https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2174 Lustre <p>I am trying to add sanity-quota.sh into my roster and it seems to be very unhappy running with a single node setup: with no lustre mounted beforehand:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>[root@centos6-9 tests]# SLOW=yes REFORMAT=yes sh sanity-quota.sh Logging to shared log directory: /tmp/test_logs/1350196677 error: lustre_build_version: No such file or directory opening /dev/lnet failed: No such device hint: the kernel modules may not be loaded IOC_LIBCFS_GET_NI error 19: No such device error: get_param: /proc/{fs,sys}/{lnet,lustre}/version: Found no match /home/green/git/lustre-release/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh: line 341: ( &lt;&lt; 16) | ( &lt;&lt; 8) | : syntax error: operand expected (error token is "&lt;&lt; 16) | ( &lt;&lt; 8) | ") sanity-quota.sh: line 44: [: -lt: unary operator expected </pre> </div></div> <p>I imagine lustre setup bit needs to be moved earlier into the code.</p> LU-2174

sanity-quota.sh breakage on single node setup

Bug Major Resolved Fixed Niu Yawei Oleg Drokin Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:46:37 +0000 Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:28:19 +0000 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:44:16 +0000 Lustre 2.4.0 Lustre 2.4.0 0 3 <p>Additionally instead of the standard RUNAS_ID, the script depends on the non-standard TSTID/TSTID2 variables:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>[root@centos6-9 tests]# SLOW=yes RUNAS_ID=500 sh sanity-quota.sh Logging to shared log directory: /tmp/test_logs/1350197276 debugfs 1.42.3.wc3 (15-Aug-2012) centos6-9.localnet: Checking config lustre mounted on /mnt/lustre Checking servers environments Checking clients centos6-9.localnet environments Using TIMEOUT=20 enable jobstats, set job scheduler as procname_uid excepting tests: running as uid/gid/euid/egid 60000/60000/60000/60000, groups: [touch] [/mnt/lustre/d0_runas_test/f9931] touch: cannot touch `/mnt/lustre/d0_runas_test/f9931': Permission denied sanity-quota : @@@@@@ FAIL: unable to write to /mnt/lustre/d0_runas_test as UID 60000. Please set RUNAS_ID to some UID which exists on MDS and client or add user 60000:60000 on these nodes. </pre> </div></div> <p>Oleg, I have a patch for the version checks that gets the Lustre version from lctl directly instead of depending on /proc. if the modules are loaded it uses the version from /proc, but otherwise uses the version compiled into lctl. </p> <p>Please give it a try. It works for me though Yu Jian reported a problem that I couldn't reproduce. </p> <p>where can I get the patch?</p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/4173" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/4173</a> "<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2024" title="sanity-scrub test was not run" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-2024"><del>LU-2024</del></a> tests: clean up lustre version checking"</p> <p>Indeed, the lustre setup bit should be done before version check, and I think Andreas's way (improving version check) is better, thank you for the patch, Andreas.</p> <p>For the UID/GID 60000 &amp; 60001, they are necessary for quota testing, and they've been existing for a very long time, I think thing should one of the 'standard ids", what do you think, Oleg?</p> <p>I think if the IDs are necessary and RUNAS_UID is not supported, then the message needs to be fixed to properly outline what parameters are really needed<br/> (I just figured out there are 4 parameters needed: TSTID TSTID2 TSTUSR TSTUSR2</p> <p>It's unclear if TSTID should be the uid of TSTUSR and same for usr2, if yes then just asking for TSTUSR/tstUSR2 should be enough and the system can resolve the names to userids.</p> <p>Sticking with userids likely to exist by default is fine by me, but not strictly required, what's important is some consitency in parameter requiring/reporting of errors.</p> <p>better error message: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/4268" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/4268</a></p> <p>patch landed for 2.4</p> Development Rank 1|hzvabb: Rank (Obsolete) 5206 Severity