a>, but that patch was never landed on b1_8, though the patch was created. Is there any chance to get it landed? It failed the maloo test, but it doesn't look like that failure was investigated:<br/> <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1954" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1954</a></p> LU-1765

client LBUGs with ASSERTION(atomic_read(&import->imp_refcount) < 0x5a5a5a) failed

Bug Minor Resolved Duplicate Niu Yawei Kit Westneat Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:33:46 +0000 Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:24:32 +0000 Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:24:32 +0000 Lustre 1.8.8 0 2 <p>Niu</p> <p>Could you please confirm whether this issue would indeed be addressed by your earlier patch and if so rebase it to see how it fares on autotest with the latest code.</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Link this to <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-919" title="Multiple wrong LBUGs checking cfs_atomic_t vars/fields with inacurate poison value of 0x5a5a5a" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-919"><del>LU-919</del></a>.</p> Duplicate LU-919 Development Rank 1|hzvgnz: Rank (Obsolete) 6349 Severity